Trump's polls in the gutter
Comments
-
But according to the liberal Washingon Post, if the election were held today Trump still beats Hillary and also wins the popular vote.
-
Everyone loves free shit until they have to pay for it.allpurpleallgold said:
I think you're just bitter that your non establishment candidate was extinguished and Bernie keeps on burning.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Everybody loves the senile offensive line coach but nobody wants to actually see him running the show.dhdawg said:a ton of the loss from the democratic party's popularity has been among their own base.
yet the same assholes who got us in this mess refuse to GTFO and leave. now Chelsea is running for congress? fuck off.
a message must be sent in the 2018 primary to avoid a catastrophe. The corrupt, tired, weak, unlikeable party establishment must go.
Bernie Sanders meanwhile is the most popular politician in America who wants to help them and they just want to spit in his eye because "he's not a real dem!" (aka not a hopeless loser like you guys).
Tulsi Gabbard would be a nightmare for trump to run against. strong, progressive, principled. my guess is she runs in 2020 and the democratic party smears her to ensure some corrupt asshole like Andrew Cuomo or Cory Booker is the nominee.
I'm sick of seeing Nancy Pelosi's ugly face used in ad's against the democratic party when no one in the base even likes Pelosi to begin with
He's not popular because he's not Trump, being not Trump doesn't work as my original post showed. The dems were banking on being not Trump and now they're even loss popular. Bernie is popular because he ran on a bunch of policies that are hugely popular. It just took America a little while to figure it out because the @dnc and media were playing defense against him. -
We don't deal in hypotheticals here.HanseeHall78 said:But according to the liberal Washingon Post, if the election were held today Trump still beats Hillary and also wins the popular vote.
He won. -
The polls were close election night. Stop getting your news from Huffpo.HuskyJW said:
So polls matter again? Election Night be damned I guessallpurpleallgold said:Democrats somehow worse.
53% disapprove of Trump
42% approve
Although only 2% of the people that voted for him say they regret it.
67% say the Democratic Party is out of touch with the concerns of most Americans. Which is more than those that say that about Trump and the Republican Party.
What would happen if we redid election today? 96% of Trump supporters would vote for him. Only 85% of Clinton supporters say they'd vote for her again. Giving Trump a 43-40 percent Trump win.
I gambled with my support of Trump. I needed one of two things, Trump to succeed or the Democratic Party to die. And the Democratic Party is fucking dead.
Some people have been critical of Trumps first 100 days but he delivered for me. 10 out 10, would support again.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S8-CmuagWkw -
I thank Killary and her goon squad for keeping that commie loon out of the race.
-
didn't know about the bannon shit. I can see where there would be some agreement.NEsnake12 said:
Tulsi is by far the Dem's best and most realistic chance at beating Trump in 2020. But it'll be a rough road out of the primary process, which is still broken as fuck. She'd need a full fledged endorsement from Bernie to secure the progressive base 100%, and be able to dodge all the inevitable attacks that would come at her, namely:dhdawg said:Tulsi Gabbard would be a nightmare for trump to run against. strong, progressive, principled. my guess is she runs in 2020 and the democratic party smears her to ensure some corrupt asshole like Andrew Cuomo or Cory Booker is the nominee.
- Meeting with Assad in Syria a few months back and raising skepticism about whether he was behind the recent chemical weapon attakcs
- The fact that she's close with Steve Bannon. Has met with him many times and didn't oppose his appointment to the NSC.
The shittiest part of Dem establishment will desperately try to attack her on those points... for example:
But if the party is truly broken like APAG thinks it is, she has a shot.
Her domestic policy is mostly diametrically opposed to what bannon stands for
-
Tulsi is an Assad-apologizing, anti gay, Hindu supremacist. I'll pass.NEsnake12 said:
Tulsi is by far the Dem's best and most realistic chance at beating Trump in 2020. But it'll be a rough road out of the primary process, which is still broken as fuck. She'd need a full fledged endorsement from Bernie to secure the progressive base 100%, and be able to dodge all the inevitable attacks that would come at her, namely:dhdawg said:Tulsi Gabbard would be a nightmare for trump to run against. strong, progressive, principled. my guess is she runs in 2020 and the democratic party smears her to ensure some corrupt asshole like Andrew Cuomo or Cory Booker is the nominee.
