You look at things like the coverage of Kaepernick versus Curt Schilling. One is courageous and one is a douchebag as presented.
People here may have different views on which is which. You won't find much diversity of thought on that amongst journalists.
Dan LeBatard who tends to bat from the left side of the plate is a notable exception. He called out one of his guys who said someone was courageous for bashing Trump and said the courage today would be in supporting Trump.
You look at things like the coverage of Kaepernick versus Curt Schilling. One is courageous and one is a douchebag as presented.
People here may have different views on which is which. You won't find much diversity of thought on that amongst journalists.
Dan LeBatard who tends to bat from the left side of the plate is a notable exception. He called out one of his guys who said someone was courageous for bashing Trump and said the courage today would be in supporting Trump.
#Courage
Isn't LeBatard a radio talk show host? Is that considered a journalist? Rush/Softy are journalists?
You look at things like the coverage of Kaepernick versus Curt Schilling. One is courageous and one is a douchebag as presented.
People here may have different views on which is which. You won't find much diversity of thought on that amongst journalists.
Dan LeBatard who tends to bat from the left side of the plate is a notable exception. He called out one of his guys who said someone was courageous for bashing Trump and said the courage today would be in supporting Trump.
#Courage
Isn't LeBatard a radio talk show host? Is that considered a journalist? Rush/Softy are journalists?
You look at things like the coverage of Kaepernick versus Curt Schilling. One is courageous and one is a douchebag as presented.
People here may have different views on which is which. You won't find much diversity of thought on that amongst journalists.
Dan LeBatard who tends to bat from the left side of the plate is a notable exception. He called out one of his guys who said someone was courageous for bashing Trump and said the courage today would be in supporting Trump.
#Courage
Isn't LeBatard a radio talk show host? Is that considered a journalist? Rush/Softy are journalists?
You look at things like the coverage of Kaepernick versus Curt Schilling. One is courageous and one is a douchebag as presented.
People here may have different views on which is which. You won't find much diversity of thought on that amongst journalists.
Dan LeBatard who tends to bat from the left side of the plate is a notable exception. He called out one of his guys who said someone was courageous for bashing Trump and said the courage today would be in supporting Trump.
#Courage
Isn't LeBatard a radio talk show host? Is that considered a journalist? Rush/Softy are journalists?
Why?
Answer the fucking questions?!
Why?
I mixed it up a bit but in my defense, sports talk and ESPN is where the social justice athlete is discussed the most
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
OK, local TV news. 80% or whatever of the square area of the country is Republican, right? Do you think local news people are Democrat in Nebraska? Same with local newspapers if you want to go there. How many were dug up that hadn't supported a Democrat in more than 40 plus years? One went back to the 1800s or some shit.
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
OK, local TV news. 80% or whatever of the square area of the country is Republican, right? Do you think local news people are Democrat in Nebraska? Same with local newspapers if you want to go there. How many were dug up that hadn't supported a Democrat in more than 40 plus years? One went back to the 1800s or some shit.
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
Maybe you're right but I doubt it. I live in Memphissippi and the local TV and radio are both completely liberal.
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
OK, local TV news. 80% or whatever of the square area of the country is Republican, right? Do you think local news people are Democrat in Nebraska? Same with local newspapers if you want to go there. How many were dug up that hadn't supported a Democrat in more than 40 plus years? One went back to the 1800s or some shit.
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
Now you're conflating all sorts of shit.
J-schools produce graduates who are flung out to the hinterlands to find jobs. These are not 5th generation farmers tied to hearth & home. Locality is not important.
Endorsements are made by an editorial board, a relatively small part of a total newsroom, and often including management/ownership.
Your common sense may say affiliation is similar to country at large. The survey says it does not match.
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
OK, local TV news. 80% or whatever of the square area of the country is Republican, right? Do you think local news people are Democrat in Nebraska? Same with local newspapers if you want to go there. How many were dug up that hadn't supported a Democrat in more than 40 plus years? One went back to the 1800s or some shit.
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
Now you're conflating all sorts of shit.
J-schools produce graduates who are flung out to the hinterlands to find jobs. These are not 5th generation farmers tied to hearth & home. Locality is not important.
Endorsements are made by an editorial board, a relatively small part of a total newsroom, and often including management/ownership.
