Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
PM to Jennifer Cohen
Comments
-
I agree....but it's a small number. Using this board or Dawgman as any sort of barometer is a mistake IMO. Reasonable people expect a top 25 most years, and a Rose Bowl every three or four years, plus top half of the Pac finishes every year. There's no excuse for those things not being achieved.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Every team has its downs. Negadawg favorite Bammer was nothing as recently as 2007 and throughout a lot of the 90s and 2000s. Michigan, Texas, Ohio St from '99-2001 and '87 to '92..Lsu in the 90s....Miami, USC, and Nebraska now..Oklahomo was 3-8 in the late 90s....The teams that turned it around didn't pussyfoot around and play p.c. games like UW has. The admin., ad, boosters, coaches, and fans made it a priority. I see scattered evidence of it here and there, but it's not close to enough. As I've said, if Petersen succeeds, it's going to be despite some obstacles, not because of an awesome administration and athletic department. They're busy shooting videos of fugly, steroid-filled girl's sports "stars" dancing to the happy song and making slick Twitter logos celebrating 3,000 "new" season tickets and this weeks latest retina killing uniform combo. -
It's not about using this board as a barometer. It's about listening to the vast amount of smarts and savvy we have here.
But I wrote the original post in jest, knowing that Cohen has stated she hates HardcoreHusky.com. Of course she's never going to use it as a resource. -
Sounds like she is only reading the poasts where we talk about her sloppy tits.DerekJohnson said:It's not about using this board as a barometer. It's about listening to the vast amount of smarts and savvy we have here.
But I wrote the original post in jest, knowing that Cohen has stated she hates HardcoreHusky.com. Of course she's never going to use it as a resource. -
Has she actually mentioned this bored? FREE PUB!!!1!1DerekJohnson said:It's not about using this board as a barometer. It's about listening to the vast amount of smarts and savvy we have here.
But I wrote the original post in jest, knowing that Cohen has stated she hates HardcoreHusky.com. Of course she's never going to use it as a resource. -
It ranges from new anal beads to slightly used anal beads to anal beads that spend more time in than out.Swaye said:
I wasn't aware there are any other kind of beads.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I assume slightly used anal beads are sufficient.Swaye said:
I'm going to need reparations and a trigger warning for that comment. I accept beads as payment.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
In your defense, our people gave your people horse blankets a couple centuries ago and you're still devastated by that incident.Swaye said:
I did edit it with something similar to abundance. In my defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're better than this.Swaye said:
Are you talking to @Cohen12 or Derek?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Show us your tits and all will be forgiven.
-
This. I thought it was 2007 again and Kim was telling us to be better poasters.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Hi Kim!Tequilla said:
A highly visible role like the AD of a P5 program should be held to high standards and accountable for their results. Calling them out on their performance is perfectly acceptable. Judging their performance based on how you contribute your $$$ is perfectly acceptable. Being degrading about them is crossing the line.dnc said:
You're saying it's okay to say she's not good at her job, but it's not okay so say she's a stupid cunt?Tequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
We all cross the line from time to time and that's life. But there's a difference between crossing the line, understanding you crossed it and apologizing versus continuing to not only go over the line (way over) and showing no regard in the process.
Again, that just tunes people out ... particularly if that is an audience that you'd like to have an ear of. -
The AD shouldn't like us, the AD should fear us and our outrageous ideas about win or GTFO. Like every bullshit corporation, the AD wants to do nothing and hope that the market accepts it (IE ticket sales). If we have the fans we have the leverage. The question is do we want to appeal to the masses more to grow our leverage? I think that's what we're talking about.
