Bush originally went to Atlanta because he wanted to work with Kyle Shanahan. He loves Shanahan's offense, and so do I. Shanny made the fucking Browns offense look decent for half a season, and they were starting Brian Hoyer, who's a complete retard. He was also able to make the 49ers offense work last year despite a complete lack of skill talent and a QB with poor deep ball accuracy.
Sure, Bush wanted to get the fuck away from that drunk retard Sark, but Peterman didn't bring him back to not have any autonomy or repsonsibility to allow him to grow. I think this whole "It's Pete's Offense" saying is mostly bullshit anyway. Peterman isn't an offensive guy any more. He's transitioned to being more of a CEO-style coach.
I think Bush will be allowed to make this "his" offense, within reason of course. If nothing else, I think we can expect run-pass balance, getting the RBs more targets in the passing game, and a lot more play-action. I also think Black Beast will play a pretty big role as the move TE. Might be our leading receiver next year, considering what we're returning.
Disagree.
The job of a CEO is to develop the strategy.
Bush will have a different tact than Smith did, and he will be allowed to grow.
But to think Petersen doesn't give him the framework and the vision is idiotic.
I've said before, it's not like Petersen is spitting coffee out Sunday morning as he reviews the box score.
Are you dense? It's always a treat when someone says "I disagree" then go on to say a bunch of shit that's in no way contrary to anything you were saying. Where the fuck did I say that Peterman stands on the sideline with noise-cancelling headphones and a blindfold on? Of course he takes part in forming strategy and gameplanning. You'd have to be a fucking imbecile to even think that I insinuated anything different.
Bush originally went to Atlanta because he wanted to work with Kyle Shanahan. He loves Shanahan's offense, and so do I. Shanny made the fucking Browns offense look decent for half a season, and they were starting Brian Hoyer, who's a complete retard. He was also able to make the 49ers offense work last year despite a complete lack of skill talent and a QB with poor deep ball accuracy.
Sure, Bush wanted to get the fuck away from that drunk retard Sark, but Peterman didn't bring him back to not have any autonomy or repsonsibility to allow him to grow. I think this whole "It's Pete's Offense" saying is mostly bullshit anyway. Peterman isn't an offensive guy any more. He's transitioned to being more of a CEO-style coach.
I think Bush will be allowed to make this "his" offense, within reason of course. If nothing else, I think we can expect run-pass balance, getting the RBs more targets in the passing game, and a lot more play-action. I also think Black Beast will play a pretty big role as the move TE. Might be our leading receiver next year, considering what we're returning.
Disagree.
The job of a CEO is to develop the strategy.
Bush will have a different tact than Smith did, and he will be allowed to grow.
But to think Petersen doesn't give him the framework and the vision is idiotic.
I've said before, it's not like Petersen is spitting coffee out Sunday morning as he reviews the box score.
Are you dense? It's always a treat when someone says "I disagree" then go on to say a bunch of shit that's in no way contrary to anything you were saying. Where the fuck did I say that Peterman stands on the sideline with noise-cancelling headphones and a blindfold on? Of course he takes part in forming strategy and gameplanning. You'd have to be a fucking imbecile to even think that I insinuated anything different.
Jesus christ.
You're pretty stupid.
Woah that's pretty harsh dude. I'm off to go kill myself.
Bush originally went to Atlanta because he wanted to work with Kyle Shanahan. He loves Shanahan's offense, and so do I. Shanny made the fucking Browns offense look decent for half a season, and they were starting Brian Hoyer, who's a complete retard. He was also able to make the 49ers offense work last year despite a complete lack of skill talent and a QB with poor deep ball accuracy.
Sure, Bush wanted to get the fuck away from that drunk retard Sark, but Peterman didn't bring him back to not have any autonomy or repsonsibility to allow him to grow. I think this whole "It's Pete's Offense" saying is mostly bullshit anyway. Peterman isn't an offensive guy any more. He's transitioned to being more of a CEO-style coach.
I think Bush will be allowed to make this "his" offense, within reason of course. If nothing else, I think we can expect run-pass balance, getting the RBs more targets in the passing game, and a lot more play-action. I also think Black Beast will play a pretty big role as the move TE. Might be our leading receiver next year, considering what we're returning.
