Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hilliary cleared.
Comments
-
I'm sorry...the "Free Dictionary" is a whole entire class level above Wiki...and I'm sure both of them are much better overviews on the details of law then something like...say...the John Marshall Law Review Journal and a 24 page article about the term in question.2001400ex said:
First, show me where I linked to Wikipedia this thread. For fucks sakes.HoustonHusky said:From the link:
Some federal and state courts define it as (1) very great negligence, whereas others equate it to (2) recklessness.
...
As such, the federal district court equated gross negligence to “recklessness,”49
(references are in the paper, if you even know what an actual reference is...)
Here is your wiki link:
HondoFS...
Second. Go have a surgery where the idiot doctor lacerates your kidney or something stupid and try to sue them. Talk to an attorney about gross negligence and how far you get.
It's still clear you don't get what gross negligence is.
Fucking Moron.
At least we are getting somewhere...so it must have been a "medical accident" that caused your low IQ, and you are apparently bitter because you weren't able to sue for "Gross Negligence" and win?
Ever think it was just bad genetics?
-
Hillary's emails did less damage than a doctor who lacerated a kidney. She's still a murderer, but her emails don't have anything to do with it.sarktastic said:Hilliary is a kidney surgeon now?
It's awesome watching you monkeys flip out over this. -
-
Yes and she has violated it many times.2001400ex said:
You clearly know nothing about the law. It's not a wiki thing, it's a law thing. Dumbfuck.HoustonHusky said:
No, it doesn't. But it is amusing when really dumb people attempt to think they are intelligent by quoting wikis.2001400ex said:
Right or wrong. His news source isn't even aware that gross negligence requires intent.greenblood said:
If her private server was hacked, then that could be considered gross negligence. The only thing that saved Hillary was the fact that there wasn't any evidence of her system being hacked. Could have been hacked is different than proof of actual hacking. Now if email leaks come out, showing it was hacked by an outside entity, then yes she's toast, and charges would soon follow.2001400ex said:
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gross+negligenceSledog said:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook2001400ex said:
Right. Maybe you shouldn't get your news from memes.Sledog said:
All of them! Taken from secure government servers and put on the toilet server. See they are only allowed to be kept in certain places that way they can be kept secret.........2001400ex said:
Of the 113 classified emails they found. How many were stolen?Sledog said:
She was not authorized. Classified information is transmitted through secure channels not a server in a restroom. Some of Hillarys stuff was highly classified. I'm thinking crayons may be a bit advanced. Tomorrow you can eat the chewy pieces in the sand box.2001400ex said:
I thought it was a felony? Not to mention he did something that was not authorized. Hillary was authorized through the state department to have her own server.Sledog said:
Maybe this will help spell it out for you. Tomorrow we'll play with crayons!2001400ex said:
through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trustSledog said:
Yeah that's why Wikileaks just released a large number. FBI so far has 110 classified documents have you checked into anything other than Hufpo?2001400ex said:Sledawg:
Did you even read the law you posted? Or is it your clear lack of knowledge of the fact the that no one hacked confidential information. That was steamy dialog about her political positions tho.
Show me where that happened with information related to national defense.
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/07/29/navy-engineer-sentenced-for-mishandling-classified-material/30862027/
Have another tootsie roll, don't mind the sand.
It's clear your news source isn't aware of the basic definition of gross negligence.
How much f'ing Kool Aid do you drink?
You're a clueless maroon. -
It's absolutely clear you have no clue about the laws and rules surrounding classified information.2001400ex said:
First, show me where I linked to Wikipedia this thread. For fucks sakes.HoustonHusky said:From the link:
Some federal and state courts define it as (1) very great negligence, whereas others equate it to (2) recklessness.
...
As such, the federal district court equated gross negligence to “recklessness,”49
(references are in the paper, if you even know what an actual reference is...)
Here is your wiki link:
HondoFS...
Second. Go have a surgery where the idiot doctor lacerates your kidney or something stupid and try to sue them. Talk to an attorney about gross negligence and how far you get.
It's still clear you don't get what gross negligence is.
But then you are clueless. Born that way I'm sure. -
Tricky Dick was a mere nincompoop compared the the Cunt.
