People care about Benghazi and the emails. When did Hondo hack Sven?
Maybe anyone that isn't a lemming realizes the 4 years and several investigations led by people who want to destroy Hillary, have turned up nothing. And the best part is, Republicans actually looked bad in the reports by denying funding for security there.
But why educate yourself race. Keep up your lemming ways.
Maybe you just dropped a load of bullshit and the 200 FBI agents giving immunity to Clinton underlings aren't done yet.
Maybe we already have clear proof she lied about the you tube video and called the families of the dead, liars.
Maybe the reason the exit polls of democratic voters in state after state that Bernie is winning state the main reasons that she is a lying cunt and they will vote for Trump before her
Maybe
She is a liar, that's for sure. But she wasn't culpable in Benghazi. Stick to real shit and not lies.
Ironic.
She is culpable for lying to the public, perp walking some loser in Cali for the you tube video, and calling the family of the dead, liars
She is responsible for the death of the Ambassador. It was her fucking job. She's the gal that you want to take the call at 2AM remember?
Ironic. You calling Hillary a liar while lying.
What is my lie?
I don't have time for a full recap. But we'll start with your comment that she was responsible for the deaths in Benghazi.
Read the Benghazi reports. Even the two Republican committees didn't come to that conclusion.
So the Secretary of State isn't responsible to protect the Ambassador she sent there. A novel way to suck her dick Little Hondo but we're not going to allow it. I didn't lie and you have told numerous whoppers here today.
Let's put to the side whether or not Hillary was culpable for Benghazi ...
Can't there be agreement in that how she handled the stuff was anywhere from poor to beyond poor? What is done is done on that ... but the part that leaves me with the bitter taste in my mouth is that the finger pointing has gone everywhere but her (from her standpoint). I've never once heard her say anything to the effect of lamenting on how she could have done better.
And, can't we all agree that whether she gets indicted or not for her servers and classified documents, that what she did there was clearly wrong and that people in her position with access to the most classified documents need to take great care in the security of those documents and in her case she clearly didn't? Cyber security for a person in her position should be a no brainer ... yet it wasn't.
At the end of the day to me, she's untrustworthy and her lack of accountability for her actions is beyond annoying and concerning to me. I don't care who she ran against, I would vote for the other candidate.
Bingo
Hillary has handled Benghazi like a software company upper manager throwing the middle managers and lower level staff under the bus because of a crappy product design.
Let's put to the side whether or not Hillary was culpable for Benghazi ...
Can't there be agreement in that how she handled the stuff was anywhere from poor to beyond poor? What is done is done on that ... but the part that leaves me with the bitter taste in my mouth is that the finger pointing has gone everywhere but her (from her standpoint). I've never once heard her say anything to the effect of lamenting on how she could have done better.
And, can't we all agree that whether she gets indicted or not for her servers and classified documents, that what she did there was clearly wrong and that people in her position with access to the most classified documents need to take great care in the security of those documents and in her case she clearly didn't? Cyber security for a person in her position should be a no brainer ... yet it wasn't.
At the end of the day to me, she's untrustworthy and her lack of accountability for her actions is beyond annoying and concerning to me. I don't care who she ran against, I would vote for the other candidate.
Bingo
Hillary has handled Benghazi like a software company upper manager throwing the middle managers and lower level staff under the bus because of a crappy product design.
Trump's not subtle enough to make this argument unfortunately ...
But if a politician handled this correctly and said let's forget about jail or no jail or whatnot ... but just laid out how she handled the situation in a way that rang true to the average American that her behavior is/was no different than the average middle management boss that sucks at their job ... the same middle manager that just about every American is very familiar with ... the issue is basically over with and Hillary's got about zero ability to maneuver out of her faults. The more that she raises her hand and gives that "oh no no no no no" face that she does while arguing against it, the more she twists herself into the ground.
To me, she can argue that Benghazi wasn't her fault and could have happened anywhere at anytime. She can argue that her files were secure on her server and that she took care of the fact. She can't argue that her communication with the fallen's families was beyond poor. She can't argue that she should have known better with the servers. She can't effectively argue those positions. And these aren't positions that are just random little things that aren't viewed as big deals. These are examples of where she had responsibilities that give insight into her views as Commander in Chief. She likes to talk about how Trump is too much of a "loose cannon" to be in that position. But she has also shown herself to be somewhere between incompetent and beyond reproach. She likes to talk about being a fighter for the people. But the reality is that she constantly views and puts herself in positions where she's above the people.
For those that don't see how Hillary can and very likely will lose in November ... the above is a very simple playbook of how that can happen.
Let's put to the side whether or not Hillary was culpable for Benghazi ...
Can't there be agreement in that how she handled the stuff was anywhere from poor to beyond poor? What is done is done on that ... but the part that leaves me with the bitter taste in my mouth is that the finger pointing has gone everywhere but her (from her standpoint). I've never once heard her say anything to the effect of lamenting on how she could have done better.
And, can't we all agree that whether she gets indicted or not for her servers and classified documents, that what she did there was clearly wrong and that people in her position with access to the most classified documents need to take great care in the security of those documents and in her case she clearly didn't? Cyber security for a person in her position should be a no brainer ... yet it wasn't.
At the end of the day to me, she's untrustworthy and her lack of accountability for her actions is beyond annoying and concerning to me. I don't care who she ran against, I would vote for the other candidate.
You need a different news source. A simple Google search turned up many quotes from her taking responsibility.
My source is what I hear from her in debates and interviews which self admittedly is not something I pay attention to 100% of the time.
