Straights must bake cakes and arrange flowers for fags. Fags get to say "no coffee for you" to Christians. https://youtu.be/FRUJmGzV9Ko Some rights are clearly more equal than others.
What's your point? That there are retarded morons who can't see that as a problem? Yes, there are. There are as many or more retards who support the Christian bakers, and I suspect you know that full well.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
I think this means you agree with me, but I'm not sure because white man's devil tongue as a second language and all.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
I think this means you agree with me, but I'm not sure because white man's devil tongue as a second language and all.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.
So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.
So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.
So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.
That's not what "free market" means.
If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.
Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.
So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.
That's not what "free market" means.
If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.
Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.
Like I said, that's how I am and that's how my burger shack is. If you have money I don't give a flying fuck who you are.
Our country is different than that tho. It wasn't long ago when businesses were FS and could deny someone based on color. That has been fixed fortunately, and we are still wading through the religious/sexual preference issue. That being said, I don't think Dick's and Walmart upping the age to 21 is an issue someone should sue over. It's a money grab that's going to waste a bunch of time and money.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.
So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.
That's not what "free market" means.
If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.
Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.
Wait, you have a problem denying service to Jews?
I thought that was the one thing we could all agree on. Fuck.
Straights must bake cakes and arrange flowers for fags. Fags get to say "no coffee for you" to Christians. https://youtu.be/FRUJmGzV9Ko Some rights are clearly more equal than others.
What's your point? That there are retarded morons who can't see that as a problem? Yes, there are. There are as many or more retards who support the Christian bakers, and I suspect you know that full well.
If you have to ask what the point is, you don't get it.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
I think this means you agree with me, but I'm not sure because white man's devil tongue as a second language and all.
Think it's more this
If @dnc and I ever end our magical love affair, you are the next man up.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Cept the Bar has the right to ID everyone who walks in and refuse service for any reason. So while they may not be able to hang a sign that says "over 24 only", they certainly could refuse them service.
Young cooglet used to head out to the Idaho state line when the age was 19 (when I was 17 with a Fake ID mind you) and they had one bar out there that would only take 21 or older. It was the 21 club by name
And this was just before insurance companies started to take over the world. So I'm guessing it wasn't to lower their insurance but more because they didn't want the youngest of the punks in their bar. SO that would be my precedent from 30 plus years ago in this issue.
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
That's not what "free market" means.
Everybody knows free market is code for Universal Basic Income
For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.
Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.
I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".
Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?
I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.
In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.
That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.
Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.
But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.
Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.
So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.
That's not what "free market" means.
If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.
Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.
Like I said, that's how I am and that's how my burger shack is. If you have money I don't give a flying fuck who you are.
Our country is different than that tho. It wasn't long ago when businesses were FS and could deny someone based on color. That has been fixed fortunately, and we are still wading through the religious/sexual preference issue. That being said, I don't think Dick's and Walmart upping the age to 21 is an issue someone should sue over. It's a money grab that's going to waste a bunch of time and money.
Not really...
This law suit will hopefully get the state government off their ass and decide.
Just like the gay couple, this kid isn't wasting his time. He's going to win, because by law the store is unlawfully discriminating against him. If the law says 18, a store can't just say "we're going to be 21". It doesn't work that way. This is just another example of how some stores misjudge the political atmosphere. Instead of LIPO they jump on board to what they think is a popular social agenda, to which there will be a consequence. In this case, they are going to make the young dude rich.
I gave up on all this shit when they started passing laws saying you can't attempt to alter sexual preference but its OK to provide medical assistance to change your physical gender.
I'm thinking the fake lawyers that work for these companies probably took a look at the legal implications of their decision and gave it the green light to go forward.
The young dude isn't getting rich, either. Where are his damages? Emotional distress? lol Quit being a faggot.
I gave up on all this shit when they started passing laws saying you can't attempt to alter sexual preference but its OK to provide medical assistance to change your physical gender.
I'm thinking the fake lawyers that work for these companies probably took a look at the legal implications of their decision and gave it the green light to go forward.
The young dude isn't getting rich, either. Where are his damages? Emotional distress? lol Quit being a faggot.
Comments
So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.
If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.
Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.
Our country is different than that tho. It wasn't long ago when businesses were FS and could deny someone based on color. That has been fixed fortunately, and we are still wading through the religious/sexual preference issue. That being said, I don't think Dick's and Walmart upping the age to 21 is an issue someone should sue over. It's a money grab that's going to waste a bunch of time and money.
I thought that was the one thing we could all agree on. Fuck.
Young cooglet used to head out to the Idaho state line when the age was 19 (when I was 17 with a Fake ID mind you) and they had one bar out there that would only take 21 or older. It was the 21 club by name
And this was just before insurance companies started to take over the world. So I'm guessing it wasn't to lower their insurance but more because they didn't want the youngest of the punks in their bar. SO that would be my precedent from 30 plus years ago in this issue.
Sounds impressive, no?
Dicks is off limits!!!!!!
That's not what "free market" means.
Everybody knows free market is code for Universal Basic Income
And then they'll come for your Bibles.
This law suit will hopefully get the state government off their ass and decide.
Just like the gay couple, this kid isn't wasting his time. He's going to win, because by law the store is unlawfully discriminating against him. If the law says 18, a store can't just say "we're going to be 21". It doesn't work that way. This is just another example of how some stores misjudge the political atmosphere. Instead of LIPO they jump on board to what they think is a popular social agenda, to which there will be a consequence. In this case, they are going to make the young dude rich.
The young dude isn't getting rich, either. Where are his damages? Emotional distress? lol Quit being a faggot.