trumpcare is back
Comments
-
I
You know what's better than a single charity? Having the entire society pay for each other's illnesses. Like schools, roads, water, santitation, military, etc.RaceBannon said:
Who said that?Intersectional_Dawg said:
About as good as telling diabetics and cancer sufferers to go fuck themselves.RaceBannon said:
That's a really well thought out counter argumentIntersectional_Dawg said:
You gotta be fucking kidding me. But then again, nothing about the conservative line surprises me anymore.RaceBannon said:Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything
This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.
This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.
People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.
We tried it the Obama way and it failed. -
This won't be the solution to the Obama way, hth.RaceBannon said:Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything
This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.
This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.
People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.
We tried it the Obama way and it failed. -
I think we should cover preexisting conditions and just kill everyone over 65 to save the money to do it. Or kill them and seize all their assets - whichever.
When I'm 64, we should look for a different solution. -
You mean how I said taxpayers can cover the rest?Intersectional_Dawg said:I
You know what's better than a single charity? Having the entire society pay for each other's illnesses. Like schools, roads, water, santitation, military, etc.RaceBannon said:
Who said that?Intersectional_Dawg said:
About as good as telling diabetics and cancer sufferers to go fuck themselves.RaceBannon said:
That's a really well thought out counter argumentIntersectional_Dawg said:
You gotta be fucking kidding me. But then again, nothing about the conservative line surprises me anymore.RaceBannon said:Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything
This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.
This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.
People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.
We tried it the Obama way and it failed.
You don't need to fuck up everyone's insurance to get the indigent health care.
Like I said Obama tried that and it's fucking stupid -
Framing this as indigent vs everyone else is both factually as well as ethically wrong. This country's in trouble if your line becomes dominant.RaceBannon said:
You mean how I said taxpayers can cover the rest?Intersectional_Dawg said:I
You know what's better than a single charity? Having the entire society pay for each other's illnesses. Like schools, roads, water, santitation, military, etc.RaceBannon said:
Who said that?Intersectional_Dawg said:
About as good as telling diabetics and cancer sufferers to go fuck themselves.RaceBannon said:
That's a really well thought out counter argumentIntersectional_Dawg said:
You gotta be fucking kidding me. But then again, nothing about the conservative line surprises me anymore.RaceBannon said:Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything
This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.
This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.
People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.
We tried it the Obama way and it failed.
You don't need to fuck up everyone's insurance to get the indigent health care.
Like I said Obama tried that and it's fucking stupid -
You can get Urgent Care at Walgreens these days. FaceTime Doctors at Rite Aid. Access to healthcare for 97% of ailments is modernizing and almost instantaneous.
Days are ending when you can eat 10 pounds of Cheeze whiz Nachos and a gallon of soda pop every day, smoke a pack of camels with a fifth of vodka and demand State of the art care. -
It is completely factual. And it's ethical.Intersectional_Dawg said:
Framing this as indigent vs everyone else is both factually as well as ethically wrong. This country's in trouble if your line becomes dominant.RaceBannon said:
You mean how I said taxpayers can cover the rest?Intersectional_Dawg said:I
You know what's better than a single charity? Having the entire society pay for each other's illnesses. Like schools, roads, water, santitation, military, etc.RaceBannon said:
Who said that?Intersectional_Dawg said:
About as good as telling diabetics and cancer sufferers to go fuck themselves.RaceBannon said:
That's a really well thought out counter argumentIntersectional_Dawg said:
You gotta be fucking kidding me. But then again, nothing about the conservative line surprises me anymore.RaceBannon said:Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything
This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.
This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.
People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.
We tried it the Obama way and it failed.
You don't need to fuck up everyone's insurance to get the indigent health care.
Like I said Obama tried that and it's fucking stupid
Obamacare was sold on how many freeloaders signed up. At great expense to those who lost their doctor and insurance
You couldn't find a more fucking stupid way to do it.
-
I thought we were moving on to tax reform.
-
We've moved on from ocare. Keep up.RaceBannon said:
It is completely factual. And it's ethical.Intersectional_Dawg said:
Framing this as indigent vs everyone else is both factually as well as ethically wrong. This country's in trouble if your line becomes dominant.RaceBannon said:
You mean how I said taxpayers can cover the rest?Intersectional_Dawg said:I
You know what's better than a single charity? Having the entire society pay for each other's illnesses. Like schools, roads, water, santitation, military, etc.RaceBannon said:
Who said that?Intersectional_Dawg said:
About as good as telling diabetics and cancer sufferers to go fuck themselves.RaceBannon said:
That's a really well thought out counter argumentIntersectional_Dawg said:
You gotta be fucking kidding me. But then again, nothing about the conservative line surprises me anymore.RaceBannon said:Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything
This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.
This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.
People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.
We tried it the Obama way and it failed.
You don't need to fuck up everyone's insurance to get the indigent health care.
Like I said Obama tried that and it's fucking stupid
Obamacare was sold on how many freeloaders signed up. At great expense to those who lost their doctor and insurance
You couldn't find a more fucking stupid way to do it. -
You're such a fucking turd. obk brings more to the table.doogie said:You can get Urgent Care at Walgreens these days. FaceTime Doctors at Rite Aid. Access to healthcare for 97% of ailments is modernizing and almost instantaneous.
Days are ending when you can eat 10 pounds of Cheeze whiz Nachos and a gallon of soda pop every day, smoke a pack of camels with a fifth of vodka and demand State of the art care.