Your common sense may say affiliation is similar to country at large. The survey says it does not match.
The media speaks to their audience. Just like when I was in Charlotte last fall, the Sunday morning CBS channel before football was a Catholic sermon. You'd never see that in a liberal town.
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
OK, local TV news. 80% or whatever of the square area of the country is Republican, right? Do you think local news people are Democrat in Nebraska? Same with local newspapers if you want to go there. How many were dug up that hadn't supported a Democrat in more than 40 plus years? One went back to the 1800s or some shit.
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
Now you're conflating all sorts of shit.
J-schools produce graduates who are flung out to the hinterlands to find jobs. These are not 5th generation farmers tied to hearth & home. Locality is not important.
Endorsements are made by an editorial board, a relatively small part of a total newsroom, and often including management/ownership.
Your common sense may say affiliation is similar to country at large. The survey says it does not match.
The media speaks to their audience. Just like when I was in Charlotte last fall, the Sunday morning CBS channel before football was a Catholic sermon. You'd never see that in a liberal town.
More conflation. The sermon was media programming, zero to do with journalism. The survey was regarding journalists.
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
OK, local TV news. 80% or whatever of the square area of the country is Republican, right? Do you think local news people are Democrat in Nebraska? Same with local newspapers if you want to go there. How many were dug up that hadn't supported a Democrat in more than 40 plus years? One went back to the 1800s or some shit.
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
Now you're conflating all sorts of shit.
J-schools produce graduates who are flung out to the hinterlands to find jobs. These are not 5th generation farmers tied to hearth & home. Locality is not important.
Endorsements are made by an editorial board, a relatively small part of a total newsroom, and often including management/ownership.
Your common sense may say affiliation is similar to country at large. The survey says it does not match.
The media speaks to their audience. Just like when I was in Charlotte last fall, the Sunday morning CBS channel before football was a Catholic sermon. You'd never see that in a liberal town.
More conflation. The sermon was media programming, zero to do with journalism. The survey was regarding journalists.
Do you think the news channels speak to their audience for regular programming. But not for their news segments?
Yes and I'm saying that surveying journalists is dumb. There's so much more media out there were people get their news from.
Why do you hate TV and radio media? Does anyone read a newspaper anymore?
Produce the numbers that show it's any different. I'd be surprised if TV is much different, it's sure as hell not for the TV I watch. Radio you probably have a point.
OK, local TV news. 80% or whatever of the square area of the country is Republican, right? Do you think local news people are Democrat in Nebraska? Same with local newspapers if you want to go there. How many were dug up that hadn't supported a Democrat in more than 40 plus years? One went back to the 1800s or some shit.
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
Now you're conflating all sorts of shit.
J-schools produce graduates who are flung out to the hinterlands to find jobs. These are not 5th generation farmers tied to hearth & home. Locality is not important.
Endorsements are made by an editorial board, a relatively small part of a total newsroom, and often including management/ownership.
Your common sense may say affiliation is similar to country at large. The survey says it does not match.
The media speaks to their audience. Just like when I was in Charlotte last fall, the Sunday morning CBS channel before football was a Catholic sermon. You'd never see that in a liberal town.
Comments
People here may have different views on which is which. You won't find much diversity of thought on that amongst journalists.
Dan LeBatard who tends to bat from the left side of the plate is a notable exception. He called out one of his guys who said someone was courageous for bashing Trump and said the courage today would be in supporting Trump.
#Courage
I mixed it up a bit but in my defense, sports talk and ESPN is where the social justice athlete is discussed the most
Just common sense says the media is probably pretty similar to the rest of the country. And I laff that 50.2% say they are independent. That's BS too, most people have a bias one way or the other. That's a product of people wanting the perception they are independent now days.
thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/16/as-trump-raves-his-republican-enablers-face-a-moment-of-truth.html
FS
I'd be interested in seeing some data.
J-schools produce graduates who are flung out to the hinterlands to find jobs. These are not 5th generation farmers tied to hearth & home. Locality is not important.
Endorsements are made by an editorial board, a relatively small part of a total newsroom, and often including management/ownership.
Your common sense may say affiliation is similar to country at large. The survey says it does not match.
Yes and I'm saying that surveying journalists is dumb. There's so much more media out there were people get their news from.