Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

The Atlantic Monthly has only ever endorsed 3 prez candidates in their history

OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
1. Lincoln
2. Roosevelt
3. Clinton (H.R.)

What a great time to be alive, with all of the history we are seeing.
«1345

Comments

  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Commie shit in. Commie shit out.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,589
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    2001400ex said:

    Commie shit in. Commie shit out.

    Don't plagiarize my shit fucko!
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,518
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    OZONE said:

    1. Lincoln
    2. Roosevelt
    3. Clinton (H.R.)

    What a great time to be alive, with all of the history we are seeing.

    One of these is not like the others


    I recall at the time that the article on Lincoln had little effect on the election
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,298
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    edited October 2016
    OZONE under traditional campaigns this would be exciting news for you. However, for this campaign media endorsements may actually have the opposite effect you think it has.
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.
  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,298
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    OZONE said:

    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.

    How many outlets endorsed Trump in the primary?

    My point being: This isn't your typical election rodeo.
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper

    OZONE said:

    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.

    How many outlets endorsed Trump in the primary?

    My point being: This isn't your typical election rodeo.
    Trump's base was enough to win him the (R) nomination. That is all.

    I say Clinton wins the big event rather easily... say 365 electoral college votes to 173
  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,298
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.

    How many outlets endorsed Trump in the primary?

    My point being: This isn't your typical election rodeo.
    Trump's base was enough to win him the (R) nomination. That is all.

    I say Clinton wins the big event rather easily... say 365 electoral college votes to 173
    Flagged for not preceding your retarded prediction with 5 reasons.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,780
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited October 2016
    So, what you're saying is the media are a bunch of lemmings in the tank for Clinton. This is news?
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Commie shit in. Commie shit out.

    Don't plagiarize my shit fucko!
    Are you knew hear?
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited October 2016

    So, what you're saying is the media are a bunch of lemmings in the tank for Clinton. This is news?

    No I'm not saying that. That would be spin from the Trump camp, that knows he is going to get his shit pushed in by a woman that has a larger cock than he does.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    OZONE said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited October 2016

    OZONE said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.

    By the way, Trump dislike's cripples too. Nice company you are keeping.
  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,298
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.
    Fighting Nazism and the Japanese in World War II got us out of the great depression. They were one in the same, not one separate from the other.
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited October 2016

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.
    Fighting Nazism and the Japanese in World War II got us out of the great depression. They were one in the same, not one separate from the other.
    They were separate, at least, in that one fight started before the other. I don't disagree that WW2 had a huge impact on getting us out of the depression, but they started as separate efforts, and the fact that they were so intertwined doesn't change Roosevelt's accomplishments.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.

    By the way, Trump dislike's cripples too. Nice company you are keeping.
    He did jack shit for 9 years then got Pearl Harbored into the war.

    #ProfileInCourage
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,780
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.

    By the way, Trump dislike's cripples too. Nice company you are keeping.
    He did jack shit for 9 years then got Pearl Harbored into the war.

    #ProfileInCourage
    Bullshit! He banged so many women, even Kennedy couldn't catch up with him. Eleanor was a dyke, and ole FDR had his pole-smoking mistress living at the white house for awhile. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    He got a lot of New Deal programs passed into law, to protect American jobs and create Social Security. Most of those have been repealed or neutered with the bipartisan support of Democrats, who claim to support American workers, but don't. And when Social Security gets raided, which it will, Democrats will support the effort, no matter what they say today.
Sign In or Register to comment.