- Meeting with Assad in Syria a few months back and raising skepticism about whether he was behind the recent chemical weapon attakcs
- The fact that she's close with Steve Bannon. Has met with him many times and didn't oppose his appointment to the NSC.
The shittiest part of Dem establishment will desperately try to attack her on those points... for example:
But if the party is truly broken like APAG thinks it is, she has a shot. -
She's wood hit material but there's not a chance in hell she's beating the Donald/Ivanka in 2020.NEsnake12 said:
Tulsi is by far the Dem's best and most realistic chance at beating Trump in 2020. But it'll be a rough road out of the primary process, which is still broken as fuck. She'd need a full fledged endorsement from Bernie to secure the progressive base 100%, and be able to dodge all the inevitable attacks that would come at her, namely:dhdawg said:Tulsi Gabbard would be a nightmare for trump to run against. strong, progressive, principled. my guess is she runs in 2020 and the democratic party smears her to ensure some corrupt asshole like Andrew Cuomo or Cory Booker is the nominee.
- Meeting with Assad in Syria a few months back and raising skepticism about whether he was behind the recent chemical weapon attakcs
- The fact that she's close with Steve Bannon. Has met with him many times and didn't oppose his appointment to the NSC.
The shittiest part of Dem establishment will desperately try to attack her on those points... for example:
But if the party is truly broken like APAG thinks it is, she has a shot.
Howard Dean is out there being a dick again. John Kasich is making the rounds trying to position himself at an alternate candidate in 2020. And the folks who voted for the Donald haven't budged an inch in their approval ratings.
Keep up the violent protests and the cute red/green signs at town meetings. The silent will vote just the same as they did last time.
-
Donald relies on the other side's nominee being slightly less shitty than he is.PurpleThrobber said:
She's wood hit material but there's not a chance in hell she's beating the Donald/Ivanka in 2020.NEsnake12 said:
Tulsi is by far the Dem's best and most realistic chance at beating Trump in 2020. But it'll be a rough road out of the primary process, which is still broken as fuck. She'd need a full fledged endorsement from Bernie to secure the progressive base 100%, and be able to dodge all the inevitable attacks that would come at her, namely:dhdawg said:Tulsi Gabbard would be a nightmare for trump to run against. strong, progressive, principled. my guess is she runs in 2020 and the democratic party smears her to ensure some corrupt asshole like Andrew Cuomo or Cory Booker is the nominee.
- Meeting with Assad in Syria a few months back and raising skepticism about whether he was behind the recent chemical weapon attakcs
- The fact that she's close with Steve Bannon. Has met with him many times and didn't oppose his appointment to the NSC.
The shittiest part of Dem establishment will desperately try to attack her on those points... for example:
But if the party is truly broken like APAG thinks it is, she has a shot.
Howard Dean is out there being a dick again. John Kasich is making the rounds trying to position himself at an alternate candidate in 2020. And the folks who voted for the Donald haven't budged an inch in their approval ratings.
Keep up the violent protests and the cute red/green signs at town meetings. The silent will vote just the same as they did last time.
As I said. if it's Andrew Cuomo or cory booker, he will win. If it's somebody anti-establishment he will lose miserably.
You say his support hasn't budged thus far. But presidents are at their highest approval when they are just elected. he's just getting started.
-
thanks neera tandenIntersectional_Dawg said:
Tulsi is an Assad-apologizing, anti gay, Hindu supremacist. I'll pass.NEsnake12 said:
Tulsi is by far the Dem's best and most realistic chance at beating Trump in 2020. But it'll be a rough road out of the primary process, which is still broken as fuck. She'd need a full fledged endorsement from Bernie to secure the progressive base 100%, and be able to dodge all the inevitable attacks that would come at her, namely:dhdawg said:Tulsi Gabbard would be a nightmare for trump to run against. strong, progressive, principled. my guess is she runs in 2020 and the democratic party smears her to ensure some corrupt asshole like Andrew Cuomo or Cory Booker is the nominee.
- Meeting with Assad in Syria a few months back and raising skepticism about whether he was behind the recent chemical weapon attakcs
- The fact that she's close with Steve Bannon. Has met with him many times and didn't oppose his appointment to the NSC.
The shittiest part of Dem establishment will desperately try to attack her on those points... for example:
But if the party is truly broken like APAG thinks it is, she has a shot.
