Could Ahmed be solution to struggling Husky offense?
Comments
-
The article was fine.RaceBannon said:One of the dumbest articles ever written on the sport of football.
The headline was MossterFS. -
I just read the headlinednc said:
The article was fine.RaceBannon said:One of the dumbest articles ever written on the sport of football.
The headline was MossterFS. -
Meek said:
I can pronounce it but I will confess that the first game where he played, I spent most of the time distracted because the announcers were calling him something other than what the letters suggested he should be called.LebamDawg said:I hope not - I can't pronounce his name
that was a frustrating game for me.
I'm drunk in my mom's basement going "Wait, what are you talking about...Ack? Ack? Seriously? Where's the K sound?"
"Wait, what did he say? Savon? The L the L motherfucker. It's Sal-von."
I don't think I even remembered who we were playing.
-
This. I get the ebb and flow excuse, but commit early to running, especially with our defense. The short runs often pay off later. We all know this, so why the fuck don't Pete and Smith?NorwegianHusky said:We have three other good RBs besides him. The solution would be getting rid of our marker-sniffing offensive coordinator who refuses to use them.
This team is good enough, and the offense is big and physical enough to just line up and go full Stanford against an undersized talentless defense like ASU's.
Our lone TD came on a long methodical drive, with 8 run plays. The problem is that our coaches care more about offensive identity than gameplanning and what actually fucking works.
Pete says they will move the ball however they can, but it's bullshit that's been proven to be bullshit multiple times since he has been the coach.
Gaskin should get 20+ carries. Coleman 10. We don't have good WR's. And the TE's outside Bryant are much better run blockers than receivers. We have a great defense. This is a team built to be run first. -
motherfucking thisNorwegianHusky said:We have three other good RBs besides him. The solution would be getting rid of our marker-sniffing offensive coordinator who refuses to use them.
This team is good enough, and the offense is big and physical enough to just line up and go full Stanford against an undersized talentless defense like ASU's.
Our lone TD came on a long methodical drive, with 8 run plays. The problem is that our coaches care more about offensive identity than gameplanning and what actually fucking works. -
When you have a stifling defense and a proven RB, why not run boring shit against a moderate to shitty defense until you force them out of their gameplan?
-
doogie said:
When you have a stifling defense and a proven RB, why not run boring shit against a moderate to shitty defense until you force them out of their gameplan?
-
Disagree.Swaye said:LoneStarDawg said:
Can you say if it’s a preliminary solution or a final solution?Swaye said:I can't say what the solution is for the Huskies offense because it might involve the death of someone.
I can't be banned from here. I have little else of value in my life.
-
Is pharmacy his real name or a nickname? either way how did you find out and who calls him that?PurpleBaze said:Meek said:
I can pronounce it but I will confess that the first game where he played, I spent most of the time distracted because the announcers were calling him something other than what the letters suggested he should be called.LebamDawg said:I hope not - I can't pronounce his name
that was a frustrating game for me.
I'm drunk in my mom's basement going "Wait, what are you talking about...Ack? Ack? Seriously? Where's the K sound?"
"Wait, what did he say? Savon? The L the L motherfucker. It's Sal-von."
I don't think I even remembered who we were playing. -
You dumbfuckers are denser than depleted uranium.
Every time you had the little Arab touch the ball, He went off.
But do keep giving the ball to Lavon Coleman.
