Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Predict whOregon's record

1235

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,695 Founders Club

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,357 Founders Club

    Just would like to point out i was right.. I now feel validated

    Good job .. or good luck, either way, cheers!
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    4-8 or worse

    Just would like to point out i was right.. I now feel validated

    Good job .. or good luck, either way, cheers!
    The Roof Robbins crystal ball told me
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    12-0 (I'm delusional)
    dnc said:

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    image
    It's still accurate.
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    4-8 or worse
    Dialed in.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,232

    I think they will be 8-4 or 9-4 like UW. Of course, one of those wins will be against UW.

    Dialed in
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    Simple fact

    YBEE
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    Speaking of dooging I watched the Alamo Bowl and despite the outcome Oregon is still way more talented than we? are


    They have more talent than I think they're being given credit for, but they weren't exactly dominant against the Huskies last year. They were a VAJ, a Peterman, and a Babushka better. Way more talent is a stretch, and flat wrong when comparing defenses. Their defense last year sucked, ranked around 100th nationally. They got boat raced by Utah, lost to the Coogs at home and lost to TCU after running up a 31-0 lead. IMO, they were a VAJ away from being at best a 7-6 team last year.

    This year hinges on North Dakota and Brady's fighting Hokes. They're set at RB and WR, the offensive line should be good, and they still have plenty of team speed. If their defense improves and Prokup becomes VAJ 2.0, they'll be a force in the conference. Otherwise, 7-6, 8-5 seems more reasonable.
    I'll still trade you straight up a Carroll for a Riley. What do you say?
    Helfraud sucks, but he's done more in the Pac-12 than Peterman has.
    One year removed from Mariota, we lose more games in one season than we've had the previous 10 and give up the greatest comeback in bowl game history to a backup quarterback. Peterman has beaten Oklahoma in a bowl game, and also Chip. So, yes, I'll love to make that trade.

    Helfrich was given the keys to a brand new Ferrari, and he proceeded to drive it for a couple years without changing the oil.
    Peterman is worse than Sark was.
    For a guy who acts like he knows what he is talking about, you sure are fucking stupid.