Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Puppy warned once...
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
Now allow me to warn again. IF anybody thinks having Oregon's former AD on the committee had nothing to do with last weeks snub, think again.
If you're an SEC team rarely does "real" strength of schedule matter. THe committee always falls back on the excuse "the committee picks the 4 best teams". WHat a load of shit, why doesnt that same logic apply to Washington?
TAMU OOC schedule was pathetic. They went to double OT vs a horrible UCLA team, and had a loss. Yet they jumped an undefeated Washington who has blown everyone out but 1? THe committee thought subjectively that TAMU was the "better" team. SOS had zero to do with it. Oh, they showed up for Alabama, that must have been it. No,THey play in the SEC, that must have been it. As we saw, the 2nd "best" SEC team just lost to a team on par with UCLA. STick that up your cunts till tuesday assho's
Time to put SOS aside, stick to the same logic that put TAMU at #4, and place UW rightfully at #4, because on paper they are one of the 4 best fucking teams. However our buddy from Oregon could see to it to that wont happen, through personal vote and influence on the rest of the committee.
Nothing would surprise me. Politics are as stanky in the CFP as they are the presidential election. OHio St could likely jump UW tuesday, cant wait.
If you're an SEC team rarely does "real" strength of schedule matter. THe committee always falls back on the excuse "the committee picks the 4 best teams". WHat a load of shit, why doesnt that same logic apply to Washington?
TAMU OOC schedule was pathetic. They went to double OT vs a horrible UCLA team, and had a loss. Yet they jumped an undefeated Washington who has blown everyone out but 1? THe committee thought subjectively that TAMU was the "better" team. SOS had zero to do with it. Oh, they showed up for Alabama, that must have been it. No,THey play in the SEC, that must have been it. As we saw, the 2nd "best" SEC team just lost to a team on par with UCLA. STick that up your cunts till tuesday assho's
Time to put SOS aside, stick to the same logic that put TAMU at #4, and place UW rightfully at #4, because on paper they are one of the 4 best fucking teams. However our buddy from Oregon could see to it to that wont happen, through personal vote and influence on the rest of the committee.
Nothing would surprise me. Politics are as stanky in the CFP as they are the presidential election. OHio St could likely jump UW tuesday, cant wait.
Comments
2. Clemson
3. Michigan
4. Ohio St
5. Louisville
6. Auburn
7. LSU
8. Washington/FSU/Nebraska
http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/polls
entertaining and after all that is the motto of this site.
I don't much care if OSU jumps to 4th this week.
In the final reckoning, they know the Big 12 has
already eliminated itself from the playoff. They won't have
the balls to eliminate another conference from the Final
4. Too much lost TV revenue and bad will to overcome
to boot out 2 of the Power 5 champions. Undefeated we
are locked and still think a decent shot if one loss.
The only guy I sort of trust is the USA Today reporter and maybe the Central Michigan coach. Ty seems like type of vindictive, bitter asswipe who will do his best to screw his old team. The amount of southerners is a damn joke.
Do you really think that Dan Mullens is trying to tank UW? He's busy taking dictation from Phil Knight and Pat Kilkenny about whose agents he needs to call to get the football coach vacancy filled.
W,JW
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/32421/undefeated-washington-will-still-miss-the-playoffs/p1
But that's for the best. An undefeated Washington is going to get in. Being at #5 increases the chances of going undefeated.
Win out, nothing else matters.
aTm was above us because their only loss was at the Bama Dynasty.
OSU lost to fucking James Franklin