Foster Sarell to UW: Yes or No?
Comments
-
Wow.animate said:you dingleberries ... Sarell (and his family, specifically his mom) haven't even started/finished their OV at UW.
The only thing we can probably comfortably say (reading the tea leaves and doing some observation/psychology) is this:
- Sarell was mostly likely gone 4-5 months ago.
- his internet net presence was all Stanford
- recent UW success under Petersen and a rough patch with Stanford helped open his mind back to UW
- Stanford has recovered to a good season
- anything can happen (usually good things when a recruit and family get an OV to UW with Petersen)
for example: see Elijah Molden. He was pretty much Stanford until he got an OV with UW and that did it.
We can only hope the same thing happens with Sarell. But wherever he goes good luck to him.
Nebraska classy and on this bored.
Who the fuck would have known?
NOW LEAVE -
Yes or no, either way it will be interesting.
-
Wedington and fozzy to the tree. Cook it.
-
Close but no cigar.
The Foster's of the world grew up when UW football was average at best. Unless they bleed purple, or were going to UW since the day of conception it will take a few winning seasons to change their mind. This year and 2017 will start to pay recruiting dividends in 2018. -
2017 is a blockbuster class. Ahmed, Bryant, Jones and Marlon are every bit as talented as Sarrell. Ahmed for Heisman 2020.whuggy said:
Relationships with these kids are built over years.tvoie said:It sounds like UW doesn't get him, but I am just astounded that UW couldn't pull him in after the year UW has had with some of the home grown guys. I am not sure what else UW could have done, but it's a massive fail. Not signing these types of players is the difference between winning National Championships and conference championships in my opinion. It used to be because UW wasn't winning...now what?
Stanford has been successful for years now. UW
mostly just this year. Our bump will come in 2018
recruiting. Expect a blockbuster class that will greatly
ease the sting if FS goes to Stanford. -
I hope Stanford collapses in a giant earthquake.
http://www.stanforddaily.com/2013/10/11/all-shook-up-stanfords-earthquake-history/ -
-
What kind of fucked up parents name their kid Foster?
-
Foster parentsPurpleJ said:What kind of fucked up parents name their kid Foster?
-
He could go to the Foster School of Bidness!!!!1 ROFL!
-
Based mostly on lurking here and some TBS sites, 30, maybe 35% chance
-
Yes.
-
Still nothing on the visit from FS? He needs to put us out of our misery here.
-
On my commute home the doogman guys were on kjr and they were about to discuss Sarrell. I changed the channel.
-
Would have been more appropriate.Passion said:On my commute home the doogman guys were on kjr and they were about to discuss Sarrell. I
changedthe channeljerked the wheel and put my car into oncoming traffic. -
I read on some message board that some guy's neighbor knows the father of a kid that once played pee-wee league with him, and according that that guy, he is a Stanford lock.
-
Was going to make a "some guy played with his pee-wee" joke.. But I just couldn't bring myself down to that level.Baphomet said:I read on some message board that some guy's neighbor knows the father of a kid that once played pee-wee league with him, and according that that guy, he is a Stanford lock.
Too highbrow. -
Nebraska classyPurpleReign said:
Was going to make a "some guy played with his pee-wee" joke.. But I just couldn't bring myself down to that level.Baphomet said:I read on some message board that some guy's neighbor knows the father of a kid that once played pee-wee league with him, and according that that guy, he is a Stanford lock.
Too highbrow. -
-
We don't want him anyway
-
If he doesn't piss purple and shit gold, we don't want him
-
bananasnblondes said:
If he doesn't piss purple and shit cougar gold, we don't want him
-
-
Still no, because @doogie is a liar!!!!1!1!
-
If he's lying, he should be excommunicated from the site.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Still no, because @doogie is a liar!!!!1!1!
-
It's just what he's hearing. Some of you need to learn the differencetvoie said:
If he's lying, he should be excommunicated from the site.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Still no, because @doogie is a liar!!!!1!1!
-
His political posts alone are worthy of excommunicationtvoie said:
If he's lying, he should be excommunicated from the site.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Still no, because @doogie is a liar!!!!1!1!
-
Whatever happened with that?CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Still no, because @doogie is a liar!!!!1!1!
-
There's a good chance he could be sleeping with the fishes for what he told us here, it should have stayed in chat. There's lots of stuff he knows that he can't tell us.bananasnblondes said:
It's just what he's hearing. Some of you need to learn the differencetvoie said:
If he's lying, he should be excommunicated from the site.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Still no, because @doogie is a liar!!!!1!1!
That'll be $10.95 -
Freaking Kim told us not to talk about chat! It's like Fight Club...you just don't talk about it! I don't know why you guys never learn. It's actually really frustrating to see Kim put his sources on the line and to get paid back with people running their mouths on here.MelloDawg said:
There's a good chance he could be sleeping with the fishes for what he told us here, it should have stayed in chat. There's lots of stuff he knows that he can't tell us.bananasnblondes said:
It's just what he's hearing. Some of you need to learn the differencetvoie said:
If he's lying, he should be excommunicated from the site.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Still no, because @doogie is a liar!!!!1!1!
That'll be $10.95
