I also love it when Kim scolds his paying customers for being too negative and the rest of the thread is devoted to a bunch of pussies thanking him for chastising everyone.
Hahahahaha. What a bizarre, backwards people those Sark cultists are.
Also, "ethics" were beaten to death during the Coach Willingham / Todd Turner regime. Every time somebody brought up bad football, the reply of "high ethics" was quickly delivered. Somehow "high ethics" were supposed to make up for crappy football. The problem is that nobody knew really what "high ethics" literally translated to. The only result fans saw was the occasional good player like Chambers leaving the team mysteriously. I mean, Neuheisel was held up as the counterexample, but even he followed the NCAA rules. Yes, and that includes the gambling (not going to rehash this but the rules were ambiguous and I foresee somebody complaining). All "ethics" was: a posture with no content. But we heard it endlessly.
I want what is best for this program and the best thing for this program is for the light to come on in Sark's head and win 10 games this season and in the future, not hiring another HC.
Comments
Pop off when you've coached or played college football.
Also, "ethics" were beaten to death during the Coach Willingham / Todd Turner regime. Every time somebody brought up bad football, the reply of "high ethics" was quickly delivered. Somehow "high ethics" were supposed to make up for crappy football. The problem is that nobody knew really what "high ethics" literally translated to. The only result fans saw was the occasional good player like Chambers leaving the team mysteriously. I mean, Neuheisel was held up as the counterexample, but even he followed the NCAA rules. Yes, and that includes the gambling (not going to rehash this but the rules were ambiguous and I foresee somebody complaining). All "ethics" was: a posture with no content. But we heard it endlessly.
I have a new favorite. . .
I want what is best for this program and the best thing for this program is for the light to come on in Sark's head and win 10 games this season and in the future, not hiring another HC.
So Sark had to step back last year and go 7-6 so he can step forward this year and go 7-6? Considering that 7-6>7-6>7-6>7-6, this makes sense.
After a season and a half of anything but average
After still thinking Sark had a shot after four and a half years
Doogs gotta doog. Even here