Hey look...actual Russian Collusion...
Comments
-
That Putin is an evil genius. No wonder trump worships him so much.RaceBannon said:They attacked Hillary because they knew she was going to win like everyone except for me
Then they turned on a dime to go after Trump and the media and M Moore couldn't jump on fast enough
The goal was to sow discord. Like say accusing a duly elected President of being a Russian agent or using a fake dossier to spy on the duly elected Presdient
A lot of folks here are in line for Russian Medals of Honor from Putin -
I guess Race thinks it isn't a good time for the President to call out the Russians for meddling and enforce the sanctions, too.
Maybe he's right. We should just puss the fuck out and apologise to Putin for making the accusation, and then back down.
Obama was good with apology tours - maybe he could give Trump some tips.
-
More people dislike the guy than like him, this shouldn't be news. Did the Russians plan this one too?HoustonHusky said:
An estimated 25,000 Russian colluders were at the anti-Trump rally in NYC (especially ironic considering a lot of their signs they were holding...) vs something like 40 Russian colluders at the pro-Trump rally. Want to guess which the press covered?UWhuskytskeet said:
Fox keeps conservatives in their bubble, shocking news!!HoustonHusky said:https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/02/19/flashback-cnn-and-msnbcs-enthusiastic-coverage-russian-sponsored-anti
A check of their November 12 coverage showed both CNN and MSNBC gave enthusiastic coverage to the Russian-organized anti-Trump rally that day, with live reports every hour. Correspondents celebrated the idea that it was “a love rally,” and repeated the marchers’ anti-Trump mantras, such as: “We reject the President-elect.”
While the two liberal anti-Trump networks offered heavy coverage of the anti-Trump rally throughout the day, a check of coverage between noon and 5:00 p.m. Eastern found that the Fox News Channel offered only a short re-cap (66 seconds) at the start of their 4:00 p.m. Eastern hour
........................
The Russians organized Pro and Anti Trump marches on the same day in the same cities.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/indictment-reveals-russians-also-organized-anti-trump-rallies-after-election.html
All they wanted to do is fan the flames and they did a great job of it.
Agree completely that they wanted to fan the flames on both sides...
-
My news source told me that's the most ever people for an inauguration speech.UWhuskytskeet said:
More people dislike the guy than like him, this shouldn't be news. Did the Russians plan this one too?HoustonHusky said:
An estimated 25,000 Russian colluders were at the anti-Trump rally in NYC (especially ironic considering a lot of their signs they were holding...) vs something like 40 Russian colluders at the pro-Trump rally. Want to guess which the press covered?UWhuskytskeet said:
Fox keeps conservatives in their bubble, shocking news!!HoustonHusky said:https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/02/19/flashback-cnn-and-msnbcs-enthusiastic-coverage-russian-sponsored-anti
A check of their November 12 coverage showed both CNN and MSNBC gave enthusiastic coverage to the Russian-organized anti-Trump rally that day, with live reports every hour. Correspondents celebrated the idea that it was “a love rally,” and repeated the marchers’ anti-Trump mantras, such as: “We reject the President-elect.”
While the two liberal anti-Trump networks offered heavy coverage of the anti-Trump rally throughout the day, a check of coverage between noon and 5:00 p.m. Eastern found that the Fox News Channel offered only a short re-cap (66 seconds) at the start of their 4:00 p.m. Eastern hour
........................
The Russians organized Pro and Anti Trump marches on the same day in the same cities.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/indictment-reveals-russians-also-organized-anti-trump-rallies-after-election.html
All they wanted to do is fan the flames and they did a great job of it.
Agree completely that they wanted to fan the flames on both sides... -
Russians are SOWING DISCORD against a DULY ELECTED president.UWhuskytskeet said:
More people dislike the guy than like him, this shouldn't be news. Did the Russians plan this one too?HoustonHusky said:
An estimated 25,000 Russian colluders were at the anti-Trump rally in NYC (especially ironic considering a lot of their signs they were holding...) vs something like 40 Russian colluders at the pro-Trump rally. Want to guess which the press covered?UWhuskytskeet said:
Fox keeps conservatives in their bubble, shocking news!!HoustonHusky said:https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/02/19/flashback-cnn-and-msnbcs-enthusiastic-coverage-russian-sponsored-anti
A check of their November 12 coverage showed both CNN and MSNBC gave enthusiastic coverage to the Russian-organized anti-Trump rally that day, with live reports every hour. Correspondents celebrated the idea that it was “a love rally,” and repeated the marchers’ anti-Trump mantras, such as: “We reject the President-elect.”
While the two liberal anti-Trump networks offered heavy coverage of the anti-Trump rally throughout the day, a check of coverage between noon and 5:00 p.m. Eastern found that the Fox News Channel offered only a short re-cap (66 seconds) at the start of their 4:00 p.m. Eastern hour
........................
The Russians organized Pro and Anti Trump marches on the same day in the same cities.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/indictment-reveals-russians-also-organized-anti-trump-rallies-after-election.html
All they wanted to do is fan the flames and they did a great job of it.
Agree completely that they wanted to fan the flames on both sides...
Watergate was a third-rate break in. THIS is bigger!!!! -
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense. -
Funny how your attitude is different than it was the last 8 years.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense. -
“One-term Obama” Mitch McConnell, and trumpanzee birthers day Hello.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense.
Trump’s first term legislative agenda is done. Other than passing Jeb bush’s Tax bill, and pelosi’s budget & debt limit increase he’s done nothing. At all. Trade? Immigration? Infrastructure? Health care? Nothing. You white trash fools got worked.
Congress has spring and summer breaks approaching. Then they break for good in September. That fat fucking orangutan is choking on his own lard.
Lofty goals are going down faster and harder than doogie last night on Capitol Hill.
If the Democrats win the senate in November, then under McConnell rules, no Supreme Court judge gets approved until after 2020.
-
It's ok. Lots of Obama voters I know weren't man enough to admit their mistake, either.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense. -
Did you?dflea said:
It's ok. Lots of Obama voters I know weren't man enough to admit their mistake, either.doogie said:
I’m simply willing to let the Executive do his job. He’s got lofty goals I agree with, generally. If people don’t like what he does in another three years and vote him out, so be it.dflea said:
doogiebot is against Russian sanctions apparently.
Makes sense.