-
You sound bitter. And are pressing badly. Can only imagine the convulsions when Hillary actually gets elected.Sledog said:
Yes and she has violated it many times.2001400ex said:
You clearly know nothing about the law. It's not a wiki thing, it's a law thing. Dumbfuck.HoustonHusky said:
No, it doesn't. But it is amusing when really dumb people attempt to think they are intelligent by quoting wikis.2001400ex said:
Right or wrong. His news source isn't even aware that gross negligence requires intent.greenblood said:
If her private server was hacked, then that could be considered gross negligence. The only thing that saved Hillary was the fact that there wasn't any evidence of her system being hacked. Could have been hacked is different than proof of actual hacking. Now if email leaks come out, showing it was hacked by an outside entity, then yes she's toast, and charges would soon follow.2001400ex said:
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gross+negligenceSledog said:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook2001400ex said:
Right. Maybe you shouldn't get your news from memes.Sledog said:
All of them! Taken from secure government servers and put on the toilet server. See they are only allowed to be kept in certain places that way they can be kept secret.........2001400ex said:
Of the 113 classified emails they found. How many were stolen?Sledog said:
She was not authorized. Classified information is transmitted through secure channels not a server in a restroom. Some of Hillarys stuff was highly classified. I'm thinking crayons may be a bit advanced. Tomorrow you can eat the chewy pieces in the sand box.2001400ex said:
I thought it was a felony? Not to mention he did something that was not authorized. Hillary was authorized through the state department to have her own server.Sledog said:
Maybe this will help spell it out for you. Tomorrow we'll play with crayons!2001400ex said:
through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trustSledog said:
Yeah that's why Wikileaks just released a large number. FBI so far has 110 classified documents have you checked into anything other than Hufpo?2001400ex said:Sledawg:
Did you even read the law you posted? Or is it your clear lack of knowledge of the fact the that no one hacked confidential information. That was steamy dialog about her political positions tho.
Show me where that happened with information related to national defense.
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/07/29/navy-engineer-sentenced-for-mishandling-classified-material/30862027/
Have another tootsie roll, don't mind the sand.
It's clear your news source isn't aware of the basic definition of gross negligence.
How much f'ing Kool Aid do you drink?
You're a clueless maroon. -
Nixon launched us into fiat bliss resulting in the most luxurious retirement for parents and grandparents, in the history of the world, while leaving our kids and grandkids, the bill.Sledog said:Tricky Dick was a mere nincompoop compared the the Cunt.
-
This thread has AIDS. It needs to die. Mods?
-
You'll vote 6 times like you did for BHO?2001400ex said:
You sound bitter. And are pressing badly. Can only imagine the convulsions when Hillary actually gets elected.Sledog said:
Yes and she has violated it many times.2001400ex said:
You clearly know nothing about the law. It's not a wiki thing, it's a law thing. Dumbfuck.HoustonHusky said:
No, it doesn't. But it is amusing when really dumb people attempt to think they are intelligent by quoting wikis.2001400ex said:
Right or wrong. His news source isn't even aware that gross negligence requires intent.greenblood said:
If her private server was hacked, then that could be considered gross negligence. The only thing that saved Hillary was the fact that there wasn't any evidence of her system being hacked. Could have been hacked is different than proof of actual hacking. Now if email leaks come out, showing it was hacked by an outside entity, then yes she's toast, and charges would soon follow.2001400ex said:
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gross+negligenceSledog said:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook2001400ex said:
Right. Maybe you shouldn't get your news from memes.Sledog said:
All of them! Taken from secure government servers and put on the toilet server. See they are only allowed to be kept in certain places that way they can be kept secret.........2001400ex said:
Of the 113 classified emails they found. How many were stolen?Sledog said:
She was not authorized. Classified information is transmitted through secure channels not a server in a restroom. Some of Hillarys stuff was highly classified. I'm thinking crayons may be a bit advanced. Tomorrow you can eat the chewy pieces in the sand box.2001400ex said:
I thought it was a felony? Not to mention he did something that was not authorized. Hillary was authorized through the state department to have her own server.Sledog said:
Maybe this will help spell it out for you. Tomorrow we'll play with crayons!2001400ex said:
through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trustSledog said:
Yeah that's why Wikileaks just released a large number. FBI so far has 110 classified documents have you checked into anything other than Hufpo?2001400ex said:Sledawg:
Did you even read the law you posted? Or is it your clear lack of knowledge of the fact the that no one hacked confidential information. That was steamy dialog about her political positions tho.
Show me where that happened with information related to national defense.
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/07/29/navy-engineer-sentenced-for-mishandling-classified-material/30862027/
Have another tootsie roll, don't mind the sand.
It's clear your news source isn't aware of the basic definition of gross negligence.
How much f'ing Kool Aid do you drink?
You're a clueless maroon.
https://youtu.be/GuBEP6nfBl8
