Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Manuel Allen, 2018 WR, Corona (Centennial), CA (OFFERED)
Comments
-
Jalen Hall is overrated, and you forgot Amon-Ra.dnc said:
So, synthesizing a few things you've* said I have your west coast WR bored looking like this:Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we thought we were dialed in on Ozzy and Spiker, so we dropped back a bit. We would've never beat USC for him.Ice_Holmvik said:This kid was all UW before committing to SC. Maybe our staff wasnt very high on him?
I bet USC told him to look around.
He's good... but he's not AMAZING.
1. Jalen Hall (going to USC)
2/3. Osbourne/Spiker (not sure how you have them ordered)
4. Michael Wilson
5. Chase Williams
Is Allen number six, or are there others who slot above him?
*Some of that may have come from Coker, but I always just assume you two share a TBS brain.
I think DDY and Coker both said that they think Osborne/Spiker are the top 2 on the West coast this year. -
I didn't forget Amon-Ra, DDY said he loves his name but not his game.NEsnake12 said:
Jalen Hall is overrated, and you forgot Amon-Ra.dnc said:
So, synthesizing a few things you've* said I have your west coast WR bored looking like this:Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we thought we were dialed in on Ozzy and Spiker, so we dropped back a bit. We would've never beat USC for him.Ice_Holmvik said:This kid was all UW before committing to SC. Maybe our staff wasnt very high on him?
I bet USC told him to look around.
He's good... but he's not AMAZING.
1. Jalen Hall (going to USC)
2/3. Osbourne/Spiker (not sure how you have them ordered)
4. Michael Wilson
5. Chase Williams
Is Allen number six, or are there others who slot above him?
*Some of that may have come from Coker, but I always just assume you two share a TBS brain.
I think DDY and Coker both said that they think Osborne/Spiker are the top 2 on the West coast this year. -
I would do it more in tiers:dnc said:
So, synthesizing a few things you've* said I have your west coast WR bored looking like this:Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we thought we were dialed in on Ozzy and Spiker, so we dropped back a bit. We would've never beat USC for him.Ice_Holmvik said:This kid was all UW before committing to SC. Maybe our staff wasnt very high on him?
I bet USC told him to look around.
He's good... but he's not AMAZING.
1. Jalen Hall (going to USC)
2/3. Osbourne/Spiker (not sure how you have them ordered)
4. Michael Wilson
5. Chase Williams
Is Allen number six, or are there others who slot above him?
*Some of that may have come from Coker, but I always just assume you two share a TBS brain.
Tier 1
Osborne, Spiker, Hall, Devon Williams from Antelope Valley if he plays WR (kid is unreal)
Tier 2:
Wilson, Williams, St. Brown, Chase Cota
Tier 3:
Others -
I know you've said Spiker = @BornSinner, so he's obviously Tier 1 comparable. If they were this year's recruits would Cook and Bynum be tier 2?Dennis_DeYoung said:
I would do it more in tiers:dnc said:
So, synthesizing a few things you've* said I have your west coast WR bored looking like this:Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we thought we were dialed in on Ozzy and Spiker, so we dropped back a bit. We would've never beat USC for him.Ice_Holmvik said:This kid was all UW before committing to SC. Maybe our staff wasnt very high on him?
I bet USC told him to look around.
He's good... but he's not AMAZING.
1. Jalen Hall (going to USC)
2/3. Osbourne/Spiker (not sure how you have them ordered)
4. Michael Wilson
5. Chase Williams
Is Allen number six, or are there others who slot above him?
*Some of that may have come from Coker, but I always just assume you two share a TBS brain.
Tier 1
Osborne, Spiker, Hall, Devon Williams from Antelope Valley if he plays WR (kid is unreal)
Tier 2:
Wilson, Williams, St. Brown, Chase Cota
Tier 3:
Others -
Yeah, exactly. Tier 1 means like dudes that are SUPER BALLERS. Tier 2 is guys I really, really like, but obviously not in the tip top group.dnc said:
I know you've said Spiker = @BornSinner, so he's obviously Tier 1 comparable. If they were this year's recruits would Cook and Bynum be tier 2?Dennis_DeYoung said:
I would do it more in tiers:dnc said:
So, synthesizing a few things you've* said I have your west coast WR bored looking like this:Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we thought we were dialed in on Ozzy and Spiker, so we dropped back a bit. We would've never beat USC for him.Ice_Holmvik said:This kid was all UW before committing to SC. Maybe our staff wasnt very high on him?
I bet USC told him to look around.
He's good... but he's not AMAZING.
1. Jalen Hall (going to USC)
2/3. Osbourne/Spiker (not sure how you have them ordered)
4. Michael Wilson
5. Chase Williams
Is Allen number six, or are there others who slot above him?
*Some of that may have come from Coker, but I always just assume you two share a TBS brain.
Tier 1
Osborne, Spiker, Hall, Devon Williams from Antelope Valley if he plays WR (kid is unreal)
Tier 2:
Wilson, Williams, St. Brown, Chase Cota
Tier 3:
Others -
I want Amon-Ra to come here solely to hear this song in Husky Stadium.dnc said:
I didn't forget Amon-Ra, DDY said he loves his name but not his game.NEsnake12 said:
Jalen Hall is overrated, and you forgot Amon-Ra.dnc said:
So, synthesizing a few things you've* said I have your west coast WR bored looking like this:Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we thought we were dialed in on Ozzy and Spiker, so we dropped back a bit. We would've never beat USC for him.Ice_Holmvik said:This kid was all UW before committing to SC. Maybe our staff wasnt very high on him?
I bet USC told him to look around.
He's good... but he's not AMAZING.
1. Jalen Hall (going to USC)
2/3. Osbourne/Spiker (not sure how you have them ordered)
4. Michael Wilson
5. Chase Williams
Is Allen number six, or are there others who slot above him?
*Some of that may have come from Coker, but I always just assume you two share a TBS brain.
I think DDY and Coker both said that they think Osborne/Spiker are the top 2 on the West coast this year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqzF6hXACho -
So, he's committed for the second time... this time to Neb and their drunk-driving, hard-crootin' WR coach Keith Williams (who is responsible for the hashtag #CaliBraska).
-
calibraska? lol
-
-
Keyshawn junior is at Nebraska
-
Manny Allen sucks
-
but he is a 4 star recruitCokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Manny Allen sucks
-
UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...
-
Harrison at safety needs to happen.
-
Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.priapism said:UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...
Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will. -
For that skinny body kid got big dome
-
Looks like a meatball on a toothpick.WeakarmCobra said:For that skinny body kid got big dome
-
-
hahahaha
-
He'll be coming with Coach Sirmon to UW next year if by some chance we want him.
We don't. -
Is he still rated higher than Osborne on scout? What a shit show.
-
I'm a fan of using birdgang as often as possible, so I'm ok with this.
-
-
I wonder if Coach Pete still likes this kid's stars.
-
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19 -
Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.Swaye said:
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19 -
Coogs didn't ruin 84, I thought SC didtheknowledge said:
Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.Swaye said:
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19 -
I know the situation right now seems odd, but to what do you owe your optimism?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.priapism said:UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...
Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will. -
That poast was in April. Ups and downs, etcGladstone said:
I know the situation right seems odd, but to what do you owe your optimism?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.priapism said:UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...
Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will. -
Coogs got us in 81 and 82dnc said:
Coogs didn't ruin 84, I thought SC didtheknowledge said:
Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.Swaye said:
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19
https://youtu.be/pLvzvEsjv80