-
I acted exactly like I act here for 23 years in the Army. Was quite successful by all metrics I'm aware ofTequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
-
Thank you for you're service. Your truly a great American and *we owe you a debt of gratitude.koopdog said:
I acted exactly like I act here for 23 years in the Army. Was quite successful by all metrics I'm aware ofTequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
Now shut the fuck up and stop hijacking posts!!!! -
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud. -
It's what I do. Eat a bowl of dicks.CaptainPJ said:
Thank you for you're service. Your truly a great American and *we owe you a debt of gratitude.koopdog said:
I acted exactly like I act here for 23 years in the Army. Was quite successful by all metrics I'm aware ofTequilla said:Just saying that there's more than 81% BS out here and the stuff that goes off the rails goes so far off the rails that there's no way that the AD is going to pay attention to the good suggestions that are made by this site ...
That's the point I was trying to make to DJ regarding whether this site was a hobby board versus a serious board. If you want the AD to take you seriously when you have thoughts/ideas, you probably should act in a way consistent with that. Nobody is going to act in their place of employment the way that they act here as you'd never be taken seriously.
Now shut the fuck up and stop hijacking posts!!!! -
Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
Solid poast. I am admittedly more doogish than some on hear but not when it comes to the administration of Husky athletics as I have railed upon on the poddings.
There's always a reason behind vitriol and anger if you care to drill down. HHBs can be dogmatic. But there's logic behind the dogma. And it's not hard to find.
Make football the most important thing at the UW. reward performance. Get rid of slackers. Run it like a business not a rainbow coalition. It's not a social experiment. Fuck the pussies. Go see the Seahawks admins for advice. They get it.
Fuck @puppylove_sugarsteel could do better.
How is this hard?
-
Anal Beads Superioty GuyCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It ranges from new anal beads to slightly used anal beads to anal beads that spend more time in than out.Swaye said:
I wasn't aware there are any other kind of beads.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I assume slightly used anal beads are sufficient.Swaye said:
I'm going to need reparations and a trigger warning for that comment. I accept beads as payment.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
In your defense, our people gave your people horse blankets a couple centuries ago and you're still devastated by that incident.Swaye said:
I did edit it with something similar to abundance. In my defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're better than this.Swaye said:
Are you talking to @Cohen12 or Derek?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Show us your tits and all will be forgiven.
-
Optimism is great. To Jen's credit, she's cut some people loose. Will she deliver? (Fuck, I'm sounding like KG) Past history isn't on her side. Show me. I've heard it. I want to see it.koopdog said:Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
Solid poast. I am admittedly more doogish than some on hear but not when it comes to the administration of Husky athletics as I have railed upon on the poddings.
There's always a reason behind vitriol and anger if you care to drill down. HHBs can be dogmatic. But there's logic behind the dogma. And it's not hard to find.
Make football the most important thing at the UW. reward performance. Get rid of slackers. Run it like a business not a rainbow coalition. It's not a social experiment. Fuck the pussies. Go see the Seahawks admins for advice. They get it.
Fuck @puppylove_sugarsteel could do better.
How is this hard?
Don James died. He won (fuck off Kim) Pumpy died. Pumpy was no Don James.
And Koop, thank you for your service. -
Aka mickens beadsCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It ranges from new anal beads to slightly used anal beads to anal beads that spend more time in than out.Swaye said:
I wasn't aware there are any other kind of beads.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I assume slightly used anal beads are sufficient.Swaye said:
I'm going to need reparations and a trigger warning for that comment. I accept beads as payment.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
In your defense, our people gave your people horse blankets a couple centuries ago and you're still devastated by that incident.Swaye said:
I did edit it with something similar to abundance. In my defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're better than this.Swaye said:
Are you talking to @Cohen12 or Derek?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Show us your tits and all will be forgiven.
ISAFNRC
-
Good. We're doing it right then.DerekJohnson said:Cohen has stated she hates HardcoreHusky.com.
-
Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships. Consistently sold out games and budget surplusesTequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud. -
Everyone needs to have a niche. This just happens to be mine.DerekJohnson said:
Anal Beads Superioty GuyCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It ranges from new anal beads to slightly used anal beads to anal beads that spend more time in than out.Swaye said:
I wasn't aware there are any other kind of beads.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I assume slightly used anal beads are sufficient.Swaye said:
I'm going to need reparations and a trigger warning for that comment. I accept beads as payment.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
In your defense, our people gave your people horse blankets a couple centuries ago and you're still devastated by that incident.Swaye said:
I did edit it with something similar to abundance. In my defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're better than this.Swaye said:
Are you talking to @Cohen12 or Derek?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Show us your tits and all will be forgiven.
