Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fa'atui Tuitele, 5* 2019 DL, Honolulu (St. Louis), HI (COMMITTED)
Comments
-
Free Pub!!!Tequilla said:
This is the most fucktarded thing that I've ever seen ... if this fucker has a Twitter account please post ... I'm too lazy to go looking for it ... but definitely interested in tooling the fucker on his "knowledge"purpledoogfan said:
Memnoch8701: Washington's defense allowed a 65.2% completion rate and snagged 14 interceptions with their SOS @ #60 of 130 while Oregon defense was slightly better at a completion % of 55.1 with the 58th ranked strength of schedule. Oregon snagged 16 interceptions last year. Washington rotated their secondary pretty heavily I believe in 2017 and everyone got playing time. Nine DBs saw the field last year. Oregon rotated six or seven. Keep player development in mind while gauging their current year and performance against slightly inferior competition in regards to Washingtons SOS vs Oregon.jhfstyle24 said:http://www.oregonlive.com/recruiting/index.ssf/2018/02/faatui_tuitele_5-star_dt_from.html#incart_river_index
"Good analysis of Washington's D vs. Ducks. Oregon has the edge in the DB area...LB is a push...Washington is much better on the DL. Ducks D will be able to hang with Huskies' offense in '18. "
"Graham starts at Washington guaranteed."
Wheeeeeeeee
Your most productive returning DB is All Pac 12 First Team select Junior Taylor Rapp. In 13 games he tallied 42 solo tackles 1 int, 0 passes defended (either bad positioning or lack of attempts to his side, judging from his tackle output I'd say he's not very good at defending passes but a great tackler) and 1 forced fumble.
Oregon most productive returning DB is Senior Ugo Amadi. In 13 games he tallied 31 solo tackles 4 int, 8 passes defended (in good position to make plays and his int numbers back that up) 2 fumble recoveries and 1 defensive touchdown and 3 forced fumble.
Following Rapp is All Pac 12 Second Team Junior DB JoJo McIntosh who in 12 games tallied 37 solo tackles 1 int, 1 defended pass and 1 fumble recovery. Starter.
Following Amadi is Oregon Sophomore Thomas Graham Jr. As a freshman in 2017 in 13 games as a starter, he tallied 49 solo tackles, 3 int, 4 passes defended and 1 fumble recovery.
So I'll pause and provide a bit of context before continuing. Oregon's defense leaves only 3 DBs on the field as they have 4 DL, 3LB, with a Hybrid FS/LB up at the line (Fotu Leiato) alongside the LBs. This leaves the corners on an island. Graham outperformed 2 All Pac 12 selectees, against somewhat superior competition, on an island by himself...as a freshman.
Austin Joyner, a junior in 2017 is next with 35 solo tackles in 11 games 1 int, 1 pass defense and 1 fumble recovery. Shrugs.
Next behind Graham we have another Freshman. Deommodore Lenoir. In 12 games he tallied 17 solo tackles 1 int with 5 passes defended.
Washingtons best freshman was pretty good in 6 games. 13 solo tackles, 2 interceptions, 7 defended passes and 1 forced fumble.
I didn't forget Miles Bryant or Jordan Miller. I just figured they are a bit further down the totem pole on the roster and my entire point was to counter your theory regarding the starters in the secondary on both squads.
