Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Russia sanctions

13»

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    89ute said:

    A baker's dozen of Ruskies shit poast on twitter and facebook so sanctions should levied?

    This is why America is fucked.
    Dennis gets it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    I like to pretend China doesn’t exist and claim Russia is our main opposition for world power.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    doogie said:

    I like to pretend China doesn’t exist and claim Russia is our main opposition for world power.

    Well, when can we expect you to start apologising on China's behalf, you anti-American fuck?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited February 2018
    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    insinceredawg said:

    So now that everyone here on both sides can agree that the Russians did meddle in our election (the degree to which it impacted the results is debatable), can we then agree that the Stable Genius should implement the sanctions that both the GOP-controlled House and Senate passed?

    Waiting on doogie with the kremlin talking points..

    No, we can't agree. Indicting 12 Russians using social media to try and effect an election in a country of 300 million is a pathetic waste of time. Let's start first with the bigger issue: sedition by the DNC/Hillary/Obama/DOJ in an attempt to overturn and election. Clean up our own house first before we address the insignificant issue of Russian meddling.
    If you really think the Russian meddling was limited to the 13 individuals who got indicted then I can't help you. This the tip of the iceberg and when Mueller is done, we'll likely learn there were thousands of trolls deployed by the Kremlin.
    So shouldn't we maybe wait for those "thousands" to be exposed and/or indicted before we issue the sanctions???? Maybe let the sanctions fit the crime.

    Or should we liberal knee jerk the sanctions through on our way to the door to door gun seizures?
    I like to apologise for sanctions placed on our primary opposition for world power.

    I do that.

    Wait. No I don't. Only a paid Russian troll or complete fucking retard commie lover would do that.
    So let's say that we lay some sanctions now to fit the crime of the 13indictments .

    A- what should those be?

    and

    B- What if it's discovered that there were more egregious acts committed that come to light in the next month or so?


    Is your stance that Trump needs to level those sanctions NOW to assure and pacify his haters that He wasn't involved in collusion? Even though they my not be enough to fit the crimes?

    Or do we just keep laying sanction after sanction as more Russians are indicted in election chinfluence?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,029
    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    insinceredawg said:

    So now that everyone here on both sides can agree that the Russians did meddle in our election (the degree to which it impacted the results is debatable), can we then agree that the Stable Genius should implement the sanctions that both the GOP-controlled House and Senate passed?

    Waiting on doogie with the kremlin talking points..

    No, we can't agree. Indicting 12 Russians using social media to try and effect an election in a country of 300 million is a pathetic waste of time. Let's start first with the bigger issue: sedition by the DNC/Hillary/Obama/DOJ in an attempt to overturn and election. Clean up our own house first before we address the insignificant issue of Russian meddling.
    If you really think the Russian meddling was limited to the 13 individuals who got indicted then I can't help you. This the tip of the iceberg and when Mueller is done, we'll likely learn there were thousands of trolls deployed by the Kremlin.
    So shouldn't we maybe wait for those "thousands" to be exposed and/or indicted before we issue the sanctions???? Maybe let the sanctions fit the crime.

    Or should we liberal knee jerk the sanctions through on our way to the door to door gun seizures?
    I like to apologise for sanctions placed on our primary opposition for world power.

    I do that.

    Wait. No I don't. Only a paid Russian troll or complete fucking retard commie lover would do that.
    So let's say that we lay some sanctions now to fit the crime of the 13indictments .

    A- what should those be?

    and

    B- What if it's discovered that there were more egregious acts committed that come to light in the next month or so?


    Is your stance that Trump needs to level those sanctions NOW to assure and pacify his haters that He wasn't involved in collusion? Even though they not be enough to fit the crimes?

    Or do we just keep laying sanction after sanction as more Russians are indicted in election chinfluence?

    Why do you hate America?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    creepycoug said:

    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    insinceredawg said:

    So now that everyone here on both sides can agree that the Russians did meddle in our election (the degree to which it impacted the results is debatable), can we then agree that the Stable Genius should implement the sanctions that both the GOP-controlled House and Senate passed?

    Waiting on doogie with the kremlin talking points..

    No, we can't agree. Indicting 12 Russians using social media to try and effect an election in a country of 300 million is a pathetic waste of time. Let's start first with the bigger issue: sedition by the DNC/Hillary/Obama/DOJ in an attempt to overturn and election. Clean up our own house first before we address the insignificant issue of Russian meddling.
    If you really think the Russian meddling was limited to the 13 individuals who got indicted then I can't help you. This the tip of the iceberg and when Mueller is done, we'll likely learn there were thousands of trolls deployed by the Kremlin.
    So shouldn't we maybe wait for those "thousands" to be exposed and/or indicted before we issue the sanctions???? Maybe let the sanctions fit the crime.

    Or should we liberal knee jerk the sanctions through on our way to the door to door gun seizures?
    I like to apologise for sanctions placed on our primary opposition for world power.

    I do that.

    Wait. No I don't. Only a paid Russian troll or complete fucking retard commie lover would do that.
    So let's say that we lay some sanctions now to fit the crime of the 13indictments .

    A- what should those be?

    and

    B- What if it's discovered that there were more egregious acts committed that come to light in the next month or so?


    Is your stance that Trump needs to level those sanctions NOW to assure and pacify his haters that He wasn't involved in collusion? Even though they not be enough to fit the crimes?

