October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to report abuse Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.
LRR
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since.
Are there any Armenian NFL stars that will write a letter to President Young compelling Sark to be extended? Is there a Seattle chapter of the NAAAP that will intervene on Corky's behalf?
The Kardashian family will be outraged that Armenian's aren't getting a fair shake in this country!
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to report abuse Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.
LRR
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since.
The TUFF schedule argument ends when UW and WSU join their brothers in the Big Sky.
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to report abuse Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.
LRR
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since.
The TUFF schedule argument ends when UW and WSU join their brothers in the Big Sky.
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to report abuse Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.
LRR
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since.
The TUFF schedule argument ends when UW and WSU join their brothers in the Big Sky.
Go Bobcats!
Our Bobcats and Vikings would give those classless motherfuckers some beatdowns.
Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.
Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.
After a 4th straight 7-6 season then Sark will be on the "hot seat" and be given "one last chance" to prove himself next year.
Going into a season on the hot seat with no previous record of success is a recipe for disaster. I am not sure the athletic department has learned anything though.
this game is bigger than the Oregon game. Its the difference between 10-2 and 7-6. Unfair matchups though. This conference is unfair. Alabama and LSU would be 4-2 with UW's schedule. The difference? Banner and Miles would at least make as game @ASU. Sark better lose by no more than 3-7
Lol. There's one good team in this conference. But your AuburnDoog backtrack excuse making impression is top notch.
pac12 still 1-2 conference in country up top and in depth. Utah almost beat UcLA and did the Tree. I never backtrack bitch
this game is bigger than the Oregon game. Its the difference between 10-2 and 7-6. Unfair matchups though. This conference is unfair. Alabama and LSU would be 4-2 with UW's schedule. The difference? Banner and Miles would at least make as game @ASU. Sark better lose by no more than 3-7
Lol. There's one good team in this conference. But your AuburnDoog backtrack excuse making impression is top notch.
pac12 still 1-2 conference in country up top and in depth. Utah almost beat UcLA and did the Tree. I never backtrack bitch
The Pac-12 has only one good team maybe two with UCLA.
Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.
It very well may be wishful thinking, but I really do believe he will be fired if he goes 7-6. It seems crazy to think he would survive a fourth consecutive year of that especially when you watch this team and see 10 win talent.
Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.
It very well may be wishful thinking, but I really do believe he will be fired if he goes 7-6. It seems crazy to think he would survive a fourth consecutive year of that especially when you watch this team and see 10 win talent.
agreed
I think the boosters start to get really pissed. It's probably more of a 60 / 40 thing.
Are there any Armenian NFL stars that will write a letter to President Young compelling Sark to be extended? Is there a Seattle chapter of the NAAAP that will intervene on Corky's behalf?
Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.
It very well may be wishful thinking, but I really do believe he will be fired if he goes 7-6. It seems crazy to think he would survive a fourth consecutive year of that especially when you watch this team and see 10 win talent.
agreed
I think the boosters start to get really pissed. It's probably more of a 60 / 40 thing.
It will come down to butts in the seats. Lose at ASU and the Cal game is sparsely attended. Sark will start to be in trouble no matter what is said publicly. If there is still decent attendance and we go 7-6, it will not matter and it will be about the journey.
Even if he goes 7-6, Sark will be bailed out by the same excuse used to bail out his teams year after year: he's young.
We'd hate to be Sark's training ground for a new job and then have him go somewhere else and win a natty or five. So we'd better hang on to him and reap the benefits of our patience. 2018 will be special, for real this time.
Even if he goes 7-6, Sark will be bailed out by the same excuse used to bail out his teams year after year: he's young.
We'd hate to be Sark's training ground for a new job and then have him go somewhere else and win a natty or five. So we'd better hang on to him and reap the benefits of our patience. 2018 will be special, for real this time.
Yup you don't want to fire Rich Brooks too soon. We need the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl.
Comments
Having this job and seeing first hand the difference in the two programs he is more likely see our side of things.
I think deep down inside Condooga especially towards the end(why he bailed) knows we are right about Sark.
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since.
"The Huskies can save those illusions of grandeur for next season. "
Grandeur next season? Try next millennium.
Simple fact.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat.
I think the boosters start to get really pissed. It's probably more of a 60 / 40 thing.
We'd hate to be Sark's training ground for a new job and then have him go somewhere else and win a natty or five. So we'd better hang on to him and reap the benefits of our patience. 2018 will be special, for real this time.