PM to Jennifer Cohen
Comments
-
I agree....but it's a small number. Using this board or Dawgman as any sort of barometer is a mistake IMO. Reasonable people expect a top 25 most years, and a Rose Bowl every three or four years, plus top half of the Pac finishes every year. There's no excuse for those things not being achieved.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Every team has its downs. Negadawg favorite Bammer was nothing as recently as 2007 and throughout a lot of the 90s and 2000s. Michigan, Texas, Ohio St from '99-2001 and '87 to '92..Lsu in the 90s....Miami, USC, and Nebraska now..Oklahomo was 3-8 in the late 90s....The teams that turned it around didn't pussyfoot around and play p.c. games like UW has. The admin., ad, boosters, coaches, and fans made it a priority. I see scattered evidence of it here and there, but it's not close to enough. As I've said, if Petersen succeeds, it's going to be despite some obstacles, not because of an awesome administration and athletic department. They're busy shooting videos of fugly, steroid-filled girl's sports "stars" dancing to the happy song and making slick Twitter logos celebrating 3,000 "new" season tickets and this weeks latest retina killing uniform combo. -
It's not about using this board as a barometer. It's about listening to the vast amount of smarts and savvy we have here.
But I wrote the original post in jest, knowing that Cohen has stated she hates HardcoreHusky.com. Of course she's never going to use it as a resource. -
Sounds like she is only reading the poasts where we talk about her sloppy tits.DerekJohnson said:It's not about using this board as a barometer. It's about listening to the vast amount of smarts and savvy we have here.
But I wrote the original post in jest, knowing that Cohen has stated she hates HardcoreHusky.com. Of course she's never going to use it as a resource. -
Has she actually mentioned this bored? FREE PUB!!!1!1DerekJohnson said:It's not about using this board as a barometer. It's about listening to the vast amount of smarts and savvy we have here.
But I wrote the original post in jest, knowing that Cohen has stated she hates HardcoreHusky.com. Of course she's never going to use it as a resource. -
It ranges from new anal beads to slightly used anal beads to anal beads that spend more time in than out.Swaye said:
I wasn't aware there are any other kind of beads.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I assume slightly used anal beads are sufficient.Swaye said:
I'm going to need reparations and a trigger warning for that comment. I accept beads as payment.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
In your defense, our people gave your people horse blankets a couple centuries ago and you're still devastated by that incident.Swaye said:
I did edit it with something similar to abundance. In my defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're better than this.Swaye said:
Are you talking to @Cohen12 or Derek?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Show us your tits and all will be forgiven.
-
This. I thought it was 2007 again and Kim was telling us to be better poasters.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Hi Kim!Tequilla said:
A highly visible role like the AD of a P5 program should be held to high standards and accountable for their results. Calling them out on their performance is perfectly acceptable. Judging their performance based on how you contribute your $$$ is perfectly acceptable. Being degrading about them is crossing the line.dnc said:
You're saying it's okay to say she's not good at her job, but it's not okay so say she's a stupid cunt?Tequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
We all cross the line from time to time and that's life. But there's a difference between crossing the line, understanding you crossed it and apologizing versus continuing to not only go over the line (way over) and showing no regard in the process.
Again, that just tunes people out ... particularly if that is an audience that you'd like to have an ear of. -
The AD shouldn't like us, the AD should fear us and our outrageous ideas about win or GTFO. Like every bullshit corporation, the AD wants to do nothing and hope that the market accepts it (IE ticket sales). If we have the fans we have the leverage. The question is do we want to appeal to the masses more to grow our leverage? I think that's what we're talking about.
-
I acted exactly like I act here for 23 years in the Army. Was quite successful by all metrics I'm aware ofTequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
-
Thank you for you're service. Your truly a great American and *we owe you a debt of gratitude.koopdog said:
I acted exactly like I act here for 23 years in the Army. Was quite successful by all metrics I'm aware ofTequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
Now shut the fuck up and stop hijacking posts!!!! -
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
