Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Harbaugh has spoken

2

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    salemcoog said:

    The players are free to poo poo the flag and the national anthem if they choose. And NFL owners and GMs are free to not sign them to a contract. NFL ratings are down and some of it is due to over exposure. But some of it is due to the protests as well. Trump put the NFL owners in a box as its clear that they won't publically condemn the protests other than maybe one or two of them. But it's also clear that if you're a marginal NFL player who continues to do this, there's a good chance you're out of a job should it benefit their teams cap and you may not catch on with another team the next Season. So if you're a marginal player who feels strong about the issue to continue this, hopefully you'll be able to survive on PE teacher salary.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,082

    salemcoog said:

    The players are free to poo poo the flag and the national anthem if they choose. And NFL owners and GMs are free to not sign them to a contract. NFL ratings are down and some of it is due to over exposure. But some of it is due to the protests as well. Trump put the NFL owners in a box as its clear that they won't publically condemn the protests other than maybe one or two of them. But it's also clear that if you're a marginal NFL player who continues to do this, there's a good chance you're out of a job should it benefit their teams cap and you may not catch on with another team the next Season. So if you're a marginal player who feels strong about the issue to continue this, hopefully you'll be able to survive on PE teacher salary.

    image
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    The US Dept of Defense paid the NFL millions to salute the troops:

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/defense-department-paid-5-4-million-nfl-honor-troops/

    Obama paid the NFL millions to be patriotic:

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2017/09/24/draft-n2385792

    The federal govt spends billions on private sports stadiums.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-the-federal-government-should-stop-spending-billions-on-private-sports-stadiums/

    The president meddles in private business because private business accepts a benefit from the federal government.
    So you are saying you would support Trump telling Exxon it should fire employees that speak out against the government because Exxon receives subsidies from the government.

    Da fuq?
    Are the NFL players speaking out against the federal government? If you are accepting a benefit/privilege from the government and engaging in inflammatory behavior, don't get you panties in a bunch if someone in the government gives their opinion of your behavior. Especially if it from a politician.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    The US Dept of Defense paid the NFL millions to salute the troops:

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/defense-department-paid-5-4-million-nfl-honor-troops/

    Obama paid the NFL millions to be patriotic:

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2017/09/24/draft-n2385792

    The federal govt spends billions on private sports stadiums.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-the-federal-government-should-stop-spending-billions-on-private-sports-stadiums/

    The president meddles in private business because private business accepts a benefit from the federal government.
    So you are saying you would support Trump telling Exxon it should fire employees that speak out against the government because Exxon receives subsidies from the government.

    Da fuq?
    Are the NFL players speaking out against the federal government? If you are accepting a benefit/privilege from the government and engaging in inflammatory behavior, don't get you panties in a bunch if someone in the government gives their opinion of your behavior. Especially if it from a politician.
    The owners get the benefit, not the players.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    The US Dept of Defense paid the NFL millions to salute the troops:

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/defense-department-paid-5-4-million-nfl-honor-troops/

    Obama paid the NFL millions to be patriotic:

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2017/09/24/draft-n2385792

    The federal govt spends billions on private sports stadiums.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-the-federal-government-should-stop-spending-billions-on-private-sports-stadiums/

    The president meddles in private business because private business accepts a benefit from the federal government.
    So you are saying you would support Trump telling Exxon it should fire employees that speak out against the government because Exxon receives subsidies from the government.

    Da fuq?
    Are the NFL players speaking out against the federal government? If you are accepting a benefit/privilege from the government and engaging in inflammatory behavior, don't get you panties in a bunch if someone in the government gives their opinion of your behavior. Especially if it from a politician.
    No they aren't and that's the point. Not to mention they aren't receiving the benefit. But continue being fucktarded.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,467 Founders Club

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    The US Dept of Defense paid the NFL millions to salute the troops:

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/defense-department-paid-5-4-million-nfl-honor-troops/

    Obama paid the NFL millions to be patriotic:

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2017/09/24/draft-n2385792

    The federal govt spends billions on private sports stadiums.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-the-federal-government-should-stop-spending-billions-on-private-sports-stadiums/

    The president meddles in private business because private business accepts a benefit from the federal government.
    So you are saying you would support Trump telling Exxon it should fire employees that speak out against the government because Exxon receives subsidies from the government.

    Da fuq?
    Are the NFL players speaking out against the federal government? If you are accepting a benefit/privilege from the government and engaging in inflammatory behavior, don't get you panties in a bunch if someone in the government gives their opinion of your behavior. Especially if it from a politician.
    The owners get the benefit, not the players.
    The $59k median house-hold income and I had a hearty chuckle at your poast.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:
    Kinda the more chinteresting thing outta this shitshow. Villanueva seems to be the only player having the slightest hint of team repercussions from his flag take. He's also the one most out of step with team unity since Kappy. Turns the thing on its head and back over again.
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    The US Dept of Defense paid the NFL millions to salute the troops:

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/defense-department-paid-5-4-million-nfl-honor-troops/

    Obama paid the NFL millions to be patriotic:

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2017/09/24/draft-n2385792

    The federal govt spends billions on private sports stadiums.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-the-federal-government-should-stop-spending-billions-on-private-sports-stadiums/

    The president meddles in private business because private business accepts a benefit from the federal government.
    So you are saying you would support Trump telling Exxon it should fire employees that speak out against the government because Exxon receives subsidies from the government.

