Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Manuel Allen, 2018 WR, Corona (Centennial), CA (OFFERED)

FKA_MousecopFKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054
Decommitted from USC, How do you think this will play into Spiker, Chase Williams etc.?
«134

Comments

  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    R u sure his offer was not pulled? Caz USC is in the running for all the 5* WR
  • FKA_MousecopFKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054

    R u sure his offer was not pulled? Caz USC is in the running for all the 5* WR

    They've always been in the running for Amon-Ra, Jalen Hall, etc. , so if that was the case, why would they even accept his commitment last month?
  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792
    Reliable guy on the USC 247 boards (who knew every silent commit before they went public for the 2017 class) says that Jalen Hall (duh) and Amon-Ra St. Brown are silent commits, and they are looking into maybe one more big fish for WR.
  • whuggywhuggy Member Posts: 2,088
    NEsnake12 said:

    Reliable guy on the USC 247 boards (who knew every silent commit before they went public for the 2017 class) says that Jalen Hall (duh) and Amon-Ra St. Brown are silent commits, and they are looking into maybe one more big fish for WR.

    Their class is gonna be ridiculous.
  • FKA_MousecopFKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054

    whuggy said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    Reliable guy on the USC 247 boards (who knew every silent commit before they went public for the 2017 class) says that Jalen Hall (duh) and Amon-Ra St. Brown are silent commits, and they are looking into maybe one more big fish for WR.

    Their class is gonna be ridiculous.
    Maybe you guys haven't been paying attention, but what they did last year... They literally do it every year.

    It's just that we're starting to compete more for the same guys.

    Manny Allen isn't that great.
    I agree with this. They were basically guaranteed to get at least two WRs better than him, so it's just interesting why they even accepted is commitment.
  • NurpleNurple Member Posts: 686
    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,882
    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
  • NurpleNurple Member Posts: 686
    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,882
    Nurple said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
    What's your standards?

    Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:

    1920s: 1
    1930s: 1
    1940s: 0
    1950s: 1
    1960s: 2
    1970s: 1
    1980s: 2
    1990s: 4
    2000s: 1
    2010s: 1
    Total: 14

    Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.

    That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:

    USC: 40
    UCLA: 19
  • priapismpriapism Member Posts: 2,127
    Manuel Allen is too slight and lanky, he's going to eventually get injured...he looks maybe about 165-170#s.
    I'd much rather have Petersen get Chase Williams - he could potentially be a punt returner/kick returner. Spiker, Williams, and Osbourne are good enough for 2018.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,745
    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
    What's your standards?

    Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:

    1920s: 1
    1930s: 1
    1940s: 0
    1950s: 1
    1960s: 2
    1970s: 1
    1980s: 2
    1990s: 4
    2000s: 1
    2010s: 1
    Total: 14

    Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.

    That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:

    USC: 40
    UCLA: 19
    Why would you count division titles?
  • FKA_MousecopFKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054
    priapism said:

    Manuel Allen is too slight and lanky, he's going to eventually get injured...he looks maybe about 165-170#s.
    I'd much rather have Petersen get Chase Williams - he could potentially be a punt returner/kick returner. Spiker, Williams, and Osbourne are good enough for 2018.

    I agree. He's definitely overrated by the sites. If I had to guess I'd say we end up with Osborne, Spiker, Culp (TE), and maybe Treshaun in the slot if not at RB. Chase Williams goes out east, and Allen ends up at Nebraska or some shit.

    I'd still definitely take Williams though, it might depend on if there's any additional attrition among the WR corps.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,539 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
    What's your standards?

    Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:

    1920s: 1
    1930s: 1
    1940s: 0
    1950s: 1
    1960s: 2
    1970s: 1
    1980s: 2
    1990s: 4
    2000s: 1
    2010s: 1
    Total: 14

    Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.

    That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:

    USC: 40
    UCLA: 19
    don't forget 1916
Sign In or Register to comment.