Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Manuel Allen, 2018 WR, Corona (Centennial), CA (OFFERED)

13

Comments

  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Manny Allen sucks

    but he is a 4 star recruit
  • priapismpriapism Member Posts: 2,127
    UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...
  • pat_hmpat_hm Member Posts: 941
    Harrison at safety needs to happen.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    priapism said:

    UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...

    Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.

    Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited April 2017
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    For that skinny body kid got big dome

    Looks like a meatball on a toothpick.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,745
    He'll be coming with Coach Sirmon to UW next year if by some chance we want him.










    We don't.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Is he still rated higher than Osborne on scout? What a shit show.
  • FKA_MousecopFKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054
    I wonder if Coach Pete still likes this kid's stars.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,497 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
    What's your standards?

    Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:

    1920s: 1
    1930s: 1
    1940s: 0
    1950s: 1
    1960s: 2
    1970s: 1
    1980s: 2
    1990s: 4
    2000s: 1
    2010s: 1
    Total: 14

    Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.

    That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:

    USC: 40
    UCLA: 19
    Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.
  • theknowledgetheknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,928 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
    What's your standards?

    Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:

    1920s: 1
    1930s: 1
    1940s: 0
    1950s: 1
    1960s: 2
    1970s: 1
    1980s: 2
    1990s: 4
    2000s: 1
    2010s: 1
    Total: 14

    Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.

    That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:

    USC: 40
    UCLA: 19
    Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.
    Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,745

    Swaye said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
    What's your standards?

    Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:

    1920s: 1
    1930s: 1
    1940s: 0
    1950s: 1
    1960s: 2
    1970s: 1
    1980s: 2
    1990s: 4
    2000s: 1
    2010s: 1
    Total: 14

    Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.

    That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:

    USC: 40
    UCLA: 19
    Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.
    Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.
    Coogs didn't ruin 84, I thought SC did
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    edited August 2017

    priapism said:

    UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...

    Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.

    Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will.
    I know the situation right now seems odd, but to what do you owe your optimism?
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,745
    Gladstone said:

    priapism said:

    UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...

    Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.

    Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will.
    I know the situation right seems odd, but to what do you owe your optimism?
    That poast was in April. Ups and downs, etc
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    Swaye said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    Tequilla said:

    Nurple said:

    We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.

    You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.
    You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.
    What's your standards?

    Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:

    1920s: 1
    1930s: 1
    1940s: 0
    1950s: 1
    1960s: 2
    1970s: 1
    1980s: 2
    1990s: 4
    2000s: 1
    2010s: 1
    Total: 14

    Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.

    That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:

    USC: 40
    UCLA: 19
    Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.
    Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.
    Coogs didn't ruin 84, I thought SC did
    Coogs got us in 81 and 82
Sign In or Register to comment.