Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Predict whOregon's record
Comments
-
4-8 or worse
No one wins when you choose between Billy Bobs.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?
-
8-4
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil. -
8-4
Screen shotTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)
8-10 is worse than 9-9.greenblood said:
Screen shotTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
Quooks hate facts. -
8-4
Doogs gonna Doog.DerekJohnson said:The man who raged against people saying Chincredible, refers to Oregon as WhOregon.
-
9-3 (status quo...we're just reloading for next year!!!!)IPukeOregonGrellow said:
No one wins when you choose between Billy Bobs.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?
I always thought Peterman looks like guy pearce, but this is well done.
Edit: while searching for a picture to post I found out that he is banging Melisandre. That fucker. -
State Penn????
-
I think he's doing an OK! jobTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)
DisagreeRaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil. -
4-8 or worseJust would like to point out i was right.. I now feel validated
-
Good job .. or good luck, either way, cheers!backthepack said:Just would like to point out i was right.. I now feel validated
-
4-8 or worse
The Roof Robbins crystal ball told meSoutherndawg said:
Good job .. or good luck, either way, cheers!backthepack said:Just would like to point out i was right.. I now feel validated
-
9-3 (status quo...we're just reloading for next year!!!!)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
-
12-0 (I'm delusional)
It's still accurate.dnc said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable. -
4-8 or worseDialed in.
-
Dialed inRoadDawg55 said:I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.
-
YBEEBallSacked said:Simple fact
-
For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)
Great vote as alwaysTequilla said:
Dialed inRoadDawg55 said:I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.
-
12-0 (I'm delusional)
It was factually correct at the time.AIRWOLF said:
For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
He did what great coaches are supposed to do in year 3.
-
I definitely didn't have Oregon at 4-8 ... I think I was thinking more in the 7-5 to 8-4 range ...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Great vote as alwaysTequilla said:
Dialed inRoadDawg55 said:I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.
My "dialed in" was more in reference to saying that Oregon would have the same record as UW and Oregon would beat UW once again. -
8-4
@BallSacked you got something right for once! Pumpy might have room for you on his higher discussion board!BallSacked said:Simple fact
-
It was never factually correct. But keep telling yourself whatever you need to.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It was factually correct at the time.AIRWOLF said:
For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
He did what great coaches are supposed to do in year 3. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)
9-9 > 8-10.AIRWOLF said:
It was never factually correct. But keep telling yourself whatever you need to.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It was factually correct at the time.AIRWOLF said:
For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Peterman is worse than Sark was.greenblood said:
One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.greenblood said:
I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are
They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.
This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
He did what great coaches are supposed to do in year 3. -
12-0 (I'm delusional)I'd just like to point out that I admitted I was totally delusional upfront, and was therefore correct.
-
8-4For the record I projected a downward trend, I just didn't think it would fall off a cliff.
