Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

ESPN Pumping Offseason Natty

2

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,911 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    We will find a way to 8-4.



    Now that we have the two-time NATIONAL coach of the fucking YEAR coaching the DAWGS, and in his third year, there is absolutely no reason to expect mediocrity.
    image

    coach of the year is a retarded award


    how? it's pretty fucking impressive
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    wobidbus said:

    With perhaps a weaker slate of offenses, can Death Row in 2016 be the best defense so far under Petersen? I know Stanford and Oregon are still strong at RB, but I'm actually looking forward to those games this year knowing that we for once have an even distribution of talent.

    Austin Pettis, Andrea Bocelli, Izayah Renfroo, Chincredible, Braydon Lenius, String, Quarter Pounds, Kendall Taylor, Nikk Little, Cheeko Macklatcher and Erin Fuller agree with your statement.
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    You're out of your mind if you think 8-4 is out of the question. 9-3 is my early prediction. Stanford, Oregon, USC, @WSU, @arizona, @Utah. There are four conceivable losses in those 6 games.

    Inconceivable!

    They could go 0-12. It's March, wgaf.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892

    We will find a way to 8-4.


    The difference is that we all expected this when we had a drunk frat boy as a coach.



    Now that we have the two-time NATIONAL coach of the fucking YEAR coaching the DAWGS, and in his third year, there is absolutely no reason to expect mediocrity. Yeah, the last two years were somewhat underwhelming, but the defense is amazing and the offense is now more experienced.

    If a fucking Sark coached team can win 9 games, there is no reason a team with coaching can do better.

    WIN 10 games or DIAF
    None of that contradicts my point.


    yes it does.

    there is no way this team goes 8-4. none.

    please.
    I have all the screensharts that I'll need.
  • section_332section_332 Member Posts: 2,403

    salemcoog said:

    We will find a way to 8-4.


    The difference is that we all expected this when we had a drunk frat boy as a coach.



    Now that we have the two-time NATIONAL coach of the fucking YEAR coaching the DAWGS, and in his third year, there is absolutely no reason to expect mediocrity. Yeah, the last two years were somewhat underwhelming, but the defense is amazing and the offense is now more experienced.

    If a fucking Sark coached team can win 9 games, there is no reason a team with coaching can do better.

    WIN 10 games or DIAF
    None of that contradicts my point.


    yes it does.

    there is no way this team goes 8-4. none.

    please.
    I have all the screensharts that I'll need.
    Screen shot this!

    image
    Wood toss
  • wobidbuswobidbus Member Posts: 308
    edited March 2016
    9-3 = 6-3 in conference, which would be an improvement I'd be OK with, but it'd be kind of disappointing considering the Pac looks pretty lousy this year. Is going at least 1-2 against USC, Stanford, and Oregon too much to ask?

    Edit: I'm choosing to ignore the fact that we haven't beaten ASU in 37 years.
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098

    salemcoog said:

    We will find a way to 8-4.


    The difference is that we all expected this when we had a drunk frat boy as a coach.



    Now that we have the two-time NATIONAL coach of the fucking YEAR coaching the DAWGS, and in his third year, there is absolutely no reason to expect mediocrity. Yeah, the last two years were somewhat underwhelming, but the defense is amazing and the offense is now more experienced.

    If a fucking Sark coached team can win 9 games, there is no reason a team with coaching can do better.

    WIN 10 games or DIAF
    None of that contradicts my point.


    yes it does.

    there is no way this team goes 8-4. none.

    please.
    I have all the screensharts that I'll need.
    Screen shot this!

    image
    Wat Da Fuq is wrong with the skin on her upper lip?
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,299
    edited March 2016


    Wat Da Fuq is wrong with the skin on her upper lip?

    I was going to ask which one? But, then I started shaking and was about to vomit.

  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    EwaDawg said:

    Wat Da Fuq is wrong with the skin on her upper lip?

    I was going to ask which one? But, then I started shaking and was about to vomit.



    You suck at quoting. Must be all the shaking and vomiting.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    wobidbus said:

    Scrolling through the ESPN Pac-12 blog, I'm noticing a lot of optimistic blurbs about UW's chances in 2016. No real groundbreaking insights, but I did find it interesting that 8 Pac-12 teams will be starting new QBs. With perhaps a weaker slate of offenses, can Death Row in 2016 be the best defense so far under Petersen? I know Stanford and Oregon are still strong at RB, but I'm actually looking forward to those games this year knowing that we for once have an even distribution of talent.

    No we dont. Pete cant recruit or coach. Heard it here 1st. Every Saturday for 26 odd weeks.
  • rodmansragerodmansrage Member Posts: 6,329

    We will find a way to 8-4.

    dennis, im gonna stab you in the eye for any/some/all the reasons below:

    1) "we'll go 8-4"
    2) the poasting holocaust that happened wednesday (thursday?)
    3) cause im just bout stabbing people

    #deathrow
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,499 Founders Club
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    wobidbus said:

    With perhaps a weaker slate of offenses, can Death Row in 2016 be the best defense so far under Petersen? I know Stanford and Oregon are still strong at RB, but I'm actually looking forward to those games this year knowing that we for once have an even distribution of talent.

    Austin Pettis, Andrea Bocelli, Izayah Renfroo, Chincredible, Braydon Lenius, String, Quarter Pounds, Kendall Taylor, Nikk Little, Cheeko Macklatcher Charlie McClutchins and Erin Fuller agree with your statement.
    fixed.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812

    dnc said:

    We will find a way to 8-4.



    Now that we have the two-time NATIONAL coach of the fucking YEAR coaching the DAWGS, and in his third year, there is absolutely no reason to expect mediocrity.
    image

    coach of the year is a retarded award


    how? it's pretty fucking impressive
    Because COTY almost never goes to the coach whose team won the championship, it always goes to the coach who "exceeded expectations" the most. This means consistently great coaches are passed over for frauds like Willingham who luck into a surprisingly good season here or there.
    For his efforts (in 2002) he (Willingham) was named the ESPN/Home Depot College Coach of the Year,[3] the Scripps College Coach of the Year, the Black Coaches Association Male Coach of the Year, and the George Munger Award College Coach of the Year by the Maxwell Football Club.[4]
    Subjective awards mostly all suck.
Sign In or Register to comment.