Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

2017 Roster Update

1356

Comments

  • AEBAEB Member Posts: 2,971
    Kirkland is serviceable against everyone except SC and Bama. Burelson im still willing to LIPO. All said, a 270 true frosh beat them all out.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited January 2017
    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    Counting on JUCO's? Was your old handle JCKevin?
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    We cant sign three OL in a single year that we actually want how are we gonna get 5?

    And JUCO? Holy hell Miguel, who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? How many JUCO OL recruits in the entire country could even be options in any given year?
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Not giving up on devin burleson, rare human being. Same with Henry Roberts and Twattenberg when he isn't sick. Those are all 6'5+ guys that move well.

    And yeah, no reason to run Zeke Turner, his special teams contribution alone is worth it.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,586 Swaye's Wigwam
    Tequilla said:

    The problem w the OL recruiting is that it is the hardest to unbury yourself from

    The hardest part is that there just isn't the surplus of awesome prospects like there is at the skill positions.

    You actually have to beat other schools at it.
  • KobeStanKobeStan Member Posts: 91

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    We cant sign three OL in a single year that we actually want how are we gonna get 5?

    And JUCO? Holy hell Miguel, who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? How many JUCO OL recruits in the entire country could even be options in any given year?
    Every single year there are a handful of JUCO OL starting the Pac12, Alabama uses JUCO OL, Oklahoma does as well. The last 2 years there have been JUCO OL on the all conference 1st team(Bolles from Utah and Dahl from WSU)
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    Houhusky said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    We cant sign three OL in a single year that we actually want how are we gonna get 5?

    And JUCO? Holy hell Miguel, who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? How many JUCO OL recruits in the entire country could even be options in any given year?
    Every single year there are a handful of JUCO OL starting the Pac12, Alabama uses JUCO OL, Oklahoma does as well. The last 2 years there have been JUCO OL on the all conference 1st team(Bolles from Utah and Dahl from WSU)
    90% of the time JUCO players cant even qualify for UW because they take some fucktard PE programs at their community college and dont realize that UW wont recognize those credits.
    So you are saying that academis are important?
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,151
    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    We cant sign three OL in a single year that we actually want how are we gonna get 5?

    And JUCO? Holy hell Miguel, who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? How many JUCO OL recruits in the entire country could even be options in any given year?
    Every single year there are a handful of JUCO OL starting the Pac12, Alabama uses JUCO OL, Oklahoma does as well. The last 2 years there have been JUCO OL on the all conference 1st team(Bolles from Utah and Dahl from WSU)

    Who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? Corey Dillon?

    As @Houhusky said - UW doesn't admit many JC transfer/players. Year to year UW probably has the fewest in the league.

    I was surprised that Pete went after Rodriquez.

  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Might as well not even play the games next year since our OLine is going to be so bad.
  • digitsdigits Member Posts: 1,479
    We're? not gonna attempt to sign any JUCOs cuz Petersen knows it's a waste of time and energy, if he wants to build a program. If u don't understand that, I can't help you.
  • digitsdigits Member Posts: 1,479
    EwaDawg said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    We cant sign three OL in a single year that we actually want how are we gonna get 5?

    And JUCO? Holy hell Miguel, who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? How many JUCO OL recruits in the entire country could even be options in any given year?
    Every single year there are a handful of JUCO OL starting the Pac12, Alabama uses JUCO OL, Oklahoma does as well. The last 2 years there have been JUCO OL on the all conference 1st team(Bolles from Utah and Dahl from WSU)

    Who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? Corey Dillon?

    As @Houhusky said - UW doesn't admit many JC transfer/players. Year to year UW probably has the fewest in the league.

    I was surprised that Pete went after Rodriquez.

    Kai Ellis... but still.
  • iDawgiDawg Member Posts: 129
    Before I find some rope and a chair regarding the OL, you have to think either Drew or Will will make a move to this unit.

    Where have you gone Joe Toledo?

  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    haie said:

    Tequilla said:

    The problem w the OL recruiting is that it is the hardest to unbury yourself from

    The hardest part is that there just isn't the surplus of awesome prospects like there is at the skill positions.

    You actually have to beat other schools at it.
    Which is why you need a coach there that can recruit out of a wet paper bag
  • digitsdigits Member Posts: 1,479
    iDawg said:

    Before I find some rope and a chair regarding the OL, you have to think either Drew or Will will make a move to this unit.

    Where have you gone Joe Toledo?

    Who?
Sign In or Register to comment.