What say you now banana banners?
Comments
-
Those several hundred thousand civilians weren't actively fighting and utilizing war strategies against the U.S. military. Wouldn't really make sense to count them.2001400ex said:
Why do you hate the several hundred thousand civilians?Fenderbender123 said:
odds of winning with a gun > odds of winning without a gun2001400ex said:
Give me a call when any arms you possess can stand up to tanks and attack helicopters and shit.Sledog said:
The 2nd amendment ain't about hunting. HTHMosster47 said:A 10 round is still double of the Brady Bill and hunting rifles.
What do you need 10 rounds for in your magazine to harvest animals? I made 100 rounds for my 25-06 in junior high and have killed a fuck ton of deer with it. There are still about 60 rounds left of it.
That's 20+ years of highly successful field use. What would a 10 round magazine get me again besides pretending to be Billy Bad Ass?
And aren't there like 80 million gun owners in the U.S.? While the US military would be able to send, what, maybe 200,000 people if that? And how would the military handle all the people hiding out in their houses and sneaking around and stuff? Are they just gonna bomb the shit out of everything and destroy the country?
Just look at how inefficient all that fancy weaponry is when we use it to invade other countries on the war on terror. Only managed to kill like 80,000 terrorists in the last 16 years or so.
That being said, you are a pussy if you own a gun because you think it'll save you from a tyrannical government.
And sorry, but if you need the nanny state to come and take everyone's guns away cuz you're scared, then you're the one who's the pussy. Not somebody who would take up arms and literally fight against the US government. Good lord, dude.
I rarely do this, but I'm going to have to downvote your post. That's how bad it was.
-
That felt good.
-
I have not said anything about taking one gun from one person. Not even assualt rifles. Guns have their place, I have 4 in my house right now (couple are more collectible than anything). But guns are not going to save you from an overreaching government. Did you need your guns to save you under the tyrannical communist that was Obama?Fenderbender123 said:
Those several hundred thousand civilians weren't actively fighting and utilizing war strategies against the U.S. military. Wouldn't really make sense to count them.2001400ex said:
Why do you hate the several hundred thousand civilians?Fenderbender123 said:
odds of winning with a gun > odds of winning without a gun2001400ex said:
Give me a call when any arms you possess can stand up to tanks and attack helicopters and shit.Sledog said:
The 2nd amendment ain't about hunting. HTHMosster47 said:A 10 round is still double of the Brady Bill and hunting rifles.
What do you need 10 rounds for in your magazine to harvest animals? I made 100 rounds for my 25-06 in junior high and have killed a fuck ton of deer with it. There are still about 60 rounds left of it.
That's 20+ years of highly successful field use. What would a 10 round magazine get me again besides pretending to be Billy Bad Ass?
And aren't there like 80 million gun owners in the U.S.? While the US military would be able to send, what, maybe 200,000 people if that? And how would the military handle all the people hiding out in their houses and sneaking around and stuff? Are they just gonna bomb the shit out of everything and destroy the country?
Just look at how inefficient all that fancy weaponry is when we use it to invade other countries on the war on terror. Only managed to kill like 80,000 terrorists in the last 16 years or so.
That being said, you are a pussy if you own a gun because you think it'll save you from a tyrannical government.
And sorry, but if you need the nanny state to come and take everyone's guns away cuz you're scared, then you're the one who's the pussy. Not somebody who would take up arms and literally fight against the US government. Good lord, dude.
I rarely do this, but I'm going to have to downvote your post. That's how bad it was. -
Support the troops but be ready to kill them!Sledog said:
The 2nd amendment ain't about hunting. HTHMosster47 said:A 10 round is still double of the Brady Bill and hunting rifles.
What do you need 10 rounds for in your magazine to harvest animals? I made 100 rounds for my 25-06 in junior high and have killed a fuck ton of deer with it. There are still about 60 rounds left of it.
That's 20+ years of highly successful field use. What would a 10 round magazine get me again besides pretending to be Billy Bad Ass? -
The idea of American troops firing on fellow citizens is fairly ludicrous. Some would, most wouldn't.UWhuskytskeet said:
Support the troops but be ready to kill them!Sledog said:
The 2nd amendment ain't about hunting. HTHMosster47 said:A 10 round is still double of the Brady Bill and hunting rifles.
What do you need 10 rounds for in your magazine to harvest animals? I made 100 rounds for my 25-06 in junior high and have killed a fuck ton of deer with it. There are still about 60 rounds left of it.
That's 20+ years of highly successful field use. What would a 10 round magazine get me again besides pretending to be Billy Bad Ass?
