PM to Jennifer Cohen
Comments
-
Or a football coach that looks like Mark Mangino?TurdBuffer said:
Disagree. An AD should at least appear to possess some degree of athleticism, not look like Boss Hogg.Tequilla said:
A highly visible role like the AD of a P5 program should be held to high standards and accountable for their results. Calling them out on their performance is perfectly acceptable. Judging their performance based on how you contribute your $$$ is perfectly acceptable. Being degrading about them is crossing the line.dnc said:
You're saying it's okay to say she's not good at her job, but it's not okay so say she's a stupid cunt?Tequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
We all cross the line from time to time and that's life. But there's a difference between crossing the line, understanding you crossed it and apologizing versus continuing to not only go over the line (way over) and showing no regard in the process.
Again, that just tunes people out ... particularly if that is an audience that you'd like to have an ear of. -
Taking ourselves too seriously is half the problem with UW. The problem with academic types is that they exude elitism by acting like they need to have their intelligence taken seriously at all times. That's called being a smart dumbass and the vast majority of the world (i.e. actual humans) don't think that way or respond to it very well.Tequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
-
P.S. "Half" is only a ruff estimate here. I didn't do a statistical study or shove my t-test prongs up a horse's ass to figure that out.
-
The problem with academic types is that they think that their utopian solutions that are based in theory work in the real world and because of that the opinion of the "little man" isn't important.PurpleJ said:
Taking ourselves too seriously is half the problem with UW. The problem with academic types is that they exude elitism by acting like they need to have their intelligence taken seriously at all times. That's called being a smart dumbass and the vast majority of the world (i.e. actual humans) don't think that way or respond to it very well.Tequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
If there's anything that the world should have learned from the Brexit vote, that's it. -
Thank you for proving my point. My toothless retard southerners are kicking your ass.
-
Hi Kim!Tequilla said:
A highly visible role like the AD of a P5 program should be held to high standards and accountable for their results. Calling them out on their performance is perfectly acceptable. Judging their performance based on how you contribute your $$$ is perfectly acceptable. Being degrading about them is crossing the line.dnc said:
You're saying it's okay to say she's not good at her job, but it's not okay so say she's a stupid cunt?Tequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
We all cross the line from time to time and that's life. But there's a difference between crossing the line, understanding you crossed it and apologizing versus continuing to not only go over the line (way over) and showing no regard in the process.
Again, that just tunes people out ... particularly if that is an audience that you'd like to have an ear of. -
That's because you know you don't belong here.Tequilla said:
Fully knew when I said what I said in this thread that it was going to get met with giant resistance.TurdBuffer said:Damn, Teq! Did I tee you up, or did you tee yourself up? Just tryna help.
LEAVE -
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line. -
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved. -
Maybe "we" are just too good to associate ourselves with those barbaric, misogynistic, uneducated football fans.
Please send cash.
