Hey look...actual Russian Collusion...
Comments
-
That Putin is an evil genius. No wonder trump worships him so much.RaceBannon said:They attacked Hillary because they knew she was going to win like everyone except for me
Then they turned on a dime to go after Trump and the media and M Moore couldn't jump on fast enough
The goal was to sow discord. Like say accusing a duly elected President of being a Russian agent or using a fake dossier to spy on the duly elected Presdient
A lot of folks here are in line for Russian Medals of Honor from Putin -
I guess Race thinks it isn't a good time for the President to call out the Russians for meddling and enforce the sanctions, too.
Maybe he's right. We should just puss the fuck out and apologise to Putin for making the accusation, and then back down.
Obama was good with apology tours - maybe he could give Trump some tips.
-
More people dislike the guy than like him, this shouldn't be news. Did the Russians plan this one too?HoustonHusky said:
An estimated 25,000 Russian colluders were at the anti-Trump rally in NYC (especially ironic considering a lot of their signs they were holding...) vs something like 40 Russian colluders at the pro-Trump rally. Want to guess which the press covered?UWhuskytskeet said:
Fox keeps conservatives in their bubble, shocking news!!HoustonHusky said:https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/02/19/flashback-cnn-and-msnbcs-enthusiastic-coverage-russian-sponsored-anti
A check of their November 12 coverage showed both CNN and MSNBC gave enthusiastic coverage to the Russian-organized anti-Trump rally that day, with live reports every hour. Correspondents celebrated the idea that it was “a love rally,” and repeated the marchers’ anti-Trump mantras, such as: “We reject the President-elect.”
While the two liberal anti-Trump networks offered heavy coverage of the anti-Trump rally throughout the day, a check of coverage between noon and 5:00 p.m. Eastern found that the Fox News Channel offered only a short re-cap (66 seconds) at the start of their 4:00 p.m. Eastern hour
........................
The Russians organized Pro and Anti Trump marches on the same day in the same cities.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/indictment-reveals-russians-also-organized-anti-trump-rallies-after-election.html
All they wanted to do is fan the flames and they did a great job of it.
Agree completely that they wanted to fan the flames on both sides...
-
My news source told me that's the most ever people for an inauguration speech.UWhuskytskeet said:
More people dislike the guy than like him, this shouldn't be news. Did the Russians plan this one too?HoustonHusky said:
An estimated 25,000 Russian colluders were at the anti-Trump rally in NYC (especially ironic considering a lot of their signs they were holding...) vs something like 40 Russian colluders at the pro-Trump rally. Want to guess which the press covered?UWhuskytskeet said:
Fox keeps conservatives in their bubble, shocking news!!HoustonHusky said:https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/02/19/flashback-cnn-and-msnbcs-enthusiastic-coverage-russian-sponsored-anti
A check of their November 12 coverage showed both CNN and MSNBC gave enthusiastic coverage to the Russian-organized anti-Trump rally that day, with live reports every hour. Correspondents celebrated the idea that it was “a love rally,” and repeated the marchers’ anti-Trump mantras, such as: “We reject the President-elect.”
While the two liberal anti-Trump networks offered heavy coverage of the anti-Trump rally throughout the day, a check of coverage between noon and 5:00 p.m. Eastern found that the Fox News Channel offered only a short re-cap (66 seconds) at the start of their 4:00 p.m. Eastern hour
........................
The Russians organized Pro and Anti Trump marches on the same day in the same cities.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/indictment-reveals-russians-also-organized-anti-trump-rallies-after-election.html
All they wanted to do is fan the flames and they did a great job of it.
Agree completely that they wanted to fan the flames on both sides... -
Russians are SOWING DISCORD against a DULY ELECTED president.UWhuskytskeet said:
More people dislike the guy than like him, this shouldn't be news. Did the Russians plan this one too?HoustonHusky said:
An estimated 25,000 Russian colluders were at the anti-Trump rally in NYC (especially ironic considering a lot of their signs they were holding...) vs something like 40 Russian colluders at the pro-Trump rally. Want to guess which the press covered?UWhuskytskeet said:
Fox keeps conservatives in their bubble, shocking news!!HoustonHusky said:https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/02/19/flashback-cnn-and-msnbcs-enthusiastic-coverage-russian-sponsored-anti
A check of their November 12 coverage showed both CNN and MSNBC gave enthusiastic coverage to the Russian-organized anti-Trump rally that day, with live reports every hour. Correspondents celebrated the idea that it was “a love rally,” and repeated the marchers’ anti-Trump mantras, such as: “We reject the President-elect.”
While the two liberal anti-Trump networks offered heavy coverage of the anti-Trump rally throughout the day, a check of coverage between noon and 5:00 p.m. Eastern found that the Fox News Channel offered only a short re-cap (66 seconds) at the start of their 4:00 p.m. Eastern hour
........................
The Russians organized Pro and Anti Trump marches on the same day in the same cities.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/indictment-reveals-russians-also-organized-anti-trump-rallies-after-election.html
All they wanted to do is fan the flames and they did a great job of it.
