Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Predict whOregon's record
Comments
-
8-4I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.
-
Definition of playing both sides ...RoadDawg55 said:I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.
If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...
If they win the North, you'lldoogquack up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.
It's not that hard to understand ... -
Already drinking beer so I am voting 11-1
-
6-6I forgot I started this poll. I got off work early and have been drinking ever since I got home. Cool story Bill
-
They should be Chinwhoreable!!!!!!!!!
Their turn to go 0-12!!!!! -
RaceBannon said:
Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:
Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable. -
8-4
I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable. -
You're a smart Duck.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