    Da fuq?
    Are the NFL players speaking out against the federal government? If you are accepting a benefit/privilege from the government and engaging in inflammatory behavior, don't get you panties in a bunch if someone in the government gives their opinion of your behavior. Especially if it from a politician.
    No they aren't and that's the point. Not to mention they aren't receiving the benefit. But continue being fucktarded.
    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    The US Dept of Defense paid the NFL millions to salute the troops:

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/defense-department-paid-5-4-million-nfl-honor-troops/

    Obama paid the NFL millions to be patriotic:

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2017/09/24/draft-n2385792

    The federal govt spends billions on private sports stadiums.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-the-federal-government-should-stop-spending-billions-on-private-sports-stadiums/

    The president meddles in private business because private business accepts a benefit from the federal government.
    So you are saying you would support Trump telling Exxon it should fire employees that speak out against the government because Exxon receives subsidies from the government.

    Da fuq?
    Are the NFL players speaking out against the federal government? If you are accepting a benefit/privilege from the government and engaging in inflammatory behavior, don't get you panties in a bunch if someone in the government gives their opinion of your behavior. Especially if it from a politician.
    No they aren't and that's the point. Not to mention they aren't receiving the benefit. But continue being fucktarded.
    The players benefit indirectly and directly both from the tax structure and other income that contributes to paying player salaries. Trump is expressing his opinion, and you have a problem with that.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2017
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,467 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    You aren't bound by a normal functioning brain cell.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain

    Bored motto?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    And the President has to sign it into law. Which Obama did after submitting HIS proposed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to Congress for debate.

    Keep trying to argue it wasn't Obama's stimulus package that guaranteed the Solyndra loans. Keep trying. Come on. Keep blaming Congress and denying Obama had any responsibility for it. I mean, seriously, He was only the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, for fuck sake, whom signed the fucking bill into law. But no, blame congress.

    That brain of yours, Hondo. You need to return it for a better one.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    And the President has to sign it into law. Which Obama did after submitting HIS proposed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to Congress for debate.

    Keep trying to argue it wasn't Obama's stimulus package that guaranteed the Solyndra loans. Keep trying. Come on. Keep blaming Congress and denying Obama had any responsibility for it. I mean, seriously, He was only the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, for fuck sake, whom signed the fucking bill into law. But no, blame congress.

    That brain of yours, Hondo. You need to return it for a better one.
    It's clear you don't get it. I'm not saying Obama isn't fucktarded. I'm saying every politician was complicit in paying solyndra.

    Dumbass.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    And the President has to sign it into law. Which Obama did after submitting HIS proposed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to Congress for debate.

    Keep trying to argue it wasn't Obama's stimulus package that guaranteed the Solyndra loans. Keep trying. Come on. Keep blaming Congress and denying Obama had any responsibility for it. I mean, seriously, He was only the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, for fuck sake, whom signed the fucking bill into law. But no, blame congress.

    That brain of yours, Hondo. You need to return it for a better one.
    It's clear you don't get it. I'm not saying Obama isn't fucktarded. I'm saying every politician was complicit in paying solyndra.

    Dumbass.
    I know you're saying that, and you're wrong. And retarded. But mainly just wrong. It was an Obama led stimulus package he campaigned on and pushed through Congress.

    Regardless, this is Vintage Hondo: First, widen the field, then move the goalposts, then hide them or pretend they don't exist. It's okay, Hondo. You're Hondo! Vintage Hondo! Free Pub & All.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,467 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    It's cute how you think what you do is presenting an argument.

    It's actually sucking Hillary's cock. But please tell us again how you "hate that cunt"
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    It's cute how you think what you do is presenting an argument.

    It's actually sucking Hillary's cock. But please tell us again how you "hate that cunt"
    He's sucking Obama's cock on this one.

    Some of you need to learn the difference.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,467 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    It's cute how you think what you do is presenting an argument.

    It's actually sucking Hillary's cock. But please tell us again how you "hate that cunt"
    He's sucking Obama's cock on this one.

    Some of you need to learn the difference
    .
    Disagree.

    There is no difference.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    And the President has to sign it into law. Which Obama did after submitting HIS proposed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to Congress for debate.

    Keep trying to argue it wasn't Obama's stimulus package that guaranteed the Solyndra loans. Keep trying. Come on. Keep blaming Congress and denying Obama had any responsibility for it. I mean, seriously, He was only the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, for fuck sake, whom signed the fucking bill into law. But no, blame congress.

    That brain of yours, Hondo. You need to return it for a better one.
    It's clear you don't get it. I'm not saying Obama isn't fucktarded. I'm saying every politician was complicit in paying solyndra.

    Dumbass.
    I know you're saying that, and you're wrong. And retarded. But mainly just wrong. It was an Obama led stimulus package he campaigned on and pushed through Congress.