You may need to learn the difference between "I've never heard" and "She never has" ... fucktard.
As for google searching ... I speak from the hip ... not writing a research paper (contrary to popular belief) ... that's the difference between getting paid (or not) for your opinion.
Let's put to the side whether or not Hillary was culpable for Benghazi ...
Can't there be agreement in that how she handled the stuff was anywhere from poor to beyond poor? What is done is done on that ... but the part that leaves me with the bitter taste in my mouth is that the finger pointing has gone everywhere but her (from her standpoint). I've never once heard her say anything to the effect of lamenting on how she could have done better.
And, can't we all agree that whether she gets indicted or not for her servers and classified documents, that what she did there was clearly wrong and that people in her position with access to the most classified documents need to take great care in the security of those documents and in her case she clearly didn't? Cyber security for a person in her position should be a no brainer ... yet it wasn't.
At the end of the day to me, she's untrustworthy and her lack of accountability for her actions is beyond annoying and concerning to me. I don't care who she ran against, I would vote for the other candidate.
You need a different news source. A simple Google search turned up many quotes from her taking responsibility.
And BTW, it took her over a month to publically come out and take responsibility. Lengthy in my book.
And one thing that I've heard a lot coming from her end on the campaign trail (and even called out in her interview/article) is to the effect that "we live in dangerous times and these things happen" ... I hate hearing that. While it's a true statement ... the question I have is what are you going to do about it. Too often what I hear is this idea that we're powerless to stop that. Bullshit.
And BTW, it took her over a month to publically come out and take responsibility. Lengthy in my book.
And one thing that I've heard a lot coming from her end on the campaign trail (and even called out in her interview/article) is to the effect that "we live in dangerous times and these things happen" ... I hate hearing that. While it's a true statement ... the question I have is what are you going to do about it. Too often what I hear is this idea that we're powerless to stop that. Bullshit.
Let's put to the side whether or not Hillary was culpable for Benghazi ...
Can't there be agreement in that how she handled the stuff was anywhere from poor to beyond poor? What is done is done on that ... but the part that leaves me with the bitter taste in my mouth is that the finger pointing has gone everywhere but her (from her standpoint). I've never once heard her say anything to the effect of lamenting on how she could have done better.
And, can't we all agree that whether she gets indicted or not for her servers and classified documents, that what she did there was clearly wrong and that people in her position with access to the most classified documents need to take great care in the security of those documents and in her case she clearly didn't? Cyber security for a person in her position should be a no brainer ... yet it wasn't.
At the end of the day to me, she's untrustworthy and her lack of accountability for her actions is beyond annoying and concerning to me. I don't care who she ran against, I would vote for the other candidate.
Deny, deny, obfuscate, point fingers, deny, sick political hounds on whoever is telling the truth, deny, finger point, look aghast.
And BTW, it took her over a month to publically come out and take responsibility. Lengthy in my book.
And one thing that I've heard a lot coming from her end on the campaign trail (and even called out in her interview/article) is to the effect that "we live in dangerous times and these things happen" ... I hate hearing that. While it's a true statement ... the question I have is what are you going to do about it. Too often what I hear is this idea that we're powerless to stop that. Bullshit.
You sound just like Trump. Nice work.
There's a lot that Trump says that I agree with ... there's things that he says that absolutely makes me cringe. He's far from an ideal candidate in my book. But if I was looking for an ideal candidate that fully represented my views, I'd vote for myself.
Comments
APAG's too upset about Benghazi to give a shit about Boobs' return
Hillary has handled Benghazi like a software company upper manager throwing the middle managers and lower level staff under the bus because of a crappy product design.
But if a politician handled this correctly and said let's forget about jail or no jail or whatnot ... but just laid out how she handled the situation in a way that rang true to the average American that her behavior is/was no different than the average middle management boss that sucks at their job ... the same middle manager that just about every American is very familiar with ... the issue is basically over with and Hillary's got about zero ability to maneuver out of her faults. The more that she raises her hand and gives that "oh no no no no no" face that she does while arguing against it, the more she twists herself into the ground.
To me, she can argue that Benghazi wasn't her fault and could have happened anywhere at anytime. She can argue that her files were secure on her server and that she took care of the fact. She can't argue that her communication with the fallen's families was beyond poor. She can't argue that she should have known better with the servers. She can't effectively argue those positions. And these aren't positions that are just random little things that aren't viewed as big deals. These are examples of where she had responsibilities that give insight into her views as Commander in Chief. She likes to talk about how Trump is too much of a "loose cannon" to be in that position. But she has also shown herself to be somewhere between incompetent and beyond reproach. She likes to talk about being a fighter for the people. But the reality is that she constantly views and puts herself in positions where she's above the people.
For those that don't see how Hillary can and very likely will lose in November ... the above is a very simple playbook of how that can happen.
Tequila is another lemming.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-takes-responsibility-for-benghazi-attack/
You may need to learn the difference between "I've never heard" and "She never has" ... fucktard.
As for google searching ... I speak from the hip ... not writing a research paper (contrary to popular belief) ... that's the difference between getting paid (or not) for your opinion.
And one thing that I've heard a lot coming from her end on the campaign trail (and even called out in her interview/article) is to the effect that "we live in dangerous times and these things happen" ... I hate hearing that. While it's a true statement ... the question I have is what are you going to do about it. Too often what I hear is this idea that we're powerless to stop that. Bullshit.
Clinton playbook.
Focus on stuff that actually moves the needle with American voters.
People vote with their wallets.