Agree completely that they wanted to fan the flames on both sides...
Watergate was a third-rate break in. THIS is bigger!!!! -
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense. -
Funny how your attitude is different than it was the last 8 years.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense. -
“One-term Obama” Mitch McConnell, and trumpanzee birthers day Hello.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense.
Trump’s first term legislative agenda is done. Other than passing Jeb bush’s Tax bill, and pelosi’s budget & debt limit increase he’s done nothing. At all. Trade? Immigration? Infrastructure? Health care? Nothing. You white trash fools got worked.
Congress has spring and summer breaks approaching. Then they break for good in September. That fat fucking orangutan is choking on his own lard.
Lofty goals are going down faster and harder than doogie last night on Capitol Hill.
If the Democrats win the senate in November, then under McConnell rules, no Supreme Court judge gets approved until after 2020.
-
It's ok. Lots of Obama voters I know weren't man enough to admit their mistake, either.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense. -
Did you?dflea said:
It's ok. Lots of Obama voters I know weren't man enough to admit their mistake, either.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense.
-
Didn't need to.Sledog said:
Did you?dflea said:
It's ok. Lots of Obama voters I know weren't man enough to admit their mistake, either.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense.
-
Rows and flows of angel haircreepycoug said:
It's BOTH SIDES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!dflea said:
Sounds like now would be a good time for the President to denounce the Russian meddling and enforce the sanctions.RaceBannon said:They attacked Hillary because they knew she was going to win like everyone except for me
Then they turned on a dime to go after Trump and the media and M Moore couldn't jump on fast enough
The goal was to sow discord. Like say accusing a duly elected President of being a Russian agent or using a fake dossier to spy on the duly elected Presdient
A lot of folks here are in line for Russian Medals of Honor from Putin
And ice cream castles in the air
And feather canyons everywhere
I've looked at clouds that way
But now they only block the sun
They rain and snow on everyone
So many things I would have done
But clouds got in my way
I've looked at clouds from both sides now
From up and down and still somehow
It's cloud's illusions I recall
I really don't know clouds at all -
We? are killing Russians in Syria. Can't we just be happy about that?
I said at the time that I am not willing to go to war with Russia because Hillary lost. Nothing's changed with me.
We had sanctions, we had a show court congress vote for some more that meant shit other than fooling the low info types we see here.
I'd rather put the sanctions back on Iran but that's just me -
YES!!!!!!!!!RaceBannon said:We? are killing Russians in Syria. Can't we just be happy about that?
I said at the time that I am not willing to go to war with Russia because Hillary lost. Nothing's changed with me.
We had sanctions, we had a show court congress vote for some more that meant shit other than fooling the low info types we see here.
I'd rather put the sanctions back on Iran but that's just me
But, Race, excuse me. As a proud member of Gen. X, the Cold War defines my idea of the bad guy.
You can't just erase that shit. It's in my head man.
-
I'm sure you always feel that way.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense. -
Hey fuck face. My secretary has a $1.50 she didn't have before. I call that progress.CirrhosisDawg said:
“One-term Obama” Mitch McConnell, and trumpanzee birthers day Hello.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense.
Trump’s first term legislative agenda is done. Other than passing Jeb bush’s Tax bill, and pelosi’s budget & debt limit increase he’s done nothing. At all. Trade? Immigration? Infrastructure? Health care? Nothing. You white trash fools got worked.
Congress has spring and summer breaks approaching. Then they break for good in September. That fat fucking orangutan is choking on his own lard.
Lofty goals are going down faster and harder than doogie last night on Capitol Hill.
If the Democrats win the senate in November, then under McConnell rules, no Supreme Court judge gets approved until after 2020. -
and she knows it’s no thanks to you. She knows also you’d have more to pay her if you could find some billing hours in your day.
-
This is true. But when she's your pretend secretary, does any of it really matter?doogie said:and she knows it’s no thanks to you. She knows also you’d have more to pay her if you could find some billing hours in your day.
-
^^^ Double team Iran and the Saudis by teaming up with Russia and fucking with the oil markets. Drop them dead.RaceBannon said:We? are killing Russians in Syria. Can't we just be happy about that?
I said at the time that I am not willing to go to war with Russia because Hillary lost. Nothing's changed with me.
We had sanctions, we had a show court congress vote for some more that meant shit other than fooling the low info types we see here.
I'd rather put the sanctions back on Iran but that's just me
Or just put on the pincher squeeze from both sides and take their oil fields the old fashioned way - by force.
USA/USSR vs. Germany kicked ass and is undefeated in pairs competition. USA/USSR vs. the funders of terrorism cuts off the money supply.
-
Your so full of shitcreepycoug said:
YES!!!!!!!!!RaceBannon said:We? are killing Russians in Syria. Can't we just be happy about that?
I said at the time that I am not willing to go to war with Russia because Hillary lost. Nothing's changed with me.
We had sanctions, we had a show court congress vote for some more that meant shit other than fooling the low info types we see here.
I'd rather put the sanctions back on Iran but that's just me
But, Race, excuse me. As a proud member of Gen. X, the Cold War defines my idea of the bad guy.
