Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who won the FIRST!!! debate?

24

Comments

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    TRUMP
    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    J?

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    There's that loser talk again.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?
    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    TRUMP

    I was busy waiting tables at my night job. A "job" is this thing that you go to where you accomplish tasks as efficiently as you can in exchange for money, in case any of you Clinton supporters are confused.

    You should have earned a useful college degree.
    I have a degree in internet message board posting. It's been chincredibly useful. See?
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    CLITON

    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers

    Great blame the refs post as always!

    Hopefully next time a question is brought up about cyber security, Trump will remember to talk about personal email servers and less about Rosie O'Donnell.

    Losers lose.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers

    Great blame the refs post as always!

    Hopefully next time a question is brought up about cyber security, Trump will remember to talk about personal email servers and less about Rosie O'Donnell.

    Losers lose.
    Good point. Classy post
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers

    Trump has a much better chance to win the second debate given he won't be on stage.

    HTH
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    TRUMP
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO

    The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    You state that like Lester wanted Trump to lose. Get it yet?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    TRUMP
    He did and does. Not obvious to you or they won't let you admit it?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,066
    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    I told you he was the whitest black guy alive.

  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    CLITON

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO

    The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
    Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.

    Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    CLITON

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    They should kill themselves
    You first.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    I told you he was the whitest black guy alive.

    Going racist is exactly what is expected from Troomps. Nice work filling the stereotype.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    They should kill themselves
    You first.
    I said it first so you have to just do it
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO

    The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
    Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.

    Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
    I'm giving intelligent analysis. Not surprised it is over your head
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited September 2016
    CLITON

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO

    The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
    Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.

    Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
    I'm giving intelligent analysis.
    Disagree.

    You're blaming the refs. Every thread. Sad!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO

    The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
    Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.

    Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
    I'm giving intelligent analysis.
    Disagree.

    You're blaming the refs. Every thread. Sad!
    Simple thoughts from a simple mind. Sad to see how far a UCLA education has fallen
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    J?
    I love the racism accusations from 1974. Wasn't everyone racist as fuck back then? Yet, race relations were actually better, because people were more open and honest about it than today, so shit actually got done and progress actually happened. I guarantee N-word jokes got big laughs at Bill and Hill's Arkansas Mansion back in the 1970's, but now Hill's all down with the AA peeps. Yeah, right.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    J?

    I love the racism accusations from 1974. Wasn't everyone racist as fuck back then? Yet, race relations were actually better, because people were more open and honest about it than today, so shit actually got done and progress actually happened. I guarantee N-word jokes got big laughs at Bill and Hill's Arkansas Mansion back in the 1970's, but now Hill's all down with the AA peeps. Yeah, right.

    The greatest contribution Trump has made in this campaign is that he has shown how racist everyone still is.

    It never went away. He just made people feel comfortable about expressing their racism again.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    I love the racism accusations from 1974. Wasn't everyone racist as fuck back then? Yet, race relations were actually better, because people were more open and honest about it than today, so shit actually got done and progress actually happened. I guarantee N-word jokes got big laughs at Bill and Hill's Arkansas Mansion back in the 1970's, but now Hill's all down with the AA peeps. Yeah, right.

    The greatest contribution Trump has made in this campaign is that he has shown how racist everyone still is.

    It never went away. He just made people feel comfortable about expressing their racism again.
    Welcome to Oregon


    And great racial healing of America by Obama as always. I blame Trump
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    J?

    The greatest contribution Trump has made in this campaign is that he has shown how racist everyone still is.

    It never went away. He just made people feel comfortable about expressing their racism again.

    We've done it! Everyone is Equal!! At Last!!

    Great point, Boobs!
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    J?

    The greatest contribution Trump has made in this campaign is that he has shown how racist everyone still is.

    It never went away. He just made people feel comfortable about expressing their racism again.

    We've done it! Everyone is Equal!! At Last!!

    Great point, Boobs!
    I'm the great uniter.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?
    We stopped in Oregon once over 30 years ago and ever since my wife has insisted that we drive straight through.

    Great state. Lots of mighty fine white folks there
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    edited September 2016
    J?

    We stopped in Oregon once over 30 years ago and ever since my wife has insisted that we drive straight through.

    Great state. Lots of mighty fine white folks there

    Everything south of Eugene is Trump Country. I'd want to get the fuck out too if I was your wife.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    We stopped in Oregon once over 30 years ago and ever since my wife has insisted that we drive straight through.

    Great state. Lots of mighty fine white folks there

    Everything south of Eugene is Trump Country. I'd want to get the fuck out too if I was your wife.
    She was quite clear it started at the Columbia River
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    J?

    We stopped in Oregon once over 30 years ago and ever since my wife has insisted that we drive straight through.

    Great state. Lots of mighty fine white folks there

    Everything south of Eugene is Trump Country. I'd want to get the fuck out too if I was your wife.
    She was quite clear it started at the Nisqually River
    Fact check.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,879 Founders Club
    J?

    We stopped in Oregon once over 30 years ago and ever since my wife has insisted that we drive straight through.

    Great state. Lots of mighty fine white folks there

    Everything south of Eugene is Trump Country. I'd want to get the fuck out too if I was your wife.
    She was quite clear it started at the Nisqually River
    Fact check.
    you don't think Portland is filled with racists? I lived in Seattle dude. Liberal enclaves are not bastions of tolerance for the Blacks