-
YBEFire_Marshall_Bill said:
I agree....but it's a small number. Using this board or Dawgman as any sort of barometer is a mistake IMO. Reasonable people expect a top 25 most years, and a Rose Bowl every three or four years, plus top half of the Pac finishes every year. There's no excuse for those things not being achieved.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Every team has its downs. Negadawg favorite Bammer was nothing as recently as 2007 and throughout a lot of the 90s and 2000s. Michigan, Texas, Ohio St from '99-2001 and '87 to '92..Lsu in the 90s....Miami, USC, and Nebraska now..Oklahomo was 3-8 in the late 90s....The teams that turned it around didn't pussyfoot around and play p.c. games like UW has. The admin., ad, boosters, coaches, and fans made it a priority. I see scattered evidence of it here and there, but it's not close to enough. As I've said, if Petersen succeeds, it's going to be despite some obstacles, not because of an awesome administration and athletic department. They're busy shooting videos of fugly, steroid-filled girl's sports "stars" dancing to the happy song and making slick Twitter logos celebrating 3,000 "new" season tickets and this weeks latest retina killing uniform combo. -
IF this board holds this program to the above standards you spell out I'm in 100% agreement ... it's the standards that I've said for a long time are the realistic expectations for a SUCCESSFUL UW coach.Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
What I fear is that when UW loses a game this year it will be treated as if hell is freezing over and that Petersen needs to be immediately fired.
As for Cohen, her job will be evaluated based on her record and actions ... showing a picture taken with James as an indication that you are qualified for the job is a fucking joke. -
Anytime we loose a game this is how most of us feel.Tequilla said:
IF this board holds this program to the above standards you spell out I'm in 100% agreement ... it's the standards that I've said for a long time are the realistic expectations for a SUCCESSFUL UW coach.Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
What I fear is that when UW loses a game this year it will be treated as if hell is freezing over and that Petersen needs to be immediately fired.
As for Cohen, her job will be evaluated based on her record and actions ... showing a picture taken with James as an indication that you are qualified for the job is a fucking joke.
We would have fired Don James. -
Scott Woodward also cut some people loose.Baseman said:
Optimism is great. To Jen's credit, she's cut some people loose. Will she deliver? (Fuck, I'm sounding like KG) Past history isn't on her side. Show me. I've heard it. I want to see it.koopdog said:Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
Solid poast. I am admittedly more doogish than some on hear but not when it comes to the administration of Husky athletics as I have railed upon on the poddings.
There's always a reason behind vitriol and anger if you care to drill down. HHBs can be dogmatic. But there's logic behind the dogma. And it's not hard to find.
Make football the most important thing at the UW. reward performance. Get rid of slackers. Run it like a business not a rainbow coalition. It's not a social experiment. Fuck the pussies. Go see the Seahawks admins for advice. They get it.
Fuck @puppylove_sugarsteel could do better.
How is this hard?
Don James died. He won (fuck off Kim) Pumpy died. Pumpy was no Don James.
And Koop, thank you for your service. -
And that's the part that blows my mind ...dnc said:
Anytime we loose a game this is how most of us feel.Tequilla said:
IF this board holds this program to the above standards you spell out I'm in 100% agreement ... it's the standards that I've said for a long time are the realistic expectations for a SUCCESSFUL UW coach.Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
What I fear is that when UW loses a game this year it will be treated as if hell is freezing over and that Petersen needs to be immediately fired.
As for Cohen, her job will be evaluated based on her record and actions ... showing a picture taken with James as an indication that you are qualified for the job is a fucking joke.
We would have fired Don James.
There would have been a shit ton here that if TCU's season last year was what UW had this year would have been all over Patterson. He arguably had one of his better years last year.