I'll add to that by saying I believe Washington upgraded at the safety position by signing Julius Irvin. If he doesn't start in 2018 I'll be shocked. Kwiatkowski is a great coordinator. Formidable even, but whether he can develop a player remains to be seen. Shaq and Budda were going to be good regardless. Taylor Rapp is coming along but I expected more from him by this time. Leavitt is a better developer of talent (Arrion Springs 2016 vs 2017 was like night and day) and an even better Defensive coordinator as is evident by the huge jump from 116 in 2016 to 46 in 2017. I see Brendan Schooler who started at safety for Oregon in 2017 either transferring or backing up either Jevon Holland or Steve Stephens. Both highly rated recruits. Time Will tell but I'll wager that Oregon has a top 5-10 defense in 2018. Too much speed, to many coaches who are proven developers of talent and too much talent. Imagine:
Steve Stephens (Best coverage corner in the class, Ed Reed comparisons galore) and Jevon Holland are immediate plug and play starters at the safety spots. Hollins,Dye and 4 star burner (watch his highlight tape, he's a 6'3 210-215 pound gazelle. Hawks RB with 15-20 yrd head start down from behind) Jackson at the LB position with Fotu at the Duck LB/Safety Hybrid position. Miami DE transfer Johnson and Jelks at DE with Scott in the middle. Graham and Amadi start on the outside islands with Deommodore at the slot. I'm stoked for this season. I don't think Washington has better corners and I think we'll be seeing you at the top this season.
Dear god people are fucking stupid -
So you posted a pic of a kid doing drills in some workout clothes that didn’t make him look flattering and questioned whether we wanted said player and drove that point home by comparing Levi (genetic freak) vs Qualls (somewhat sloppy body type but very good player). How else am I supposed to interpret your comments? They seem quite clear to me.BallzDeep said:
Go back to the Bandes thread and read my response. Again here you are putting words into my mouth and taking it to the extreme like a bitch.Tequilla said:
Way too much flab in that spandex ... what do you think @BallzDeep you fucktard?CuntWaffle said:
Mehhhh. Shitload of bad weight on him. We need more guys that look like Levi and less like Qualls. Hard pass for me now.
It’s not an iron clad law, but by and large when I see that we offer a kid 2+ years before Signing Day, that tells me that the coaches saw something in him that they really liked.
My point has never been about Bandes you ignorant twit because I haven’t even watched his film to figure out whether he’s worth a shit or not. The coaches have though and apparently seem to think so. But you’re right ... we shouldn’t want because you saw a pic where he looked a tad sloppy. That’s some Sark level doogman fucktarded shit.
And as for any “not impressed with his film” comments ... guess who’s JR film DDY didn’t care much for? Hampton’s. What’s DDY’s opinion of him now? Loves him. Point being things change and kids get better in a number of different ways.
If a kid has some flab around the gut ... pretty sure that Socha can fix that -
Sounds to me like I "trust the coaches". I'm ok with that over some teen boy analysis on here.Tequilla said:
So you posted a pic of a kid doing drills in some workout clothes that didn’t make him look flattering and questioned whether we wanted said player and drove that point home by comparing Levi (genetic freak) vs Qualls (somewhat sloppy body type but very good player). How else am I supposed to interpret your comments? They seem quite clear to me.BallzDeep said:
Go back to the Bandes thread and read my response. Again here you are putting words into my mouth and taking it to the extreme like a bitch.Tequilla said:
Way too much flab in that spandex ... what do you think @BallzDeep you fucktard?CuntWaffle said:
Mehhhh. Shitload of bad weight on him. We need more guys that look like Levi and less like Qualls. Hard pass for me now.
It’s not an iron clad law, but by and large when I see that we offer a kid 2+ years before Signing Day, that tells me that the coaches saw something in him that they really liked.
My point has never been about Bandes you ignorant twit because I haven’t even watched his film to figure out whether he’s worth a shit or not. The coaches have though and apparently seem to think so. But you’re right ... we shouldn’t want because you saw a pic where he looked a tad sloppy. That’s some Sark level doogman fucktarded shit.
And as for any “not impressed with his film” comments ... guess who’s JR film DDY didn’t care much for? Hampton’s. What’s DDY’s opinion of him now? Loves him. Point being things change and kids get better in a number of different ways.
