Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Who won the FIRST!!! debate?
Comments
-
You state that like Lester wanted Trump to lose. Get it yet?greenblood said:
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.2001400ex said:
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.greenblood said:
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs. -
TRUMPHe did and does. Not obvious to you or they won't let you admit it?
-
I told you he was the whitest black guy alive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs.
-
CLITON
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.RaceBannon said:
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMOgreenblood said:
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.2001400ex said:
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.greenblood said:
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs.
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
-
CLITON
You first.RaceBannon said:
They should kill themselvesgreenblood said:
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.2001400ex said:
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.greenblood said:
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs. -
Going racist is exactly what is expected from Troomps. Nice work filling the stereotype.PurpleThrobber said:
I told you he was the whitest black guy alive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs. -
J?
I said it first so you have to just do itBennyBeaver said:
You first.RaceBannon said:
They should kill themselvesgreenblood said:
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.2001400ex said:
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.greenblood said:
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs. -
J?
I'm giving intelligent analysis. Not surprised it is over your headBallSacked said:
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.RaceBannon said:
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMOgreenblood said:
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.2001400ex said:
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.greenblood said:
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs.
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps. -
CLITON
Disagree.RaceBannon said:
I'm giving intelligent analysis.BallSacked said:
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.RaceBannon said:
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMOgreenblood said:
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.2001400ex said:
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.greenblood said:
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs.
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
You're blaming the refs. Every thread. Sad!
-
J?
Simple thoughts from a simple mind. Sad to see how far a UCLA education has fallenBallSacked said:
Disagree.RaceBannon said:
I'm giving intelligent analysis.BallSacked said:
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.RaceBannon said:
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMOgreenblood said:
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.2001400ex said:
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.greenblood said:
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.2001400ex said:
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?greenblood said:
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
And losers blame the refs.
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
You're blaming the refs. Every thread. Sad!
