Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tina Fey Calls Out ‘Hollywood Bullshit'

1567810

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:
    The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.
    Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.
    Your news source must be scientists studying global warming for free.
    The deniers need only use the data the liars have. Simple stuff.


    Now you get yours news from cartoons. Nice work.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,636 Standard Supporter
    I thought the picture might help in your case.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    I thought the picture might help in your case.

    What, the picture that's about as truthful as a cartoon?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,636 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I thought the picture might help in your case.

    What, the picture that's about as truthful as a cartoon?
    Except it's the NOAA saying it.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I thought the picture might help in your case.

    What, the picture that's about as truthful as a cartoon?
    Except it's the NOAA saying it.
    Got a link? Given your cartoon says 1996 and 2016. I'm curious how the NOAA knows what the mean temperature is 2 months into the year.

    It's clear you really are the dumb.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,636 Standard Supporter
    Here ya go. Cooking the numbers and getting caught. Same old story.

    http://www.newsmax.com/LarryBell/CATO-DQA-MIT-NOAA/2016/02/01/id/712153/

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Here ya go. Cooking the numbers and getting caught. Same old story.

    http://www.newsmax.com/LarryBell/CATO-DQA-MIT-NOAA/2016/02/01/id/712153/

    You don't answer my question about 1996 and 2016.

    Then you link to a dude who wrote 2 books about climate change hoax. Do you think he donated the profits from the books to charity?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,636 Standard Supporter
    You link nothing then complain that anything anyone else links is BS so whats the point? You'd link stuff by the guys paid to show the problem exists. When other scientists who aren't being paid peer review the data and say call them out you ignore it. That's how the science community works, peer review. Maybe you need to tell them they're doing it all wrong.


  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    You link nothing then complain that anything anyone else links is BS so whats the point? You'd link stuff by the guys paid to show the problem exists. When other scientists who aren't being paid peer review the data and say call them out you ignore it. That's how the science community works, peer review. Maybe you need to tell them they're doing it all wrong.


    Sounds like you agree with All Gore's profit motive.

    You want a link with facts and evidence.... Here you go.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

    Do you want to listen to journalists and book writers? Or people paid to study the topic for a living?
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    You link nothing then complain that anything anyone else links is BS so whats the point? You'd link stuff by the guys paid to show the problem exists. When other scientists who aren't being paid peer review the data and say call them out you ignore it. That's how the science community works, peer review. Maybe you need to tell them they're doing it all wrong.


    Sounds like you agree with All Gore's profit motive.

    You want a link with facts and evidence.... Here you go.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

    Do you want to listen to journalists and book writers? Or people paid to study the topic for a living?
    I agree with you on this Honda about climate change. I think that there is a human element that is speeding up the natural occurrence of it. However, I think you've also acknowledged that America has come a long way in reducing their impact, and in many ways is leading the world in this effect. But if other countries like China and India don't come on board, we're really not helping the overall problem. This needs to be a global effort, and when a few countries get involved, it creates economic imbalance, and enables those advantaged countries (who are creating most of the problem), to continue their over production of green house gases.

    I think further restrictions within our own border will cause a greater proportion of economic difficulties than the desired effect on climate change, when others don't participate. If these other countries voluntarily or by force (sanctions) come on board, then I'd be for further steps to help the issue.