So the act of showing up in force would negate the overwhelming power advnatage
We didn't even engage in the wholesale slaughter of our enemies post WW2. And studies there show that many soldiers on both sides aimed high to avoid killing anyone -
Said the waffle.2001400ex said:
I have not said anything about taking one gun from one person. Not even assualt rifles. Guns have their place, I have 4 in my house right now (couple are more collectible than anything). But guns are not going to save you from an overreaching government. Did you need your guns to save you under the tyrannical communist that was Obama?Fenderbender123 said:
Those several hundred thousand civilians weren't actively fighting and utilizing war strategies against the U.S. military. Wouldn't really make sense to count them.2001400ex said:
Why do you hate the several hundred thousand civilians?Fenderbender123 said:
odds of winning with a gun > odds of winning without a gun2001400ex said:
Give me a call when any arms you possess can stand up to tanks and attack helicopters and shit.Sledog said:
The 2nd amendment ain't about hunting. HTHMosster47 said:A 10 round is still double of the Brady Bill and hunting rifles.
What do you need 10 rounds for in your magazine to harvest animals? I made 100 rounds for my 25-06 in junior high and have killed a fuck ton of deer with it. There are still about 60 rounds left of it.
That's 20+ years of highly successful field use. What would a 10 round magazine get me again besides pretending to be Billy Bad Ass?
And aren't there like 80 million gun owners in the U.S.? While the US military would be able to send, what, maybe 200,000 people if that? And how would the military handle all the people hiding out in their houses and sneaking around and stuff? Are they just gonna bomb the shit out of everything and destroy the country?
Just look at how inefficient all that fancy weaponry is when we use it to invade other countries on the war on terror. Only managed to kill like 80,000 terrorists in the last 16 years or so.
That being said, you are a pussy if you own a gun because you think it'll save you from a tyrannical government.
And sorry, but if you need the nanny state to come and take everyone's guns away cuz you're scared, then you're the one who's the pussy. Not somebody who would take up arms and literally fight against the US government. Good lord, dude.
I rarely do this, but I'm going to have to downvote your post. That's how bad it was. -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War2001400ex said:But guns are not going to save you from an overreaching government.
-
That was in the 1700s. My point is, sometime in the last century, the ability for citizens to revolt against the government with arms has been lost. You are fucktarded if you don't think that.Fenderbender123 said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War2001400ex said:But guns are not going to save you from an overreaching government.
BTW, I'm waiting for some fucktard to post about the land deal in Nevada. Which is another dumb example. -
Tell that to the Viet Cong2001400ex said:
That was in the 1700s. My point is, sometime in the last century, the ability for citizens to revolt against the government with arms has been lost. You are fucktarded if you don't think that.Fenderbender123 said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War2001400ex said:But guns are not going to save you from an overreaching government.
BTW, I'm waiting for some fucktard to post about the land deal in Nevada. Which is another dumb example. -
The Iraq war says to fuck off.RaceBannon said:
The idea of American troops firing on fellow citizens is fairly ludicrous. Some would, most wouldn't.UWhuskytskeet said:
Support the troops but be ready to kill them!Sledog said:
The 2nd amendment ain't about hunting. HTHMosster47 said:A 10 round is still double of the Brady Bill and hunting rifles.
What do you need 10 rounds for in your magazine to harvest animals? I made 100 rounds for my 25-06 in junior high and have killed a fuck ton of deer with it. There are still about 60 rounds left of it.
That's 20+ years of highly successful field use. What would a 10 round magazine get me again besides pretending to be Billy Bad Ass?
So the act of showing up in force would negate the overwhelming power advnatage
We didn't even engage in the wholesale slaughter of our enemies post WW2. And studies there show that many soldiers on both sides aimed high to avoid killing anyone -
You are fucktarded if you think that.2001400ex said:
That was in the 1700s. My point is, sometime in the last century, the ability for citizens to revolt against the government with arms has been lost. You are fucktarded if you don't think that.Fenderbender123 said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War2001400ex said:But guns are not going to save you from an overreaching government.
BTW, I'm waiting for some fucktard to post about the land deal in Nevada. Which is another dumb example. -
No2001400ex said:
The Iraq war says to fuck off.RaceBannon said:
The idea of American troops firing on fellow citizens is fairly ludicrous. Some would, most wouldn't.UWhuskytskeet said:
Support the troops but be ready to kill them!Sledog said:
The 2nd amendment ain't about hunting. HTHMosster47 said:A 10 round is still double of the Brady Bill and hunting rifles.
What do you need 10 rounds for in your magazine to harvest animals? I made 100 rounds for my 25-06 in junior high and have killed a fuck ton of deer with it. There are still about 60 rounds left of it.
That's 20+ years of highly successful field use. What would a 10 round magazine get me again besides pretending to be Billy Bad Ass?
So the act of showing up in force would negate the overwhelming power advnatage
We didn't even engage in the wholesale slaughter of our enemies post WW2. And studies there show that many soldiers on both sides aimed high to avoid killing anyone
It doesn't