    Or do we just keep laying sanction after sanction as more Russians are indicted in election chinfluence?

    Why do you hate America?
    You should stick to your dime store Philosophy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,029
    salemcoog said:

    creepycoug said:

    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    insinceredawg said:

    So now that everyone here on both sides can agree that the Russians did meddle in our election (the degree to which it impacted the results is debatable), can we then agree that the Stable Genius should implement the sanctions that both the GOP-controlled House and Senate passed?

    Waiting on doogie with the kremlin talking points..

    No, we can't agree. Indicting 12 Russians using social media to try and effect an election in a country of 300 million is a pathetic waste of time. Let's start first with the bigger issue: sedition by the DNC/Hillary/Obama/DOJ in an attempt to overturn and election. Clean up our own house first before we address the insignificant issue of Russian meddling.
    If you really think the Russian meddling was limited to the 13 individuals who got indicted then I can't help you. This the tip of the iceberg and when Mueller is done, we'll likely learn there were thousands of trolls deployed by the Kremlin.
    So shouldn't we maybe wait for those "thousands" to be exposed and/or indicted before we issue the sanctions???? Maybe let the sanctions fit the crime.

    Or should we liberal knee jerk the sanctions through on our way to the door to door gun seizures?
    I like to apologise for sanctions placed on our primary opposition for world power.

    I do that.

    Wait. No I don't. Only a paid Russian troll or complete fucking retard commie lover would do that.
    So let's say that we lay some sanctions now to fit the crime of the 13indictments .

    A- what should those be?

    and

    B- What if it's discovered that there were more egregious acts committed that come to light in the next month or so?


    Is your stance that Trump needs to level those sanctions NOW to assure and pacify his haters that He wasn't involved in collusion? Even though they not be enough to fit the crimes?

    Or do we just keep laying sanction after sanction as more Russians are indicted in election chinfluence?

    Why do you hate America?
    You should stick to your dime store Philosophy.
    I guess that question made you uncomfortable. Yes?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    insinceredawg said:

    So now that everyone here on both sides can agree that the Russians did meddle in our election (the degree to which it impacted the results is debatable), can we then agree that the Stable Genius should implement the sanctions that both the GOP-controlled House and Senate passed?

    Waiting on doogie with the kremlin talking points..

    No, we can't agree. Indicting 12 Russians using social media to try and effect an election in a country of 300 million is a pathetic waste of time. Let's start first with the bigger issue: sedition by the DNC/Hillary/Obama/DOJ in an attempt to overturn and election. Clean up our own house first before we address the insignificant issue of Russian meddling.
    If you really think the Russian meddling was limited to the 13 individuals who got indicted then I can't help you. This the tip of the iceberg and when Mueller is done, we'll likely learn there were thousands of trolls deployed by the Kremlin.
    So shouldn't we maybe wait for those "thousands" to be exposed and/or indicted before we issue the sanctions???? Maybe let the sanctions fit the crime.

    Or should we liberal knee jerk the sanctions through on our way to the door to door gun seizures?
    I like to apologise for sanctions placed on our primary opposition for world power.

    I do that.

    Wait. No I don't. Only a paid Russian troll or complete fucking retard commie lover would do that.
    So let's say that we lay some sanctions now to fit the crime of the 13indictments .

    A- what should those be?

    and

    B- What if it's discovered that there were more egregious acts committed that come to light in the next month or so?


    Is your stance that Trump needs to level those sanctions NOW to assure and pacify his haters that He wasn't involved in collusion? Even though they my not be enough to fit the crimes?

    Or do we just keep laying sanction after sanction as more Russians are indicted in election chinfluence?

    The sanctions have been approved by the House and Senate already. But go ahead and tell everyone how inappropriate the sanctions are you fucking apologist for Russia.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    It Looks Like "The Greatest Act Of Bureaucratic Ass-Covering In US History..."

    WASHINGTON — A team of American political strategists who helped [California] Gov. Pete Wilson with his abortive presidential bid earlier this year said this week that they served as Russian President Boris N. Yeltsin’s secret campaign weapon in his comeback win over a Communist challenge.

    —The Los Angeles Times, July 9, 1996

    http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/thirteen-russians-ands-ham-sandwich/

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    Dude61 said:

    It Looks Like "The Greatest Act Of Bureaucratic Ass-Covering In US History..."

    WASHINGTON — A team of American political strategists who helped [California] Gov. Pete Wilson with his abortive presidential bid earlier this year said this week that they served as Russian President Boris N. Yeltsin’s secret campaign weapon in his comeback win over a Communist challenge.

    —The Los Angeles Times, July 9, 1996

    http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/thirteen-russians-ands-ham-sandwich/

    lol

    Boris Yeltsin. 1996. Election in Russia.


    Good work, good effort.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Dude61 said:

    It Looks Like "The Greatest Act Of Bureaucratic Ass-Covering In US History..."

    WASHINGTON — A team of American political strategists who helped [California] Gov. Pete Wilson with his abortive presidential bid earlier this year said this week that they served as Russian President Boris N. Yeltsin’s secret campaign weapon in his comeback win over a Communist challenge.

    —The Los Angeles Times, July 9, 1996

    http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/thirteen-russians-ands-ham-sandwich/

    Pete Wilson & boris yeltsin?
    This is dumber than a doggie post.

    To be fair, though, you are dumber than doogie, hard as that is to imagine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    I guess this means sanctions should be coming soon right?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter