Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!









Show your support for what this community means to you:
Choose a Donation Amount
Username
(required for credit)
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

D.J. Johnson, 2017 7* BUCK, Miami (Da U), FL - transferring?

11415171920

Comments

  • I only want players that bleed purple and shit gold!
    RhythmicSlappingDawgEsophagealFecesYellowSnow
  • It's okay guys. Kim says apparently no other team in our conference signed an elite pass rusher this cycle either. It's okay to dominate this dreck conference and then get embarrassed on the national stage every year.
    RhythmicSlappingDawgBallzDeepEsophagealFecesguntlove
  • AZDuckAZDuck Posts: 15,263
    10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments 250 Answers
    This thread delivering.

    @TierbsHsotBoobs

    I like to denigrate (ISAFNRC) recroots who saw playing time as true frosh on the DL at Miami in 2017. I like to do that.
    GrundleStiltzkinRhythmicSlappingDawgguntlove
  • AZDuck said:

    This thread delivering.

    @TierbsHsotBoobs

    I like to denigrate (ISAFNRC) recroots who saw playing time as true frosh on the DL at Miami in 2017. I like to do that.

    He's been consistent with that take on DJ. Just like me & pumpy. Didn't want him.
    AZDuckRhythmicSlappingDawgTierbsHsotBoobsEsophagealFeces
  • rodmansragerodmansrage Posts: 3,227
    5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments Sixth Anniversary
    suppose im somewhat bummed about this.

    my fondest dj memory is probably that time during his recruiting period when he had that really weirdly photoshop of his head on a miami player's body on his twitter account.
    RhythmicSlappingDawg
  • AZDuckAZDuck Posts: 15,263
    10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments 250 Answers

    AZDuck said:

    This thread delivering.

    @TierbsHsotBoobs

    I like to denigrate (ISAFNRC) recroots who saw playing time as true frosh on the DL at Miami in 2017. I like to do that.

    true, he did start three games, and then was benched when another true freshman took his spot.

    he may be good, he may suck, either way, you should kill yourself.
    I should have killed myself a long tim ago. Should and would are different words
    TierbsHsotBoobsEsophagealFeces
  • MisterEmMisterEm Posts: 6,686
    5,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 5000 Comments Sixth Anniversary

    http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/16085/chris-warrens-top-4/p3

    I didn’t like Warren either. I also said Ngata would be a better than DJ Johnson. DJ Johnson has a long way to go. The only reason he would be worth celebrating is because we have nobody else to play Buck.

    Love your face Roadie, but this one will age as well as @JHopkinsFS Twitter feed.
    guntlove
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Posts: 23,168
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments
    edited January 2018
    Tequilla said:

    Unpopular opinion alert ...

    UW’s ability to win a National Title will require us to have a Top 10 National Defense that is generally sound and having an elite level QB that plays at an elite level

    For those of you think that 1991 is the only way to do it, that was less because we had elite players (outside of Emtman) but more because we had a defensive strategy that was largely new to college and teams weren’t largely ready to combat. In the 1992 Rose Bowl the D dominated Michigan. In 1993, Michigan put up 38 and Tyrone Wheatley ran all over us as teams started finding ways to exploit the defense.

    So unless we have plans on revolutionizing defensive football our best shot is to have an elite QB. And guess what you have a great chance of finding on the West Coast compared to the SEC ... it’s the ONLY competitive advantage we almost always will have on the field going forward.

    So you're saying the game evolves over time? Shocking!!

    I am starting to become a loser that worships the QB position.
    RhythmicSlappingDawgTequillaTierbsHsotBoobs
  • tvoietvoie Posts: 991
    1,000 Up Votes 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary 500 Awesomes
    Personally, I think pressure from the edge is overrrated. We don’t need it. UW will just work that much harder on defense and easily overcome it.
    FremontTrollGladstoneguntlove
  • PassionPassion Posts: 4,622
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes Sixth Anniversary 2500 Comments
    Tequilla said:

    Unpopular opinion alert ...

    UW’s ability to win a National Title will require us to have a Top 10 National Defense that is generally sound and having an elite level QB that plays at an elite level

    For those of you think that 1991 is the only way to do it, that was less because we had elite players (outside of Emtman) but more because we had a defensive strategy that was largely new to college and teams weren’t largely ready to combat. In the 1992 Rose Bowl the D dominated Michigan. In 1993, Michigan put up 38 and Tyrone Wheatley ran all over us as teams started finding ways to exploit the defense.

    So unless we have plans on revolutionizing defensive football our best shot is to have an elite QB. And guess what you have a great chance of finding on the West Coast compared to the SEC ... it’s the ONLY competitive advantage we almost always will have on the field going forward.

    So you're saying that Donald Jones and Andy Mason were not elite college pass rushers?

    The reason michigan had more offense in '93 is because we lost a lot of the "elite" players, including losing Donald Jones and replacing Emtman with Steve Hoffman.
    RhythmicSlappingDawgFremontTroll
  • TequillaTequilla Posts: 16,768
    10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Seventh Anniversary
    Passion said:

    Tequilla said:

    Unpopular opinion alert ...

    UW’s ability to win a National Title will require us to have a Top 10 National Defense that is generally sound and having an elite level QB that plays at an elite level

    For those of you think that 1991 is the only way to do it, that was less because we had elite players (outside of Emtman) but more because we had a defensive strategy that was largely new to college and teams weren’t largely ready to combat. In the 1992 Rose Bowl the D dominated Michigan. In 1993, Michigan put up 38 and Tyrone Wheatley ran all over us as teams started finding ways to exploit the defense.

    So unless we have plans on revolutionizing defensive football our best shot is to have an elite QB. And guess what you have a great chance of finding on the West Coast compared to the SEC ... it’s the ONLY competitive advantage we almost always will have on the field going forward.

    So you're saying that Donald Jones and Andy Mason were not elite college pass rushers?

    The reason michigan had more offense in '93 is because we lost a lot of the "elite" players, including losing Donald Jones and replacing Emtman with Steve Hoffman.
    Emtman was beyond elite ...

    Jones/Mason were great college players that were largely unique for its time period ... that was a defense where each player magnified the other

    The reality is that we are unlikely to ever have a roster stacked with elite can’t miss guys ... the key is to get as many as we can and outplay the handful of potential talented opponents we may run up against
    YellowSnow
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Posts: 26,740
    10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 25000 Comments Seventh Anniversary
    MisterEm said:

    http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/16085/chris-warrens-top-4/p3

    I didn’t like Warren either. I also said Ngata would be a better than DJ Johnson. DJ Johnson has a long way to go. The only reason he would be worth celebrating is because we have nobody else to play Buck.

    Love your face Roadie, but this one will age as well as @JHopkinsFS Twitter feed.
    I never thought he was very good. We’ll see.
    FremontTroll
  • TequillaTequilla Posts: 16,768
    10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments Seventh Anniversary
    BallzDeep said:

    Tequilla said:

    Unpopular opinion alert ...

    UW’s ability to win a National Title will require us to have a Top 10 National Defense that is generally sound and having an elite level QB that plays at an elite level

    For those of you think that 1991 is the only way to do it, that was less because we had elite players (outside of Emtman) but more because we had a defensive strategy that was largely new to college and teams weren’t largely ready to combat. In the 1992 Rose Bowl the D dominated Michigan. In 1993, Michigan put up 38 and Tyrone Wheatley ran all over us as teams started finding ways to exploit the defense.

    So unless we have plans on revolutionizing defensive football our best shot is to have an elite QB. And guess what you have a great chance of finding on the West Coast compared to the SEC ... it’s the ONLY competitive advantage we almost always will have on the field going forward.

    How'd that work out for USC and UCLA this season? It takes an entire team and you have to be elite on both lines of scrimmage to compete at that level. Having an elite QB doesn't mean shit if you don't have studs across the board in the trenches on both sides.
    Neither IMO played at an elite level ... at least on a consistent basis.

    Obviously you need good line play ... which traditionally we tend to hold our own there.

    But let’s be clear, we are never competing for the National Title with a team that can run it down someone’s throat. The only way we do so is having a QB with no fear that is willing and capable of making the throws and plays necessary.
    YellowSnow
Sign In or Register to comment.