CuntWaffles useless post scrimmage grades
Comments
-
#rappculturerustysavage said:
My brother repeatedly said, man Rapp is bringing the wood. I agreed.CuntWaffle said:
I didn't say he was bad. You just didn't see him stand out because that's how football works. Sometimes the plays just don't happen around you. I think Jordan Miller will be fine.WilburHooksHands said:
Rapp hit a lot of guys and they went down immediately. They also sent him on a blitz at least once.CuntWaffle said:Miller didn't stand out but he didn't not stand out? I didn't feel like he got beat a bunch.
I also didn't see much of Rapp tonight but that doesn't mean he's not good. That's football sometimes the plays just don't come to you.
Our secondary was fucking fantastic tonight for the first game post Budda/Sidney/King. Smoke a joint and rellllllaxxxxxxx.... -
I'd agree with you if BBK could tackle worth a shit. But, he can't. So, Disagree and do not understand how you can call him a "good" football player, versus mediocre or below. Just being around the play, like he was all night, is not enough. He needs to make plays, and he missed or blew more plays last night than he made. Numerous running plays where he had hands on a guy after a 1 yard gain, but got dragged 6 yards downfield come to mind.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm an admitted BBK fan, but because he is an undersized white guy, you guys blow his bad plays out of proportion.Dawgs4ever said:Our backup LBs are hot garbage. None of the LBs out there last night look like P12 LBs, much less SEC LBs. Burr kiven belongs on a team like Montana.
Pettis saved the 8-4 season to come.
He's active. He does make plays. You aren't wrong because he would have a hard time sniffing the field at Alabama or LSU, but you guys exaggerate and pretend like he sucks. He's a good football player, but he needs to play a specific role. With Victor and Beavers out, he gets exposed.
This is where football IQ really counts. BBK needs to realize his strengths and weaknesses, then play to his strengths. He has good speed, which could make him disruptive and a good pass defender, but he's not big or strong enough to move guards around or lay the lumber on RBs coming around the corner. Grab on, wrap up, slow the RBs down and wait for the help if you can't make the tackle yourself. And work on your fucking tackling, Fabio! Goddamn! -
Rutgers may still suck, but they actually had a great game plan against UW. Victor is out, attack the middle of the d that is using a tiny MIL. Eat up clock and and concentrate on just getting first downs. Try to win a 17-10 type of game. Our athletes thwarted that with the turnovers and special teams.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm an admitted BBK fan, but because he is an undersized white guy, you guys blow his bad plays out of proportion.Dawgs4ever said:Our backup LBs are hot garbage. None of the LBs out there last night look like P12 LBs, much less SEC LBs. Burr kiven belongs on a team like Montana.
Pettis saved the 8-4 season to come.
He's active. He does make plays. You aren't wrong because he would have a hard time sniffing the field at Alabama or LSU, but you guys exaggerate and pretend like he sucks. He's a good football player, but he needs to play a specific role. With Victor and Beavers out, he gets exposed.
On d, blitz the shit out of browning and force him to make mistakes. Every team in conference will probabaly try this so Sample and Gaskin on dump offs is going to be pivotal. They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Time to Ride the Lightning Huff you goofy looking mother fucker. -
Considering how bad the Asian 12 plays defense the Rutgers front may be among the best we play
-
That was a GOOD Rutgers team
-
@Haie writes: They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Question is why we literally have no quick strike plays in our offense, and prefer time-consuming, dangerous lobs near the goal line, instead. Fuck! -
Browning's shit ball probabaly makes those kind of routes impossible without serious threat of getting picked.TurdBuffer said:@Haie writes: They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Question is why we literally have no quick strike plays in our offense, and prefer time-consuming, dangerous lobs near the goal line, instead. Fuck! -
I should just stop axing these kinds of questions. The answers only make me feel worse.haie said:
Browning's shit ball probabaly makes those kind of routes impossible without serious threat of getting picked.TurdBuffer said:@Haie writes: They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Question is why we literally have no quick strike plays in our offense, and prefer time-consuming, dangerous lobs near the goal line, instead. Fuck! -
This is so sad but true. Stanford is the only one I can think of that MIGHT be as good or better and that's just based off of their past teams, I really have no idea. Utah I guess could be too as they usually always have some big fucking Polys.RaceBannon said:Considering how bad the Asian 12 plays defense the Rutgers front may be among the best we play
USC for sure will be better but I'm hoping they shit their pants during the season so we don't have to play them in the P12 title. -
CuntWaffle said:
This is so sad but true. Stanford is the only one I can think of that MIGHT be as good or better and that's just based off of their past teams, I really have no idea. Utah I guess could be too as they usually always have some big fucking Polys.RaceBannon said:Considering how bad the Asian 12 plays defense the Rutgers front may be among the best we play
USC for sure will be better but I'm hoping they shit their pants during the season so the cuog doesnt have to play them in the P12 title.