You can't just erase that shit. It's in my head man.
The left has a decades long love affair with Russia that ended abruptly on election night 2016
The democratic party by 1980 was on the side of the Soviets in the cold war -
-
That's a clever way to say "our President is soft on Russia".RaceBannon said:We? are killing Russians in Syria. Can't we just be happy about that?
I said at the time that I am not willing to go to war with Russia because Hillary lost. Nothing's changed with me.
We had sanctions, we had a show court congress vote for some more that meant shit other than fooling the low info types we see here.
I'd rather put the sanctions back on Iran but that's just me -
Other than killing them and fucking up their energy pricing sure.gif
I'm hearing that taking a few hundred million from them for uranium was being tuff -
creepycoug said:
Comments like this is just playing into the hands of the Russians. Give our great country a chance and be a builder not a divider. Your leadership is needed now more than ever.RaceBannon said:They attacked Hillary because they knew she was going to win like everyone except for me
Then they turned on a dime to go after Trump and the media and M Moore couldn't jump on fast enough
The goal was to sow discord. Like say accusing a duly elected President of being a Russian agent or using a fake dossier to spy on the duly elected Presdient
A lot of folks here are in line for Russian Medals of Honor from Putin
Noted Crack riddled cortex heard from -
A lot of hate in this one.CirrhosisDawg said:
“One-term Obama” Mitch McConnell, and trumpanzee birthers day Hello.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense.
Trump’s first term legislative agenda is done. Other than passing Jeb bush’s Tax bill, and pelosi’s budget & debt limit increase he’s done nothing. At all. Trade? Immigration? Infrastructure? Health care? Nothing. You white trash fools got worked.
Congress has spring and summer breaks approaching. Then they break for good in September. That fat fucking orangutan is choking on his own lard.
Lofty goals are going down faster and harder than doogie last night on Capitol Hill.
If the Democrats win the senate in November, then under McConnell rules, no Supreme Court judge gets approved until after 2020.
I've found that folks that espouse so much hate geared towards individuals, classes or races of people, usually have something in their own life that they hate about themselves.
Maybe it's time to look inside @cirhossisdawg for some introspection that may get you on that road to inner peace that you so surely are searching for. -
New Tagline? "HCH where bad ideas come to prosper"
-
A Little History of Documented Russian Collusion...
1984 - Ted Kennedy
https://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/ted-kennedy-soviet-union-ronald-reagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html#cc9a03a359ab
Kennedy's message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. "The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations," the memorandum stated. "These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign."
1980s - Russia promoted Nuclear Freeze Movement in the US:
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1891&dat=19830411&id=fKcfAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MtYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1418,1645657&hl=en
1990s...Russia was a mess and didn't have the ability to do much of anything...
Starting in the late 2000s -
Environmental, specifically anti-Fracking:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-10/putin-s-other-american-propaganda-effort-anti-fracking-news
Did a ton of anti-fracking propaganda in Europe:
http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/06/20/russias-quiet-war-against-european-fracking/
Bribing for Controlling Nuclear Material:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=EF502239FEA2AD586D9C16500F8937A5&gwt=pay
Now which side of the aisle is all this "collusion" occurring on again?
-
That's them. Not me. HTHRaceBannon said:
Your so full of shitcreepycoug said:
YES!!!!!!!!!RaceBannon said:We? are killing Russians in Syria. Can't we just be happy about that?
I said at the time that I am not willing to go to war with Russia because Hillary lost. Nothing's changed with me.
We had sanctions, we had a show court congress vote for some more that meant shit other than fooling the low info types we see here.
I'd rather put the sanctions back on Iran but that's just me
But, Race, excuse me. As a proud member of Gen. X, the Cold War defines my idea of the bad guy.
You can't just erase that shit. It's in my head man.
The left has a decades long love affair with Russia that ended abruptly on election night 2016
The democratic party by 1980 was on the side of the Soviets in the cold war
Like I said. My idea of the bad guy was the Russians and their penchant for all things state. They? fundamentally lack the DNA to be like us, and we know they have a cultural aversion to private property. -
But Obama?RaceBannon said:Other than killing them and fucking up their energy pricing sure.gif
I'm hearing that taking a few hundred million from them for uranium was being tuff
Guess what? He's in the peanut gallery. NOGAFAO. -
Why don't you and Race talk taxes for a while? I liked you better when you were groveling for his approval. You useless uneducated Salem-living Kewg.salemcoog said:creepycoug said:
Comments like this is just playing into the hands of the Russians. Give our great country a chance and be a builder not a divider. Your leadership is needed now more than ever.RaceBannon said:They attacked Hillary because they knew she was going to win like everyone except for me
Then they turned on a dime to go after Trump and the media and M Moore couldn't jump on fast enough
The goal was to sow discord. Like say accusing a duly elected President of being a Russian agent or using a fake dossier to spy on the duly elected Presdient
A lot of folks here are in line for Russian Medals of Honor from Putin
Noted Crack riddled cortex heard from
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