    Regardless, this is Vintage Hondo: First, widen the field, then move the goalposts, then hide them or pretend they don't exist. It's okay, Hondo. You're Hondo! Vintage Hondo! Free Pub & All.
    Just like Trump has pushed the Obamacare repeal, the border wall, defunding of planned Parenthood, and tax reform through Congress.

    Oh wait.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    It's cute how you think what you do is presenting an argument.

    It's actually sucking Hillary's cock. But please tell us again how you "hate that cunt"
    He's sucking Obama's cock on this one.

    Some of you need to learn the difference.
    TYFYS
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    I don't venture in here much...but how long have Boobs and ATV been tag-teaming the Tug?

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    And the President has to sign it into law. Which Obama did after submitting HIS proposed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to Congress for debate.

    Keep trying to argue it wasn't Obama's stimulus package that guaranteed the Solyndra loans. Keep trying. Come on. Keep blaming Congress and denying Obama had any responsibility for it. I mean, seriously, He was only the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, for fuck sake, whom signed the fucking bill into law. But no, blame congress.

    That brain of yours, Hondo. You need to return it for a better one.
    It's clear you don't get it. I'm not saying Obama isn't fucktarded. I'm saying every politician was complicit in paying solyndra.

    Dumbass.
    I know you're saying that, and you're wrong. And retarded. But mainly just wrong. It was an Obama led stimulus package he campaigned on and pushed through Congress.

    Regardless, this is Vintage Hondo: First, widen the field, then move the goalposts, then hide them or pretend they don't exist. It's okay, Hondo. You're Hondo! Vintage Hondo! Free Pub & All.
    Just like Trump has pushed the Obamacare repeal, the border wall, defunding of planned Parenthood, and tax reform through Congress.

    Oh wait.
    Ho-Lee-Fuck! I think you finally get it!

    Did you get electrocuted or something?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,894 Founders Club
    MisterEm said:

    I don't venture in here much...but how long have Boobs and ATV been tag-teaming the Tug?

    They bonded over their despair over Hillary losing
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Triggered Treaty?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    It takes a real desperate person to quote Harbaugh in here. And what does the Constitution have to do with privately owned and operated franchises?

    Harbaugh: Check your brain.

    Ask the president that exact question. Why does the president meddle in private business?
    Honestly, Hondo, I don't know how you tie your shoes with that brain.

    The Constitution applies to State Action, actions by the state, your government, the government, whatever level it's at, municipal, towns, cities, etc.

    I know it's hard, but the "Seattle Seahawks" are not owned and operated by the City of Seattle. So it's not a First Amendment issue, as Harbaugh and yourself believe it is.
    Da fuq? I never said anything about the Seahawks. Yes they are a private business, that's the point.

    Are you also saying Trump is not bound by the Constitution now?
    A president is bound by the Constitution when he commits presidential acts and conducts presidential business.

    He's can also, as a human being, regardless of his position, express opinions on everything from the NFL, to hot bitches, to the fact that you're dumber than a brick, without consulting or abiding by any constitutional requirement.

    Meddling in private business? You mean like Obama giving half a billion to Solyndra? Are you presidential scholars for real?

    Get back to the fryer before we have to talk about your flair.
    image
    Obama didn't give money to solyndra. Congress did. Nice show of intelligence tho.
    "Congress did." Actually not a single R supported it in the House and only 3 Rs supported it in the Senate.

    In a March 2009 press release announcing a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, the Energy Department said: “This loan guarantee will be supported through the President’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provides tens of billions of dollars in loan guarantee authority to build a new green energy economy.” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, confirmed that Solyndra’s funding came solely from section 1705.

    It was Obama's baby, bitch. All the way. Deny the facts in vain.
    Congress has to pass the bill. And every Republican put their pet project in it as well. It's almost like you don't have a basic understanding of how our government works.

    At least you try to argue unlike paws.
    And the President has to sign it into law. Which Obama did after submitting HIS proposed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to Congress for debate.

    Keep trying to argue it wasn't Obama's stimulus package that guaranteed the Solyndra loans. Keep trying. Come on. Keep blaming Congress and denying Obama had any responsibility for it. I mean, seriously, He was only the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, for fuck sake, whom signed the fucking bill into law. But no, blame congress.

    That brain of yours, Hondo. You need to return it for a better one.
    It's clear you don't get it. I'm not saying Obama isn't fucktarded. I'm saying every politician was complicit in paying solyndra.

    Dumbass.
    I know you're saying that, and you're wrong. And retarded. But mainly just wrong. It was an Obama led stimulus package he campaigned on and pushed through Congress.

    Regardless, this is Vintage Hondo: First, widen the field, then move the goalposts, then hide them or pretend they don't exist. It's okay, Hondo. You're Hondo! Vintage Hondo! Free Pub & All.
    Just like Trump has pushed the Obamacare repeal, the border wall, defunding of planned Parenthood, and tax reform through Congress.

    Oh wait.
    Ho-Lee-Fuck! I think you finally get it!

    Did you get electrocuted or something?
    You still don't get it.