Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Atlantic Monthly has only ever endorsed 3 prez candidates in their history

OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
in Tug Tavern
1. Lincoln
2. Roosevelt
3. Clinton (H.R.)

What a great time to be alive, with all of the history we are seeing.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Commie shit in. Commie shit out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,655 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Commie shit in. Commie shit out.

    Don't plagiarize my shit fucko!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,459 Founders Club
    OZONE said:

    1. Lincoln
    2. Roosevelt
    3. Clinton (H.R.)

    What a great time to be alive, with all of the history we are seeing.

    One of these is not like the others


    I recall at the time that the article on Lincoln had little effect on the election
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,382
    edited October 2016
    OZONE under traditional campaigns this would be exciting news for you. However, for this campaign media endorsements may actually have the opposite effect you think it has.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,382
    OZONE said:

    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.

    How many outlets endorsed Trump in the primary?

    My point being: This isn't your typical election rodeo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    greenblood said:

    OZONE said:

    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.

    How many outlets endorsed Trump in the primary?

    My point being: This isn't your typical election rodeo.
    Trump's base was enough to win him the (R) nomination. That is all.

    I say Clinton wins the big event rather easily... say 365 electoral college votes to 173
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,382
    OZONE said:

    greenblood said:

    OZONE said:

    See my earlier response in the other thread. I don't think the endorsements affect the voting, I think they predict it.

    How many outlets endorsed Trump in the primary?

    My point being: This isn't your typical election rodeo.
    Trump's base was enough to win him the (R) nomination. That is all.

    I say Clinton wins the big event rather easily... say 365 electoral college votes to 173
    Flagged for not preceding your retarded prediction with 5 reasons.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,942 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2016
    So, what you're saying is the media are a bunch of lemmings in the tank for Clinton. This is news?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Commie shit in. Commie shit out.

    Don't plagiarize my shit fucko!
    Are you knew hear?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited October 2016
    TurdBuffer said:

    So, what you're saying is the media are a bunch of lemmings in the tank for Clinton. This is news?

    No I'm not saying that. That would be spin from the Trump camp, that knows he is going to get his shit pushed in by a woman that has a larger cock than he does.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited October 2016
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.

    By the way, Trump dislike's cripples too. Nice company you are keeping.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,382
    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.
    Fighting Nazism and the Japanese in World War II got us out of the great depression. They were one in the same, not one separate from the other.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited October 2016
    greenblood said:

    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.
    Fighting Nazism and the Japanese in World War II got us out of the great depression. They were one in the same, not one separate from the other.
    They were separate, at least, in that one fight started before the other. I don't disagree that WW2 had a huge impact on getting us out of the depression, but they started as separate efforts, and the fact that they were so intertwined doesn't change Roosevelt's accomplishments.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.

    By the way, Trump dislike's cripples too. Nice company you are keeping.
    He did jack shit for 9 years then got Pearl Harbored into the war.

    #ProfileInCourage
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,942 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    OZONE said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Which Roosevelt...the good one or the cripple?

    The one elected to 3 terms
    The selfish cripple.

    Got it.
    If you want to call working to get the US out of the great depression, while also helping the free world fight off Nazism -- selfish, that is your choice.

    By the way, Trump dislike's cripples too. Nice company you are keeping.
    He did jack shit for 9 years then got Pearl Harbored into the war.

    #ProfileInCourage
    Bullshit! He banged so many women, even Kennedy couldn't catch up with him. Eleanor was a dyke, and ole FDR had his pole-smoking mistress living at the white house for awhile. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    He got a lot of New Deal programs passed into law, to protect American jobs and create Social Security. Most of those have been repealed or neutered with the bipartisan support of Democrats, who claim to support American workers, but don't. And when Social Security gets raided, which it will, Democrats will support the effort, no matter what they say today.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.