According to many on the left, even the NYT is racist now
Comments
-
Wrong.YellowSnow said:
I laffed, but this line of reasoning is just silly. There is absolutely no moral or ethical imperative for any nation to confer the benefit of its citizenship - inc. standard of living - to an unlimited number of humans around the globe. Yes, we all hit the geographical jackpot by being born in the US n' A and I recognize this. The fact that the United States has done more to raising living standards around the globe from the period 1945 to the present than any nation in history makes me feel less guilty about it.creepycoug said:
Yes, again. It is a free market. If he can take it, then they're overpaid or don't want it to begin with.oregonblitzkrieg said:Again with the hungry worker argument. But he's so HUNGRY it would be wrong not to let him in and take 3 jobs from US citizens, or from immigrants already living here. If he wants to work his ass off, he can do it in his own country and make that country better. If his own country doesn't let him, I'm sure he can find an open border alternative to the US. Germany maybe?
There should be no economic safety in the accident of where youtr dad humped your mom and where she was 9 mos. later. I'm with Gates on that point. If he's better at, or will do it as well and cheaper, then the job is his.
No good Republican would ever disagree with that. The labor people got in bed with the religious fundies and overtook my party. The party of Reagan.
If the goal is a greater society, like organizations, new blood is good an healthy.
I say again: make room for people who see this place and value it by kicking out those who see this place as a birthright. The welfare problem will be gone overnight.
The Salemkewg line has had over 100 years to figure it out, and still can't. Dispatch him and his ilk and make room for the guy who will send his kid to UW Medical School by starting a yard service.
Think about it. -
The Tax subsidy the rest of America was paying to California was corrected in the Tax Reform legislation passed by both houses and signed into law by President Trump.CirrhosisDawg said:
Give us back our federal tax dollars then. Where do you think fema gets its money? California is the 5th largest economy in the world. After an earthquake, you think we need the pennies, nickels and trinkets from the needy recipient states?PurpleThrobber said:
When the federal grant dollars dry up, have fun with that.CirrhosisDawg said:
Immigration is federal law, enforced by and with federal resources. It has nothing to do with states or cities. You didn’t know that?oregonblitzkrieg said:Lets just dispense already with the false notion that sanctuary cities, their administrators and supporters have any bargaining power on this issue. They have no ground to stand on. They are operating against the law. Start arresting sanctuary city mayors, sanctuary state governors, make these faggots and their supporters understand that they are not in charge, that they don't have the authority to set immigration policy.
California has important work going on helping lead the world, and we choose not to waste our resources on trumpian foolishness.
That includes FEMA money, earthquake boy.
Where u been? -
In less time than you think, there will be an equally hard swing back, which will be viewed by people like me and history as the truly ultimate price to be paid for the present day indulgences of those who like to train monkeys like you.doogie said:
The Tax subsidy the rest of America was paying to California was corrected in the Tax Reform legislation passed by both houses and signed into law by President Trump.CirrhosisDawg said:
Give us back our federal tax dollars then. Where do you think fema gets its money? California is the 5th largest economy in the world. After an earthquake, you think we need the pennies, nickels and trinkets from the needy recipient states?PurpleThrobber said:
When the federal grant dollars dry up, have fun with that.CirrhosisDawg said:
Immigration is federal law, enforced by and with federal resources. It has nothing to do with states or cities. You didn’t know that?oregonblitzkrieg said:Lets just dispense already with the false notion that sanctuary cities, their administrators and supporters have any bargaining power on this issue. They have no ground to stand on. They are operating against the law. Start arresting sanctuary city mayors, sanctuary state governors, make these faggots and their supporters understand that they are not in charge, that they don't have the authority to set immigration policy.
California has important work going on helping lead the world, and we choose not to waste our resources on trumpian foolishness.
That includes FEMA money, earthquake boy.
Where u been?
