Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to Coker and DDY

13567

Comments

  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    Passion said:

    Michael Wilson is my number 3 of WR, then Chase Williams is next (this does not include Jalen Hall because he's going to USC). Wilson and Williams are both just a notch below Spiker and Osborne to me, but both are still very good.

    I'd only take one of them in addition to Spiker and Osborne if we only take 1 TE. I like Williams better at WR than I do safety, so I don't see that happening.

    And yes, if Spiker doesn't commit I see us going after Wilson and Williams and seeing who commits first.

    All this energy lately discussing WRs. Fuck me.
    Sorry we forgot you like heat from the edge and push down th middle
    I just like to win. Love Osbourne, but WRs ain't that important.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    Michael Wilson is my number 3 of WR, then Chase Williams is next (this does not include Jalen Hall because he's going to USC). Wilson and Williams are both just a notch below Spiker and Osborne to me, but both are still very good.

    I'd only take one of them in addition to Spiker and Osborne if we only take 1 TE. I like Williams better at WR than I do safety, so I don't see that happening.

    And yes, if Spiker doesn't commit I see us going after Wilson and Williams and seeing who commits first.

    All this energy lately discussing WRs. Fuck me.
    Sorry we forgot you like heat from the edge and push down th middle
    I just like to win. Love Osbourne, but WRs ain't that important.
    I think we just happy that we are actually getting good talent at WR, but we all know that this game is won in the trenches.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    Michael Wilson is my number 3 of WR, then Chase Williams is next (this does not include Jalen Hall because he's going to USC). Wilson and Williams are both just a notch below Spiker and Osborne to me, but both are still very good.

    I'd only take one of them in addition to Spiker and Osborne if we only take 1 TE. I like Williams better at WR than I do safety, so I don't see that happening.

    And yes, if Spiker doesn't commit I see us going after Wilson and Williams and seeing who commits first.

    All this energy lately discussing WRs. Fuck me.
    Sorry we forgot you like heat from the edge and push down th middle
    I just like to win. Love Osbourne, but WRs ain't that important.
    I think we just happy that we are actually getting good talent at WR, but we all know that this game is won in the trenches.
    Fair enough. Cue the "Doog It Up" video.
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    Michael Wilson is my number 3 of WR, then Chase Williams is next (this does not include Jalen Hall because he's going to USC). Wilson and Williams are both just a notch below Spiker and Osborne to me, but both are still very good.

    I'd only take one of them in addition to Spiker and Osborne if we only take 1 TE. I like Williams better at WR than I do safety, so I don't see that happening.

    And yes, if Spiker doesn't commit I see us going after Wilson and Williams and seeing who commits first.

    All this energy lately discussing WRs. Fuck me.
    Sorry we forgot you like heat from the edge and push down th middle
    I just like to win. Love Osbourne, but WRs ain't that important.
    Conference titles are won in the trenches, natties are won at every single position.
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245

    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    Michael Wilson is my number 3 of WR, then Chase Williams is next (this does not include Jalen Hall because he's going to USC). Wilson and Williams are both just a notch below Spiker and Osborne to me, but both are still very good.

    I'd only take one of them in addition to Spiker and Osborne if we only take 1 TE. I like Williams better at WR than I do safety, so I don't see that happening.

    And yes, if Spiker doesn't commit I see us going after Wilson and Williams and seeing who commits first.

    All this energy lately discussing WRs. Fuck me.
    Sorry we forgot you like heat from the edge and push down th middle
    I just like to win. Love Osbourne, but WRs ain't that important.
    I think we just happy that we are actually getting good talent at WR, but we all know that this game is won in the trenches.
    yah, cue all the strausser hate comments.


    losing battle of the trenches > qb is pressured or killed > elite wr's can't get the ball > elite running game is stuffed (unless you're bo jackson or jim brown against a HS team).

    the whole goddamn offense cannot function to it's potential ...
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    WRs are the second least important position... If I could have a good player at any position it would go like:

    1. QB
    2. DL
    3. OL
    4. RB
    5. DB
    6. LB
    7. WR
    8. TE
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club

    WRs are the second least important position... If I could have a good player at any position it would go like:

    1. QB
    2. DL
    3. OL
    4. RB
    5. DB
    6. LB
    7. WR
    8. TE

    This man knows shit.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club

    WRs are the second least important position... If I could have a good player at any position it would go like:

    1. QB
    2. DL
    3. OL
    4. RB
    5. DB
    6. LB
    7. WR
    8. TE

    Also, good to know we have lousy fuckass recruiters at two of the top 3 positions, and a question mark at the other. But we got 5 and 7 covered! FML.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited February 2017

    WRs are the second least important position... If I could have a good player at any position it would go like:

    1a. QB
    1b. DL

    2. OL
    4. RB
    5. DB
    6. LB
    7. WR
    8. TE

    Why? Because there have been plenty of average-to-good QBs that have won Super Bowls, big games, etc (Brad Johnson, Trent Dilfer, Phil Simms to name a few). A great defense can win if the QB simply throws the ball out of bounds when nothing is there, rather that shit his pants and throw costly pics. John Elway never won a Super Bowl until the broncos got a defense and a good running game with Terrell Davis.

    Give me an outstanding front four, a good running game and a QB that simply doesn't fuck up.