If a kid has some flab around the gut ... pretty sure that Socha can fix that -
Tequilla said:
So you posted a pic of a kid doing drills in some workout clothes that didn’t make him look flattering and questioned whether we wanted said player and drove that point home by comparing Levi (genetic freak) vs Qualls (somewhat sloppy body type but very good player). How else am I supposed to interpret your comments? They seem quite clear to me.BallzDeep said:
Go back to the Bandes thread and read my response. Again here you are putting words into my mouth and taking it to the extreme like a bitch.Tequilla said:
Way too much flab in that spandex ... what do you think @BallzDeep you fucktard?CuntWaffle said:
Mehhhh. Shitload of bad weight on him. We need more guys that look like Levi and less like Qualls. Hard pass for me now.
It’s not an iron clad law, but by and large when I see that we offer a kid 2+ years before Signing Day, that tells me that the coaches saw something in him that they really liked.
My point has never been about Bandes you ignorant twit because I haven’t even watched his film to figure out whether he’s worth a shit or not. The coaches have though and apparently seem to think so. But you’re right ... we shouldn’t want because you saw a pic where he looked a tad sloppy. That’s some Sark level doogman fucktarded shit.
And as for any “not impressed with his film” comments ... guess who’s JR film DDY didn’t care much for? Hampton’s. What’s DDY’s opinion of him now? Loves him. Point being things change and kids get better in a number of different ways.
If a kid has some flab around the gut ... pretty sure that Socha can fix that
FREE PUB! -
I’m not all about the “trust the coaches” narrative because it can be lazy ... at the same time their track record largely suggests they know what they are doingwhuggy said:
Sounds to me like I "trust the coaches". I'm ok with that over some teen boy analysis on here.Tequilla said:
So you posted a pic of a kid doing drills in some workout clothes that didn’t make him look flattering and questioned whether we wanted said player and drove that point home by comparing Levi (genetic freak) vs Qualls (somewhat sloppy body type but very good player). How else am I supposed to interpret your comments? They seem quite clear to me.BallzDeep said:
Go back to the Bandes thread and read my response. Again here you are putting words into my mouth and taking it to the extreme like a bitch.Tequilla said:
Way too much flab in that spandex ... what do you think @BallzDeep you fucktard?CuntWaffle said:
Mehhhh. Shitload of bad weight on him. We need more guys that look like Levi and less like Qualls. Hard pass for me now.
It’s not an iron clad law, but by and large when I see that we offer a kid 2+ years before Signing Day, that tells me that the coaches saw something in him that they really liked.
My point has never been about Bandes you ignorant twit because I haven’t even watched his film to figure out whether he’s worth a shit or not. The coaches have though and apparently seem to think so. But you’re right ... we shouldn’t want because you saw a pic where he looked a tad sloppy. That’s some Sark level doogman fucktarded shit.
And as for any “not impressed with his film” comments ... guess who’s JR film DDY didn’t care much for? Hampton’s. What’s DDY’s opinion of him now? Loves him. Point being things change and kids get better in a number of different ways.
If a kid has some flab around the gut ... pretty sure that Socha can fix that -
Fuck you you stupid ignorant fuck ...BallzDeep said:@Tequilla "I trust the coaches" is exactly what you're saying you stupid doog. You exposed yourself. You have no fucking opinion of your own. You follow star ratings and "trust the coaches". You don't do any critical thinking of your own. Doogman is your home and where you belong you stupid sheep with an endless doog boner for any recruit with a UW offer and 4-stars next to his name.
I don’t give 2 shits about the stars next to a kid’s name and I don’t typically watch video of a kid until either he commits or they sign their LOI
The reason I’m willing to LIPO with a grown up staff is because they have a track record of success. We don’t offer every kid and their entourage. We offer kids that fit what we are looking for both on/off the field.
Seriously go fuck yourself for thinking that I just look at recruiting ratings and don’t have an opinion on my own you fucktarded piss ant -
Aids is strong in this thread
-
bored mottoWeakarmCobra said:Aids is strong in this thread
-
Did we tell his hs coach to fuck off yet?
-
Come on guys, not in the middle of the store...