When that day comes, let's meat here and check in on California to see how they fared during this Troomp austerity program of which you speak. I'll bet you whatever you can afford that CA will still be (1) crowded, (2) expensive, (3) and a huge % of the economy. Investment capital will still be concentrated there, leading edge everything will still be happening there, and Mississippi and Idaho will still be stupid. -
Of course, new blood is good an healthy and has immense benefits to the cuntry. I'm not a nativist close the gates guy at all. I was fine with your peoples coming to this fine land with your oily hair, silk suites, and aficion para remo. I'm simply stating that there are probably some limits to how much low skilled immigration that melting pot can assimilate and absorb at one time. You can say fuck the low info / low skilled natives all you want, but if they get too pissed off they do dumb shit at the ballot box.creepycoug said:
Wrong.YellowSnow said:
I laffed, but this line of reasoning is just silly. There is absolutely no moral or ethical imperative for any nation to confer the benefit of its citizenship - inc. standard of living - to an unlimited number of humans around the globe. Yes, we all hit the geographical jackpot by being born in the US n' A and I recognize this. The fact that the United States has done more to raising living standards around the globe from the period 1945 to the present than any nation in history makes me feel less guilty about it.creepycoug said:
Yes, again. It is a free market. If he can take it, then they're overpaid or don't want it to begin with.oregonblitzkrieg said:Again with the hungry worker argument. But he's so HUNGRY it would be wrong not to let him in and take 3 jobs from US citizens, or from immigrants already living here. If he wants to work his ass off, he can do it in his own country and make that country better. If his own country doesn't let him, I'm sure he can find an open border alternative to the US. Germany maybe?
There should be no economic safety in the accident of where youtr dad humped your mom and where she was 9 mos. later. I'm with Gates on that point. If he's better at, or will do it as well and cheaper, then the job is his.
No good Republican would ever disagree with that. The labor people got in bed with the religious fundies and overtook my party. The party of Reagan.
If the goal is a greater society, like organizations, new blood is good an healthy.
I say again: make room for people who see this place and value it by kicking out those who see this place as a birthright. The welfare problem will be gone overnight.
The Salemkewg line has had over 100 years to figure it out, and still can't. Dispatch him and his ilk and make room for the guy who will send his kid to UW Medical School by starting a yard service.
Think about it. -
So, just like Mexico City. Got it.
-
well, there's that.YellowSnow said:
Of course, new blood is good an healthy and has immense benefits to the cuntry. I'm not a nativist close the gates guy at all. I was fine with your peoples coming to this fine land with your oily hair, silk suites, and aficion para remo. I'm simply stating that there are probably some limits to how much low skilled immigration that melting pot can assimilate and absorb at one time. You can say fuck the low info / low skilled natives all you want, but if they get too pissed off they do dumb shit at the ballot box.creepycoug said:
Wrong.YellowSnow said:
I laffed, but this line of reasoning is just silly. There is absolutely no moral or ethical imperative for any nation to confer the benefit of its citizenship - inc. standard of living - to an unlimited number of humans around the globe. Yes, we all hit the geographical jackpot by being born in the US n' A and I recognize this. The fact that the United States has done more to raising living standards around the globe from the period 1945 to the present than any nation in history makes me feel less guilty about it.creepycoug said:
Yes, again. It is a free market. If he can take it, then they're overpaid or don't want it to begin with.oregonblitzkrieg said:Again with the hungry worker argument. But he's so HUNGRY it would be wrong not to let him in and take 3 jobs from US citizens, or from immigrants already living here. If he wants to work his ass off, he can do it in his own country and make that country better. If his own country doesn't let him, I'm sure he can find an open border alternative to the US. Germany maybe?
There should be no economic safety in the accident of where youtr dad humped your mom and where she was 9 mos. later. I'm with Gates on that point. If he's better at, or will do it as well and cheaper, then the job is his.
No good Republican would ever disagree with that. The labor people got in bed with the religious fundies and overtook my party. The party of Reagan.
If the goal is a greater society, like organizations, new blood is good an healthy.
I say again: make room for people who see this place and value it by kicking out those who see this place as a birthright. The welfare problem will be gone overnight.
The Salemkewg line has had over 100 years to figure it out, and still can't. Dispatch him and his ilk and make room for the guy who will send his kid to UW Medical School by starting a yard service.
Think about it.
I knew appealing to the merits would get to your row boat ethos. No stars in a boat, right? No prima donnas. My kid's first rowing coach said to her, "yeah, you were born with the right body [thanks papa creep], but just know that this sport filters out the pretenders really FAST."
Let's you and me go through Idaho and Mississippi and filter out the pretenders. Like Castro did a few years back. Barge 'em up and shove 'em off. "You had your chance Bartholemew!" If they make it, it's the other cuntry's problem. If they drown, even better. -
I don't know what you're talking about, but I'm confident the right response is:doogie said:So, just like Mexico City. Got it.
"Wrong. No, you don't get it."
Like I said, let's check back in when it's over. -
We’ll both be over long before “it’s” over.
-
Now would be the right time to bust out a " You dumb fucking donkey" .creepycoug said:
I don't know what you're talking about, but I'm confident the right response is:doogie said:So, just like Mexico City. Got it.
"Wrong. No, you don't get it."
Like I said, let's check back in when it's over. -
Done and done. I'm one hell of a fly anger for landlocked trout (meth riddled Olympic Peninsula steelhead not so much) and me and Idaho go way back.creepycoug said:
well, there's that.YellowSnow said:
Of course, new blood is good an healthy and has immense benefits to the cuntry. I'm not a nativist close the gates guy at all. I was fine with your peoples coming to this fine land with your oily hair, silk suites, and aficion para remo. I'm simply stating that there are probably some limits to how much low skilled immigration that melting pot can assimilate and absorb at one time. You can say fuck the low info / low skilled natives all you want, but if they get too pissed off they do dumb shit at the ballot box.creepycoug said:
Wrong.YellowSnow said:
I laffed, but this line of reasoning is just silly. There is absolutely no moral or ethical imperative for any nation to confer the benefit of its citizenship - inc. standard of living - to an unlimited number of humans around the globe. Yes, we all hit the geographical jackpot by being born in the US n' A and I recognize this. The fact that the United States has done more to raising living standards around the globe from the period 1945 to the present than any nation in history makes me feel less guilty about it.creepycoug said:
Yes, again. It is a free market. If he can take it, then they're overpaid or don't want it to begin with.oregonblitzkrieg said:Again with the hungry worker argument. But he's so HUNGRY it would be wrong not to let him in and take 3 jobs from US citizens, or from immigrants already living here. If he wants to work his ass off, he can do it in his own country and make that country better. If his own country doesn't let him, I'm sure he can find an open border alternative to the US. Germany maybe?
There should be no economic safety in the accident of where youtr dad humped your mom and where she was 9 mos. later. I'm with Gates on that point. If he's better at, or will do it as well and cheaper, then the job is his.
No good Republican would ever disagree with that. The labor people got in bed with the religious fundies and overtook my party. The party of Reagan.
If the goal is a greater society, like organizations, new blood is good an healthy.
I say again: make room for people who see this place and value it by kicking out those who see this place as a birthright. The welfare problem will be gone overnight.
The Salemkewg line has had over 100 years to figure it out, and still can't. Dispatch him and his ilk and make room for the guy who will send his kid to UW Medical School by starting a yard service.
Think about it.
I knew appealing to the merits would get to your row boat ethos. No stars in a boat, right? No prima donnas. My kid's first rowing coach said to her, "yeah, you were born with the right body [thanks papa creep], but just know that this sport filters out the pretenders really FAST."
Let's you and me go through Idaho and Mississippi and filter out the pretenders. Like Castro did a few years back. Barge 'em up and shove 'em off. "You had your chance Bartholemew!" If they make it, it's the other cuntry's problem. If they drown, even better.