Disagree.
The job of a CEO is to develop the strategy.
Bush will have a different tact than Smith did, and he will be allowed to grow.
But to think Petersen doesn't give him the framework and the vision is idiotic.
I've said before, it's not like Petersen is spitting coffee out Sunday morning as he reviews the box score.
Are you dense? It's always a treat when someone says "I disagree" then go on to say a bunch of shit that's in no way contrary to anything you were saying. Where the fuck did I say that Peterman stands on the sideline with noise-cancelling headphones and a blindfold on? Of course he takes part in forming strategy and gameplanning. You'd have to be a fucking imbecile to even think that I insinuated anything different.
Jesus christ.
You're pretty stupid.
Woah that's pretty harsh dude. I'm off to go kill myself.
Bush originally went to Atlanta because he wanted to work with Kyle Shanahan. He loves Shanahan's offense, and so do I. Shanny made the fucking Browns offense look decent for half a season, and they were starting Brian Hoyer, who's a complete retard. He was also able to make the 49ers offense work last year despite a complete lack of skill talent and a QB with poor deep ball accuracy.
Sure, Bush wanted to get the fuck away from that drunk retard Sark, but Peterman didn't bring him back to not have any autonomy or repsonsibility to allow him to grow. I think this whole "It's Pete's Offense" saying is mostly bullshit anyway. Peterman isn't an offensive guy any more. He's transitioned to being more of a CEO-style coach.
I think Bush will be allowed to make this "his" offense, within reason of course. If nothing else, I think we can expect run-pass balance, getting the RBs more targets in the passing game, and a lot more play-action. I also think Black Beast will play a pretty big role as the move TE. Might be our leading receiver next year, considering what we're returning.
You just made this up. Bush was hired after Shanahan left for the 49ers. Even if that weren’t true, everyone knew Shanahan was getting a head coaching job.
I bet it’s more likely he went to Atalanta because Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, and two good RB’s.
Bush originally went to Atlanta because he wanted to work with Kyle Shanahan. He loves Shanahan's offense, and so do I. Shanny made the fucking Browns offense look decent for half a season, and they were starting Brian Hoyer, who's a complete retard. He was also able to make the 49ers offense work last year despite a complete lack of skill talent and a QB with poor deep ball accuracy.
Sure, Bush wanted to get the fuck away from that drunk retard Sark, but Peterman didn't bring him back to not have any autonomy or repsonsibility to allow him to grow. I think this whole "It's Pete's Offense" saying is mostly bullshit anyway. Peterman isn't an offensive guy any more. He's transitioned to being more of a CEO-style coach.
I think Bush will be allowed to make this "his" offense, within reason of course. If nothing else, I think we can expect run-pass balance, getting the RBs more targets in the passing game, and a lot more play-action. I also think Black Beast will play a pretty big role as the move TE. Might be our leading receiver next year, considering what we're returning.
You just made this up. Bush was hired after Shanahan left for the 49ers. Even if that weren’t true, everyone knew Shanahan was getting a head coaching job.
I bet it’s more likely he went to Atalanta because Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, and two good RB’s.
I didn't make it up. I assumed Shanahan was still there when he took the job but I may have gotten the timeline wrong. I'll take your word for it. He may not have taken the job because of Shanahan, but he IS a big fan. I know that for sure, because he pointed him out specifically in an interview, so the rest of my post stands.
Bush originally went to Atlanta because he wanted to work with Kyle Shanahan. He loves Shanahan's offense, and so do I. Shanny made the fucking Browns offense look decent for half a season, and they were starting Brian Hoyer, who's a complete retard. He was also able to make the 49ers offense work last year despite a complete lack of skill talent and a QB with poor deep ball accuracy.
Sure, Bush wanted to get the fuck away from that drunk retard Sark, but Peterman didn't bring him back to not have any autonomy or repsonsibility to allow him to grow. I think this whole "It's Pete's Offense" saying is mostly bullshit anyway. Peterman isn't an offensive guy any more. He's transitioned to being more of a CEO-style coach.
