Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kelee Ringo, 5* 2020 DB, Scottsdale (Saguaro), AZ (Offered 12/7/17)

1343537394095

Comments

  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    Swaye said:

    Is this thread about Ringo or Lake? You retards.

    Both! How bout that!?!!
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    Kelee isn’t going to SC
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,589 Swaye's Wigwam

    Swaye said:

    Is this thread about Ringo or Lake? You retards.

    About ringo’s mom
    Pics?
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,231
    Baseman said:

    Tequilla said:

    My random take:

    From a $$$ standpoint Lake has been priced out of anything that isn’t s P5 job

    Due to geography, he’s probably not as realistic of a hire in some conferences vs others

    Bottom tier P5 jobs may not be viewed as overly attractive as there is a ton of risk in them and the pay often isn’t anything special

    High end P5 jobs (not named Washington) will likely pursue higher caliber/experienced candidates ... while Lake at SC could be really good ... the odds are that SC would never take the leap with him and prefer someone in their family because that’s what they do

    So by my count there are probably only a handful of jobs that are realistic and a number of them have just been filled in the last year or two

    At this point, Lake would have to be the favorite to be the next HC at Washington ... now whether that % is over 20-25% is a completely different question


    SC ain’t hiring Lake ... goes against their DNA

    Lake leaving as a HC would hurt us ... if he stays then we are the favorite but not sure enough of one at this point to combat the field

    The last 25 years, SC HCs with previous ties to the program failed—miserably. Carrol, the outsider, delivered different results
    • John Robinson — Trojan ties
    • Hackett — Trojan ties
    • Pete Carrol — Outsider
    • Laney Kirin — Trojan ties
    • Sark — Trojan ties
    • Clay Helton —Trojan ties
    The Robinson victory lap and Hackett the Hack: tired, old coaches. Carroll: energetic and defensive minded. 7 consecutive top 5 finishes, including two consecutive Natties. Kiffin: Charmin soft. Offense > Defense. Terminated on the Tarmac. Sark: a Drunk leading an undisplined team. Clay Helton: Fortnighter; awful recruiter. SC— where 5-stars go to die.

    SC will look for an outsider. Dynamic. Defensive minded. A successful recruiter, preferably with west coast ties. Discipline. Proven talent developer. A younger Pete Carrol without the baggage. Stable.

    Connect the dots...

    Then again, it’s SC, meaning theyll hire another HC with Trojan ties and continue losing

    SC rarely is smart

    Their next coach is a big name

    The Carroll vs Lake angle sounds nice until remembering that Petey was a HC prior
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Tequilla said:

    Baseman said:

    Tequilla said:

    My random take:

    From a $$$ standpoint Lake has been priced out of anything that isn’t s P5 job

    Due to geography, he’s probably not as realistic of a hire in some conferences vs others

    Bottom tier P5 jobs may not be viewed as overly attractive as there is a ton of risk in them and the pay often isn’t anything special

    High end P5 jobs (not named Washington) will likely pursue higher caliber/experienced candidates ... while Lake at SC could be really good ... the odds are that SC would never take the leap with him and prefer someone in their family because that’s what they do

    So by my count there are probably only a handful of jobs that are realistic and a number of them have just been filled in the last year or two

    At this point, Lake would have to be the favorite to be the next HC at Washington ... now whether that % is over 20-25% is a completely different question


    SC ain’t hiring Lake ... goes against their DNA

    Lake leaving as a HC would hurt us ... if he stays then we are the favorite but not sure enough of one at this point to combat the field

    The last 25 years, SC HCs with previous ties to the program failed—miserably. Carrol, the outsider, delivered different results
    • John Robinson — Trojan ties
    • Hackett — Trojan ties
    • Pete Carrol — Outsider
    • Laney Kirin — Trojan ties
    • Sark — Trojan ties
    • Clay Helton —Trojan ties
    The Robinson victory lap and Hackett the Hack: tired, old coaches. Carroll: energetic and defensive minded. 7 consecutive top 5 finishes, including two consecutive Natties. Kiffin: Charmin soft. Offense > Defense. Terminated on the Tarmac. Sark: a Drunk leading an undisplined team. Clay Helton: Fortnighter; awful recruiter. SC— where 5-stars go to die.

    SC will look for an outsider. Dynamic. Defensive minded. A successful recruiter, preferably with west coast ties. Discipline. Proven talent developer. A younger Pete Carrol without the baggage. Stable.

    Connect the dots...

    Then again, it’s SC, meaning theyll hire another HC with Trojan ties and continue losing

    SC rarely is smart

    Their next coach is a big name

    The Carroll vs Lake angle sounds nice until remembering that Petey was a HC prior
    And like their fourth choice
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,553 Founders Club

    Tequilla said:

    Baseman said:

    Tequilla said:

    My random take:

    From a $$$ standpoint Lake has been priced out of anything that isn’t s P5 job

    Due to geography, he’s probably not as realistic of a hire in some conferences vs others

    Bottom tier P5 jobs may not be viewed as overly attractive as there is a ton of risk in them and the pay often isn’t anything special

    High end P5 jobs (not named Washington) will likely pursue higher caliber/experienced candidates ... while Lake at SC could be really good ... the odds are that SC would never take the leap with him and prefer someone in their family because that’s what they do

    So by my count there are probably only a handful of jobs that are realistic and a number of them have just been filled in the last year or two

    At this point, Lake would have to be the favorite to be the next HC at Washington ... now whether that % is over 20-25% is a completely different question


    SC ain’t hiring Lake ... goes against their DNA

    Lake leaving as a HC would hurt us ... if he stays then we are the favorite but not sure enough of one at this point to combat the field

    The last 25 years, SC HCs with previous ties to the program failed—miserably. Carrol, the outsider, delivered different results
    • John Robinson — Trojan ties
    • Hackett — Trojan ties
    • Pete Carrol — Outsider
    • Laney Kirin — Trojan ties
    • Sark — Trojan ties
    • Clay Helton —Trojan ties
    The Robinson victory lap and Hackett the Hack: tired, old coaches. Carroll: energetic and defensive minded. 7 consecutive top 5 finishes, including two consecutive Natties. Kiffin: Charmin soft. Offense > Defense. Terminated on the Tarmac. Sark: a Drunk leading an undisplined team. Clay Helton: Fortnighter; awful recruiter. SC— where 5-stars go to die.

    SC will look for an outsider. Dynamic. Defensive minded. A successful recruiter, preferably with west coast ties. Discipline. Proven talent developer. A younger Pete Carrol without the baggage. Stable.

    Connect the dots...

    Then again, it’s SC, meaning theyll hire another HC with Trojan ties and continue losing

    SC rarely is smart

    Their next coach is a big name

    The Carroll vs Lake angle sounds nice until remembering that Petey was a HC prior
    And like their fourth choice
    and had been a HC in the NFL.
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,589 Swaye's Wigwam
    Yo, we’re getting little to no twitter love from Kelee. Whose writing the play book on how to coach dawg moms to recruit future dawgs moms? You guys think I’m fucking around here but unless we’re getting moms a purple challenger, I’m not seeing it right now.

    To be clear... I hope this ages horribly.