Gun in peril or Culture in peril?
Comments
-
The school essentially had an armed guard.RaceBannon said:obviously the answer is all of the above. So in a free society do those of us who enjoy violent media, drugs, porn, and guns and can do so without committing mass murder want to give them all up for safety?
I don't think so. I have seen a lot of people who make their living from entertainment giving a spirited defense of the First Amendment and I don't blame them any more than those who defend the Second Amendment.
So since we aren't going to solve the problem from that angle put some fucking guards in the school like we do everywhere else
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them? -
What does him starting the thread have to do with anything?CuntWaffle said:
He started the thread. How fucking retarded are you? Serious question.2001400ex said:
It's clear you don't see your own hypocrisy.pawz said:
Not that we needed the verification, but thanks for reconfirming - again - you're the dumbest mother fucker anywhere.2001400ex said:
Funny how you blame the Muslim religion but not the culture.pawz said:It's not our possession of guns, it's our culture that must change. Freud intoned: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. As such, attacking a 'tool' is a band-aid for a failing social society.
From over prescription of psychotropic medication; to the violence propagated on TV, movies and video games; to social media's inherent mouth piece for narcissism; to society's vanquishing of spiritual, faith based principles (east, west or in between).
If we really aim to keep our children safe, we must focus on the deep-rooted cause of an assailants anguish, not his tool of destruction. And to do that, we must focus inwardly on what we have allowed ourselves to become. Unfortunately self-reflection in our society is as far from en vogue as is possible to imagine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv-OSyQkPXM
*in before boobs' flagging
Do try to stay on topic. -
No it didn't asshole2001400ex said:
The school essentially had an armed guard.RaceBannon said:obviously the answer is all of the above. So in a free society do those of us who enjoy violent media, drugs, porn, and guns and can do so without committing mass murder want to give them all up for safety?
I don't think so. I have seen a lot of people who make their living from entertainment giving a spirited defense of the First Amendment and I don't blame them any more than those who defend the Second Amendment.
So since we aren't going to solve the problem from that angle put some fucking guards in the school like we do everywhere else
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them?
It had a fucking coward
We're not talking "essentially". Congress doesn't have an essential armed guard
Let me reiterate
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them? -
RaceBannon said:
No it didn't asshole2001400ex said:
The school essentially had an armed guard.RaceBannon said:obviously the answer is all of the above. So in a free society do those of us who enjoy violent media, drugs, porn, and guns and can do so without committing mass murder want to give them all up for safety?
I don't think so. I have seen a lot of people who make their living from entertainment giving a spirited defense of the First Amendment and I don't blame them any more than those who defend the Second Amendment.
So since we aren't going to solve the problem from that angle put some fucking guards in the school like we do everywhere else
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them?
It had a fucking coward
We're not talking "essentially". Congress doesn't have an essential armed guard
Let me reiterate
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them?
yeah...but how are we? going to guard against cane-beatings in the Senate?
-
Race was there.PurpleThrobber said:RaceBannon said:
No it didn't asshole2001400ex said:
The school essentially had an armed guard.RaceBannon said:obviously the answer is all of the above. So in a free society do those of us who enjoy violent media, drugs, porn, and guns and can do so without committing mass murder want to give them all up for safety?
I don't think so. I have seen a lot of people who make their living from entertainment giving a spirited defense of the First Amendment and I don't blame them any more than those who defend the Second Amendment.
So since we aren't going to solve the problem from that angle put some fucking guards in the school like we do everywhere else
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them?
It had a fucking coward
We're not talking "essentially". Congress doesn't have an essential armed guard
Let me reiterate
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them?
yeah...but how are we? going to guard against cane-beatings in the Senate? -
It had an armed coward. He was probably put there because he didn't meet standards elsewhere so they stuck him at the school.2001400ex said:
The school essentially had an armed guard.RaceBannon said:obviously the answer is all of the above. So in a free society do those of us who enjoy violent media, drugs, porn, and guns and can do so without committing mass murder want to give them all up for safety?
I don't think so. I have seen a lot of people who make their living from entertainment giving a spirited defense of the First Amendment and I don't blame them any more than those who defend the Second Amendment.
So since we aren't going to solve the problem from that angle put some fucking guards in the school like we do everywhere else
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them? -
Brilliant analysis per usual.doogie said:When 17 children are murdered. People start asking questions. It didn’t take long to find the truth and a direct link to another Obama policy.
Educating youth to accept Police no-go-zones, one school at a time.
You would have been a Nazi. -
This is correct.RaceBannon said:obviously the answer is all of the above. So in a free society do those of us who enjoy violent media, drugs, porn, and guns and can do so without committing mass murder want to give them all up for safety?
I don't think so. I have seen a lot of people who make their living from entertainment giving a spirited defense of the First Amendment and I don't blame them any more than those who defend the Second Amendment.
So since we aren't going to solve the problem from that angle put some fucking guards in the school like we do everywhere else
Retards here who spent the week claiming armed guards won't work are fucking retards. Why would we listen to them?
One other question: I thought the Gun-Free school zones shit started in 1990. What did Obama do? -
I agree w/ this. I don't agree with the bold part. The road to hell is paved with fairy tales about a better life waiting for us when this one's over.pawz said:It's not our possession of guns, it's our culture that must change. Freud intoned: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. As such, attacking a 'tool' is a band-aid for a failing social society.
From over prescription of psychotropic medication; to the violence propagated on TV, movies and video games; to social media's inherent mouth piece for narcissism; to society's vanquishing of spiritual, faith based principles (east, west or in between).
If we really aim to keep our children safe, we must focus on the deep-rooted cause of an assailants anguish, not his tool of destruction. And to do that, we must focus inwardly on what we have allowed ourselves to become. Unfortunately self-reflection in our society is as far from en vogue as is possible to imagine.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv-OSyQkPXM
*in before boobs' flagging -
For the liberals. Your own logic should apply to guns as well.