I think Bush will be allowed to make this "his" offense, within reason of course. If nothing else, I think we can expect run-pass balance, getting the RBs more targets in the passing game, and a lot more play-action. I also think Black Beast will play a pretty big role as the move TE. Might be our leading receiver next year, considering what we're returning.
You just made this up. Bush was hired after Shanahan left for the 49ers. Even if that weren’t true, everyone knew Shanahan was getting a head coaching job.
I bet it’s more likely he went to Atalanta because Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, and two good RB’s.
I didn't make it up. I assumed Shanahan was still there when he took the job but I may have gotten the timeline wrong. I'll take your word for it. He may not have taken the job because of Shanahan, but he IS a big fan. I know that for sure, because he pointed him out specifically in an interview, so the rest of my post stands.
Last 2 possessions in the 4th qtr against Stanford
(11:45 - 4th) Jake Bailey kickoff for 65 yds for a touchback
1st and 10 at WASH 25 (11:37 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for no gain to the Wash 25
2nd and 10 at WASH 25 (11:06 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for a loss of 1 yard to the Wash 24
3rd and 11 at WASH 24 (10:21 - 4th) Jake Browning sacked by Bobby Okereke for a loss of 18 yards to the Wash 6
8:48 - 4th) Jake Bailey kickoff for 65 yds for a touchback
1st and 10 at WASH 25 (8:40 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Dante Pettis for 20 yds to the Wash 45 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WASH 45 (8:10 - 4th) Dante Pettis run for a loss of 1 yard to the Wash 44
2nd and 11 at WASH 44 (7:30 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass incomplete to Baccellia, Andre, PENALTY STANFORD pass interference (Buncom, Frank) 15 yards to the STANFORD41, NO PLAY, 1ST DOWN WASHINGTON.
1st and 10 at STAN 41 (7:15 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for a loss of 3 yards to the Stanf 44
2nd and 13 at STAN 44 (6:46 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass incomplete to Pettis, Dante, PENALTY STANFORD holding (Murphy, Alameen) 10 yards to the STANFORD34, NO PLAY, 1ST DOWN WASHINGTON.
1st and 10 at STAN 34 (6:32 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Aaron Fuller for 3 yds to the Stanf 31
2nd and 7 at STAN 31 (6:20 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Ty Jones for 11 yds to the Stanf 20 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at STAN 20 (6:02 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass complete to Pettis, Dante for 3 yards to the STANFORD17, PENALTY WASHINGTON ineligible downfield on pass (McGary, Kaleb) 5 yards to the STANFORD25, NO PLAY.
1st and 15 at STAN 25 (5:43 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Dante Pettis for 6 yds to the Stanf 19
2nd and 9 at STAN 19 (5:17 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Lavon Coleman for 18 yds to the Stanf 1 for a 1ST down
1st and Goal at STAN 1 (4:57 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for no gain to the Stanf 1
2nd and Goal at STAN 1 (4:22 - 4th) Myles Gaskin run for 1 yd for a TD, (Jake Browning pass to Dante Pettis for Two-Point Conversion
Last 2 possessions in the 4th qtr against Stanford
(11:45 - 4th) Jake Bailey kickoff for 65 yds for a touchback
1st and 10 at WASH 25 (11:37 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for no gain to the Wash 25
2nd and 10 at WASH 25 (11:06 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for a loss of 1 yard to the Wash 24
3rd and 11 at WASH 24 (10:21 - 4th) Jake Browning sacked by Bobby Okereke for a loss of 18 yards to the Wash 6
8:48 - 4th) Jake Bailey kickoff for 65 yds for a touchback
1st and 10 at WASH 25 (8:40 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Dante Pettis for 20 yds to the Wash 45 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WASH 45 (8:10 - 4th) Dante Pettis run for a loss of 1 yard to the Wash 44
2nd and 11 at WASH 44 (7:30 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass incomplete to Baccellia, Andre, PENALTY STANFORD pass interference (Buncom, Frank) 15 yards to the STANFORD41, NO PLAY, 1ST DOWN WASHINGTON.
