The point of this thread is Hillary's continuing infatuation with women and gay hating Muslims.
Try to stay on topic. The Orlando killers dad and now this, her COS is a gay basher and thinks women don't belong in the workplace.
Very bad for Hillary. Really bad
I agree, but since when do you care about Muslims?
Next you'll tell me than Hondo cares about the blacks.
Once again unlike the mouthy libs here, I actually employ a Muslim. More to the point I care about women and don't think gays deserve to be gunned down in a nightclub
In other words, this woman had views 10 years ago, on women's rights, that are similar to Trump's views today? Wow, how radical of her.
No
Not at all
Read the article you linked.
The main complaint is that she didn't support women's rights to the degree that Clinton did while she wrote for a Saudi publication.
Sounds just like Trump, who still doesn't support women's rights to the degree that Clinton does.
HTH
Trump supports Women and their rights more than Hillary in actions and words.
Then why do woman voters overwhelmingly prefer Clinton?
Trump could be the chair of the "National Association of Female Executives", "National Association of Women Business Owners", and "National Organization of Women" simultaneously and he still wouldn't carry the female vote, because he has the wrong genitalia. It's the same reason Hillary will never carry the male vote. But I'm sure you already knew that...dumbass
The only demographic that Clinton is not currently carrying is uneducated males, she is leading in the demographic of educated males... but I'm sure you already knew that... dumbass.
What's the overall male vote? Way to move the goalpost as always...dumbass
At the moment (last ~4 days) Clinton actually leads Trump in the male vote.
Trump only leads in the uneducated white male demographic.
Which direction would you prefer the goalposts be moved to support whatever argument you are trying to make?
One NBC poll has Hillary with a one point lead proves your point? Right below it Bloomberg had Trump up, and it's polls lean liberal. Finding one poll out of 30 doesn't support your position, just like you had mentioned when 1-2 polls had Trump up in the general a month ago. The basis was the male vote, you changed the goalpost by using a sub-segment of men. I went back to the original argument as men in general. Try again...
In other words, this woman had views 10 years ago, on women's rights, that are similar to Trump's views today? Wow, how radical of her.
No
Not at all
Read the article you linked.
The main complaint is that she didn't support women's rights to the degree that Clinton did while she wrote for a Saudi publication.
Sounds just like Trump, who still doesn't support women's rights to the degree that Clinton does.
HTH
Trump supports Women and their rights more than Hillary in actions and words.
Then why do woman voters overwhelmingly prefer Clinton?
Trump could be the chair of the "National Association of Female Executives", "National Association of Women Business Owners", and "National Organization of Women" simultaneously and he still wouldn't carry the female vote, because he has the wrong genitalia. It's the same reason Hillary will never carry the male vote. But I'm sure you already knew that...dumbass
The only demographic that Clinton is not currently carrying is uneducated males, she is leading in the demographic of educated males... but I'm sure you already knew that... dumbass.
What's the overall male vote? Way to move the goalpost as always...dumbass
At the moment (last ~4 days) Clinton actually leads Trump in the male vote.
Trump only leads in the uneducated white male demographic.
Which direction would you prefer the goalposts be moved to support whatever argument you are trying to make?
One NBC poll has Hillary with a one point lead proves your point? Right below it Bloomberg had Trump up, and it's polls lean liberal. Finding one poll out of 30 doesn't support your position, just like you had mentioned when 1-2 polls had Trump up in the general a month ago. The basis was the male vote, you changed the goalpost by using a sub-segment of men. I went back to the original argument as men in general. Try again...
Your the one trying to prove a point... which is that Clinton is only winning women because she is a woman.... rather than it being her policies. When is the last time any (R) beat the (D) with the female vote? Was it due to the gender of the candidate? But this time it is? Right....
I've now shown you a major, current, poll that shows her winning men as well.
Maybe what they say about Trump's small hands is true?
Still seems to bother him, and some of you guys, that he is losing, soundly, to a woman.
In other words, this woman had views 10 years ago, on women's rights, that are similar to Trump's views today? Wow, how radical of her.
No
Not at all
Read the article you linked.
The main complaint is that she didn't support women's rights to the degree that Clinton did while she wrote for a Saudi publication.
Sounds just like Trump, who still doesn't support women's rights to the degree that Clinton does.
HTH
Trump supports Women and their rights more than Hillary in actions and words.
Then why do woman voters overwhelmingly prefer Clinton?
Trump could be the chair of the "National Association of Female Executives", "National Association of Women Business Owners", and "National Organization of Women" simultaneously and he still wouldn't carry the female vote, because he has the wrong genitalia. It's the same reason Hillary will never carry the male vote. But I'm sure you already knew that...dumbass
The only demographic that Clinton is not currently carrying is uneducated males, she is leading in the demographic of educated males... but I'm sure you already knew that... dumbass.
What's the overall male vote? Way to move the goalpost as always...dumbass
At the moment (last ~4 days) Clinton actually leads Trump in the male vote.
Trump only leads in the uneducated white male demographic.
Which direction would you prefer the goalposts be moved to support whatever argument you are trying to make?
One NBC poll has Hillary with a one point lead proves your point? Right below it Bloomberg had Trump up, and it's polls lean liberal. Finding one poll out of 30 doesn't support your position, just like you had mentioned when 1-2 polls had Trump up in the general a month ago. The basis was the male vote, you changed the goalpost by using a sub-segment of men. I went back to the original argument as men in general. Try again...
Your the one trying to prove a point... which is that Clinton is only winning women because she is a woman.... rather than it being her policies. When is the last time any (R) beat the (D) with the female vote? Was it due to the gender of the candidate? But this time it is? Right....
I've now shown you a major, current, poll that shows her winning men as well.
Maybe what they say about Trump's small hands is true?
Still seems to bother him, and some of you guys, that he is losing, soundly, to a woman.
The point of this thread is Hillary's continuing infatuation with women and gay hating Muslims.
Try to stay on topic. The Orlando killers dad and now this, her COS is a gay basher and thinks women don't belong in the workplace.
Very bad for Hillary. Really bad
I agree, but since when do you care about Muslims?
Next you'll tell me than Hondo cares about the blacks.
Once again unlike the mouthy libs here, I actually employ a Muslim. More to the point I care about women and don't think gays deserve to be gunned down in a nightclub
Comments
So... if Clinton doesn't beat Trump by 20... then you'll claim a moral victory?
The last 20 years of being a Husky fan appears to be taking a toll...
Try to stay on topic. The Orlando killers dad and now this, her COS is a gay basher and thinks women don't belong in the workplace.
Very bad for Hillary. Really bad
Next you'll tell me than Hondo cares about the blacks.
Maybe you feel differently. So be it
I've now shown you a major, current, poll that shows her winning men as well.
Maybe what they say about Trump's small hands is true?
Still seems to bother him, and some of you guys, that he is losing, soundly, to a woman.
It's working.
WHAT DOES OZONE HAVE TO SAY NOW!!!/???????111ONE
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/fbi-uncovered-at-least-14900-more-documents-in-clinton-email-investigation/2016/08/22/36745578-6643-11e6-be4e-23fc4d4d12b4_story.html