I get the freaking out over one game ... but it's got to be balanced with perspective. -
Fuck perspectiveTequilla said:
And that's the part that blows my mind ...dnc said:
Anytime we loose a game this is how most of us feel.Tequilla said:
IF this board holds this program to the above standards you spell out I'm in 100% agreement ... it's the standards that I've said for a long time are the realistic expectations for a SUCCESSFUL UW coach.Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
What I fear is that when UW loses a game this year it will be treated as if hell is freezing over and that Petersen needs to be immediately fired.
As for Cohen, her job will be evaluated based on her record and actions ... showing a picture taken with James as an indication that you are qualified for the job is a fucking joke.
We would have fired Don James.
There would have been a shit ton here that if TCU's season last year was what UW had this year would have been all over Patterson. He arguably had one of his better years last year.
I get the freaking out over one game ... but it's got to be balanced with perspective. -
When you fear and assume defeat, you've already lost. It's better to aim to high and miss than shoot too low and hit. I expect this team to win every game. I hope Peterman and his team feel and play the same.Tequilla said:
IF this board holds this program to the above standards you spell out I'm in 100% agreement ... it's the standards that I've said for a long time are the realistic expectations for a SUCCESSFUL UW coach.Baseman said:
The problem you don't see, or chose to ignore, is many on this board are holding the program to standards it consistently achieved: winning and contending for confrence championships. Major Bowl Apperances. Final rankings in the Top-20 and occasionally real shots at National Championships.Tequilla said:
Texas is in the middle of this right now with Charlie Strong and how they handled the end of Mack Brown ...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've gone over the line since Gerberding. That's half the reason people act like this. Treat football in a (vomit) SEC, Texas (the state), or Michigan/ the OSU way, where it's a priority, and people will be happy..Tequilla said:In no way am I suggesting being Chest or the HFP ...
What I am saying is that you can be critical without going 5 miles over the line ... and let's be honest, there are some on this site that have no problem going way over the line.
Michigan got tired of hearing about how bad Lloyd Carr was and spent the better part of a decade unwinding from that mistake.
BS happens everywhere ... but it's been a while since the UW program has been run well.
Biggest problem I see is that there are some that are holding the program to standards that it has never achieved.
Jen Cohen can hate HH and write us off as crass hate filled morons. She can point to the picture of her taken with Don James. But if she doesn't deliver the results represented by the man in that photo she, just like the rest of you Doogs, is a fraud.
What I fear is that when UW loses a game this year it will be treated as if hell is freezing over and that Petersen needs to be immediately fired.
As for Cohen, her job will be evaluated based on her record and actions ... showing a picture taken with James as an indication that you are qualified for the job is a fucking joke.
Nick Sabans teams win not just on talent but on process. Each man on the field is expected to win every play. Saban doesn't think too far ahead - no hypotheticals from Nick.
The Formula: A) win each play
Win the game C) win each game D) Win the Natty E) Hoist the trophy.
Know it. Live it. Poast accordingly.
(NT) -
@Baseman
In the process I absolutely agree with you
As an outsider, holding people to a standard of perfection isn't realistic -
You're still here?Tequilla said:@Baseman
In the process I absolutely agree with you
As an outsider, holding people to a standard of perfection isn't realistic
Allow me to help:
http://www.dawgman.com -
Me: "Hey boss, when you say no damages and no injuries on any job ever I know that's just the process we strive for as a company but from the outside our customers understand that standard of perfection isn't realistic."Tequilla said:@Baseman
In the process I absolutely agree with you
As an outsider, holding people to a standard of perfection isn't realistic
Boss: "You're fired." -
TwistingCheersWestDawg said:
Me: "Hey boss, when you say no damages and no injuries on any job ever I know that's just the process we strive for as a company but from the outside our customers understand that standard of perfection isn't realistic."Tequilla said:@Baseman
In the process I absolutely agree with you
As an outsider, holding people to a standard of perfection isn't realistic
Boss: "You're fired."