1st and 10 at STAN 41 (7:15 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for a loss of 3 yards to the Stanf 44
2nd and 13 at STAN 44 (6:46 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass incomplete to Pettis, Dante, PENALTY STANFORD holding (Murphy, Alameen) 10 yards to the STANFORD34, NO PLAY, 1ST DOWN WASHINGTON.
1st and 10 at STAN 34 (6:32 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Aaron Fuller for 3 yds to the Stanf 31
2nd and 7 at STAN 31 (6:20 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Ty Jones for 11 yds to the Stanf 20 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at STAN 20 (6:02 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass complete to Pettis, Dante for 3 yards to the STANFORD17, PENALTY WASHINGTON ineligible downfield on pass (McGary, Kaleb) 5 yards to the STANFORD25, NO PLAY.
1st and 15 at STAN 25 (5:43 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Dante Pettis for 6 yds to the Stanf 19
2nd and 9 at STAN 19 (5:17 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Lavon Coleman for 18 yds to the Stanf 1 for a 1ST down
1st and Goal at STAN 1 (4:57 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for no gain to the Stanf 1
2nd and Goal at STAN 1 (4:22 - 4th) Myles Gaskin run for 1 yd for a TD, (Jake Browning pass to Dante Pettis for Two-Point Conversion
The run didn't work a few times therefore it sucked.
Comments
I bet it’s more likely he went to Atalanta because Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, and two good RB’s.
If not, fire everyone.
They do that.
Just not enough times.
I think the "just run the damn ball" angle is overplayed at times on this bored, but we win both those games if we run the ball more.
Simple fact.
And forced the ball in Brownsquirts hand to try and win. And since you werent playing Fresno, PSU or WSU he couldnt do it.
Last 2 possessions in the 4th qtr against Stanford
(11:45 - 4th) Jake Bailey kickoff for 65 yds for a touchback
1st and 10 at WASH 25
(11:37 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for no gain to the Wash 25
2nd and 10 at WASH 25
(11:06 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for a loss of 1 yard to the Wash 24
3rd and 11 at WASH 24
(10:21 - 4th) Jake Browning sacked by Bobby Okereke for a loss of 18 yards to the Wash 6
8:48 - 4th) Jake Bailey kickoff for 65 yds for a touchback
1st and 10 at WASH 25
(8:40 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Dante Pettis for 20 yds to the Wash 45 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WASH 45
(8:10 - 4th) Dante Pettis run for a loss of 1 yard to the Wash 44
2nd and 11 at WASH 44
(7:30 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass incomplete to Baccellia, Andre, PENALTY STANFORD pass interference (Buncom, Frank) 15 yards to the STANFORD41, NO PLAY, 1ST DOWN WASHINGTON.
1st and 10 at STAN 41
(7:15 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for a loss of 3 yards to the Stanf 44
2nd and 13 at STAN 44
(6:46 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass incomplete to Pettis, Dante, PENALTY STANFORD holding (Murphy, Alameen) 10 yards to the STANFORD34, NO PLAY, 1ST DOWN WASHINGTON.
1st and 10 at STAN 34
(6:32 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Aaron Fuller for 3 yds to the Stanf 31
2nd and 7 at STAN 31
(6:20 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Ty Jones for 11 yds to the Stanf 20 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at STAN 20
(6:02 - 4th) Browning, Jake pass complete to Pettis, Dante for 3 yards to the STANFORD17, PENALTY WASHINGTON ineligible downfield on pass (McGary, Kaleb) 5 yards to the STANFORD25, NO PLAY.
1st and 15 at STAN 25
(5:43 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Dante Pettis for 6 yds to the Stanf 19
2nd and 9 at STAN 19
(5:17 - 4th) Jake Browning pass complete to Lavon Coleman for 18 yds to the Stanf 1 for a 1ST down
1st and Goal at STAN 1
(4:57 - 4th) Lavon Coleman run for no gain to the Stanf 1
2nd and Goal at STAN 1
(4:22 - 4th) Myles Gaskin run for 1 yd for a TD, (Jake Browning pass to Dante Pettis for Two-Point Conversion
Yes. Those 5 plays you highlighted totally shore up your argument.
Totally.
Did Mike Leach hack your account?