Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Regarding Houston Meeting with Larry Scott

1246710

Comments

  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,481

    There were at least 5 different reasons for flagging that bullshit OP.

    So he doesn't know why he was flagged?

  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited July 2016

    ESPN is going to launch the ACC Network. So that's 3 out of 4. It's between the Big12 and the Pac.

    We? lose

    Come up with a realistic conference realignment that cuts out the PAC.

    Sorry to interrupt the self-hate session but it's not happening.
    Current XII plus AZ and CA schools.

    You're welcome.
    So the Cali schools are going to abandon Washington and Oregon to go play West Virginia? Ohok.gif.

    We already saw during the last realignment that the Big12 was in the weakest position by far due to having the smallest footprint by population, their location getting squeezed in between three other conferences, and the unequal sharing of power between Texas and the rest. Those issues have only worsened with the defections and the incursion of the SEC into Texas.


    There is no PAC school that makes sense as an expansion target for other schools culturally, geographically, or economically. Which is why there has never even been a rumor floated of such happening.

    Washington and Oregon (and their little brothers) aren't going to be left out in favor of WVU and Iowa State.
    People forget that ESPN runs college sports.

    Why do they need the Pacific Northwest?
    Nike and Seattle.

    Why do they need Iowa State, West Virginia, Baylor, Kansas State, or Texas Tech?
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    ESPN is going to launch the ACC Network. So that's 3 out of 4. It's between the Big12 and the Pac.

    We? lose

    Come up with a realistic conference realignment that cuts out the PAC.

    Sorry to interrupt the self-hate session but it's not happening.
    Current XII plus AZ and CA schools.

    You're welcome.
    So the Cali schools are going to abandon Washington and Oregon to go play West Virginia? Ohok.gif.

    We already saw during the last realignment that the Big12 was in the weakest position by far due to having the smallest footprint by population, their location getting squeezed in between three other conferences, and the unequal sharing of power between Texas and the rest. Those issues have only worsened with the defections and the incursion of the SEC into Texas.


    There is no PAC school that makes sense as an expansion target for other schools culturally, geographically, or economically. Which is why there has never even been a rumor floated of such happening.

    Washington and Oregon (and their little brothers) aren't going to be left out in favor of WVU and Iowa State.
    People forget that ESPN runs college sports.

    Why do they need the Pacific Northwest?
    Nike and Seattle.

    Why do they need Iowa State, West Virginia, Baylor, Kansas State, or Texas Tech?
    Nike is a fading brand and the NBA proved you don't need Seattle to grow your revenues.

    You do point out several schools that can die in a fire though. The eventual culling of two mediocre conferences into the Western power conference will be interesting.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    Did Larry the little bitch fly to Houston to try to head off the Big 10 or did they come to him after he demanded they come for an interview?
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,618 Swaye's Wigwam

    ESPN is going to launch the ACC Network. So that's 3 out of 4. It's between the Big12 and the Pac.

    We? lose

    Come up with a realistic conference realignment that cuts out the PAC.

    Sorry to interrupt the self-hate session but it's not happening.
    Current XII plus AZ and CA schools.

    You're welcome.
    So the Cali schools are going to abandon Washington and Oregon to go play West Virginia? Ohok.gif.

    We already saw during the last realignment that the Big12 was in the weakest position by far due to having the smallest footprint by population, their location getting squeezed in between three other conferences, and the unequal sharing of power between Texas and the rest. Those issues have only worsened with the defections and the incursion of the SEC into Texas.


    There is no PAC school that makes sense as an expansion target for other schools culturally, geographically, or economically. Which is why there has never even been a rumor floated of such happening.

    Washington and Oregon (and their little brothers) aren't going to be left out in favor of WVU and Iowa State.
    But USC and UCLA would abandon the Pacific NW schools if it allowed them into the Texas Market.

    That trumps both scenarios even if UW/Oregon is >>> WVU and Iowa State.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    godawgst said:

    ESPN is going to launch the ACC Network. So that's 3 out of 4. It's between the Big12 and the Pac.

    We? lose

    Come up with a realistic conference realignment that cuts out the PAC.

    Sorry to interrupt the self-hate session but it's not happening.
    Current XII plus AZ and CA schools.

    You're welcome.
    So the Cali schools are going to abandon Washington and Oregon to go play West Virginia? Ohok.gif.

    We already saw during the last realignment that the Big12 was in the weakest position by far due to having the smallest footprint by population, their location getting squeezed in between three other conferences, and the unequal sharing of power between Texas and the rest. Those issues have only worsened with the defections and the incursion of the SEC into Texas.


    There is no PAC school that makes sense as an expansion target for other schools culturally, geographically, or economically. Which is why there has never even been a rumor floated of such happening.

    Washington and Oregon (and their little brothers) aren't going to be left out in favor of WVU and Iowa State.
    But USC and UCLA would abandon the Pacific NW schools if it allowed them into the Texas Market.

    That trumps both scenarios even if UW/Oregon is >>> WVU and Iowa State.
    Precisely. They'll take the dollars and more national recognition over the Northwest in a second if the right deal emerges.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,744 Founders Club
    I'll only accept taking Texas and OU if we can finally get rid of WSU and Oregon State.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Swaye said:

    I'll only accept taking Texas and OU if we can finally get rid of WSU and UW

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,242 Founders Club
    People forget that the California schools already dumped 75% of the northwest schools once in the early 60s.

    I was there
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    godawgst said:

    ESPN is going to launch the ACC Network. So that's 3 out of 4. It's between the Big12 and the Pac.

    We? lose

    Come up with a realistic conference realignment that cuts out the PAC.

    Sorry to interrupt the self-hate session but it's not happening.
    Current XII plus AZ and CA schools.

    You're welcome.
    So the Cali schools are going to abandon Washington and Oregon to go play West Virginia? Ohok.gif.

    We already saw during the last realignment that the Big12 was in the weakest position by far due to having the smallest footprint by population, their location getting squeezed in between three other conferences, and the unequal sharing of power between Texas and the rest. Those issues have only worsened with the defections and the incursion of the SEC into Texas.


    There is no PAC school that makes sense as an expansion target for other schools culturally, geographically, or economically. Which is why there has never even been a rumor floated of such happening.

    Washington and Oregon (and their little brothers) aren't going to be left out in favor of WVU and Iowa State.
    But USC and UCLA would abandon the Pacific NW schools if it allowed them into the Texas Market.

    That trumps both scenarios even if UW/Oregon is >>> WVU and Iowa State.
    But in Race's mythical Pac-B12 super conference scenario it wouldn't be PAC NW vs. Texas it would be PAC NW vs. the dregs of the B12. UW and UO are never getting left out of a major conference in favor of Iowa State, WVU, KState, etc. It's just a basic understanding of leverage and bargaining. The PAC is stronger than the B12 and UW is stronger than at least 15 out of the 22 schools.

    Try to make your masochistic wet dreams more realistic.