Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Predict whOregon's record

2

Comments

  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    8-4
    I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.
  • FenwickFenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    Already drinking beer so I am voting 11-1
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,943 Founders Club
    6-6
    I forgot I started this poll. I got off work early and have been drinking ever since I got home. Cool story Bill
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,286 Founders Club
    They should be Chinwhoreable!!!!!!!!!

    Their turn to go 0-12!!!!!
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,299 Founders Club
    edited August 2016

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,435
    8-4

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,299 Founders Club

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?
    You're a smart Duck.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,435
    edited August 2016
    8-4

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
    Screen shot
    8-10 is worse than 9-9.

    Quooks hate facts.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,972
    edited August 2016
    9-3 (status quo...we're just reloading for next year!!!!)



    I'll still trade you straight up a Helfrich for a Peterman. What do you say?

    No one wins when you choose between Billy Bobs.

    image



    I always thought Peterman looks like guy pearce, but this is well done.


    Edit: while searching for a picture to post I found out that he is banging Melisandre. That fucker.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885
    State Penn????
  • SpoonieLuvSpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,456

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
    I think he's doing an OK! job
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    12-0 (I'm delusional)

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are

    Disagree
Sign In or Register to comment.