Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What would have Jake Locker been like under Petersen?

123468

Comments

  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Locker is in the same IQ range as Jeremiah Masoli, maybe a bit dumber. Since QBs need grey matter to succeed, I'm not sure he would have done well in Chip Kelly's offense.
  • Intersectional_Dawg
    Intersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524
    AZDuck said:

    Locker is in the same IQ range as Jeremiah Masoli, maybe a bit dumber. Since QBs need grey matter to succeed, I'm not sure he would have done well in Chip Kelly's offense.

    Mastoli! Roflmao!
  • Intersectional_Dawg
    Intersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524

    AZDuck said:

    Locker is in the same IQ range as Jeremiah Masoli, maybe a bit dumber. Since QBs need grey matter to succeed, I'm not sure he would have done well in Chip Kelly's offense.

    Mastoli! Roflmao!
    Hide your lap top!
    I bet he tried to smoke it first!!1!
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223

    Tequilla said:


    I'll never get the Locker hate, but for Christ's sake, if you've been paying any attention at all to the last three years then you know the whole fucking team would have been much better.

    It's why I don't understand the Locker hate and why this is even really a question ...

    Locker had all the tools necessary to be a good QB ...

    He never really was in a great position from a development, coaching, or team position to grow into a truly elite level player.

    I don't blame him one bit for walking away from the NFL ... if you aren't 100% in ... then you should be 100% out.
    He had all the tools except he was not smart and he was not accurate. Both can be improved with coaching, but on some level he was lacking naturally in both those areas.
    Listening to players from the 70s they'd tell you that Terry Bradshaw was beyond stupid ...

    I don't think you have to be a Mensa to be a good QB ... sometimes those that are smarter can get into ruts where they overthink things (something I am guilty of from time to time). Sometimes ignorance can be bliss where you just go and aren't slowed down by excess thought.

    It'll obviously never be proven one way or another but I can envision where Locker would have been a very good QB at UW and very good NFL QB. Talent by itself doesn't get you everywhere. Locker had it. But a lot of other things for one reason or another were not where they needed to be.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:


    I'll never get the Locker hate, but for Christ's sake, if you've been paying any attention at all to the last three years then you know the whole fucking team would have been much better.

    It's why I don't understand the Locker hate and why this is even really a question ...

    Locker had all the tools necessary to be a good QB ...

    He never really was in a great position from a development, coaching, or team position to grow into a truly elite level player.

    I don't blame him one bit for walking away from the NFL ... if you aren't 100% in ... then you should be 100% out.
    He had all the tools except he was not smart and he was not accurate. Both can be improved with coaching, but on some level he was lacking naturally in both those areas.
    Listening to players from the 70s they'd tell you that Terry Bradshaw was beyond stupid ...

    I don't think you have to be a Mensa to be a good QB ... sometimes those that are smarter can get into ruts where they overthink things (something I am guilty of from time to time). Sometimes ignorance can be bliss where you just go and aren't slowed down by excess thought.

    It'll obviously never be proven one way or another but I can envision where Locker would have been a very good QB at UW and very good NFL QB. Talent by itself doesn't get you everywhere. Locker had it. But a lot of other things for one reason or another were not where they needed to be.
    Just get out there and #ripit?
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:


    I'll never get the Locker hate, but for Christ's sake, if you've been paying any attention at all to the last three years then you know the whole fucking team would have been much better.

    It's why I don't understand the Locker hate and why this is even really a question ...

    Locker had all the tools necessary to be a good QB ...

    He never really was in a great position from a development, coaching, or team position to grow into a truly elite level player.

    I don't blame him one bit for walking away from the NFL ... if you aren't 100% in ... then you should be 100% out.
    He had all the tools except he was not smart and he was not accurate. Both can be improved with coaching, but on some level he was lacking naturally in both those areas.
    Listening to players from the 70s they'd tell you that Terry Bradshaw was beyond stupid ...

    I don't think you have to be a Mensa to be a good QB ... sometimes those that are smarter can get into ruts where they overthink things (something I am guilty of from time to time). Sometimes ignorance can be bliss where you just go and aren't slowed down by excess thought.

    It'll obviously never be proven one way or another but I can envision where Locker would have been a very good QB at UW and very good NFL QB. Talent by itself doesn't get you everywhere. Locker had it. But a lot of other things for one reason or another were not where they needed to be.
    Football was a lot different in the 1970s than in the 2000s.

    Also, water is wet.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:


    I'll never get the Locker hate, but for Christ's sake, if you've been paying any attention at all to the last three years then you know the whole fucking team would have been much better.

    It's why I don't understand the Locker hate and why this is even really a question ...

    Locker had all the tools necessary to be a good QB ...

    He never really was in a great position from a development, coaching, or team position to grow into a truly elite level player.

    I don't blame him one bit for walking away from the NFL ... if you aren't 100% in ... then you should be 100% out.
    He had all the tools except he was not smart and he was not accurate. Both can be improved with coaching, but on some level he was lacking naturally in both those areas.
    Listening to players from the 70s they'd tell you that Terry Bradshaw was beyond stupid ...

    I don't think you have to be a Mensa to be a good QB ... sometimes those that are smarter can get into ruts where they overthink things (something I am guilty of from time to time). Sometimes ignorance can be bliss where you just go and aren't slowed down by excess thought.

    It'll obviously never be proven one way or another but I can envision where Locker would have been a very good QB at UW and very good NFL QB. Talent by itself doesn't get you everywhere. Locker had it. But a lot of other things for one reason or another were not where they needed to be.
    Just get out there and #ripit?
    Bradshaw had good instincts .. to go along with a team full of hall of fame players on both sides of the ball and hall of fame coaching on the sidelines. #STEELCURTAIN