Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Predict whOregon's record

12346»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)
    Tequilla said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.

    Dialed in
    Great vote as always
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)
    AIRWOLF said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Southerndawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
    For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.
    It was factually correct at the time.

    He did what great coaches are supposed to do in year 3.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,232
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.

    Dialed in
    Great vote as always
    I definitely didn't have Oregon at 4-8 ... I think I was thinking more in the 7-5 to 8-4 range ...

    My "dialed in" was more in reference to saying that Oregon would have the same record as UW and Oregon would beat UW once again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,807 Founders Club
    8-4
    BallSacked said:

    Simple fact

    @BallSacked you got something right for once! Pumpy might have room for you on his higher discussion board!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Southerndawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
    For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.
    It was factually correct at the time.

    He did what great coaches are supposed to do in year 3.

    It was never factually correct. But keep telling yourself whatever you need to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)
    AIRWOLF said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Southerndawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
    For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.
    It was factually correct at the time.

    He did what great coaches are supposed to do in year 3.

    It was never factually correct. But keep telling yourself whatever you need to.
    9-9 > 8-10.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,389
    12-0 (I'm delusional)
    I'd just like to point out that I admitted I was totally delusional upfront, and was therefore correct.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    8-4
    For the record I projected a downward trend, I just didn't think it would fall off a cliff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter