This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
My middle school's girl's PE teacher way back when was a lesbian. Not the ntd,bb kind either.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
If they are transgender, why would they masturbate to young girls? Are they a lesbian trapped in a man's body?
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
If they are transgender, why would they masturbate to young girls? Are they a lesbian trapped in a man's body?
You axed "what would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way?" I said nothing about masturbation. hth
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
You are making a big deal out of nothing. Stop being a fucking pussy.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
The epidemic of gay men seeking visitor's passes at high schools so they can watch teen boys change would definitely lead one to believe that this transgendered bathroom policy will lead to even more sexual deviancy. Your ability to conjure up hypotheticals to be scared of is really quite remarkable.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
The epidemic of gay men seeking visitor's passes at high schools so they can watch teen boys change would definitely lead one to believe that this transgendered bathroom policy will lead to even more sexual deviancy. Your ability to conjure up hypotheticals to be scared of is really quite remarkable.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
You are making a big deal out of nothing. Stop being a fucking pussy.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
NO I think we should just continue to shred morality in the goal that maybe .0005 of the population can have another "look at me' moment to the disgust of about 60% of the population. We also need to give more attention to companies, washed up celebrities and state and local governments and Obama to be so courageous to stick up for those .0005.
That's what we need to continue to do.
I have a dream. A dream that one day the left will run out of groups to manufacture mistreatment to. Again it's a dream and will never be achieved.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.
There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.
All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
NO I think we should just continue to shred morality in the goal that maybe .0005 of the population can have another "look at me' moment to the disgust of about 60% of the population. We also need to give more attention to companies, washed up celebrities and state and local governments and Obama to be so courageous to stick up for those .0005.
That's what we need to continue to do.
I have a dream. A dream that one day the left will run out of groups to manufacture mistreatment to. Again it's a dream and will never be achieved.
I'll admit, I don't give two shits about whether transgendered folks can use whichever bathroom they want or not. It's a completely peripheral issue and it's getting an absurd amount of attention. The world will keep spinning regardless.
That said, the argument that this is going to be a springboard for sex offenders to have a Constitutionally protected child diddling field day is fucking retarded.
Comments
AND I WAS PROUD TO DO SO
I guess here's one way to stop it...
That's what we need to continue to do.
I have a dream. A dream that one day the left will run out of groups to manufacture mistreatment to. Again it's a dream and will never be achieved.
That said, the argument that this is going to be a springboard for sex offenders to have a Constitutionally protected child diddling field day is fucking retarded.