Brown getting canned after 8-5, 9-4 seasons

[Deleted User]

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only passively aggressively puts down James to prop up Sark.

Again he doesn't support Sark.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

PurpleReign said:

CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.

13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.

Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.

But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.

9.44 rounds up to 10 when you schedule a FCS game every year.

[Deleted User]

I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.

IrishDawg22

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??

[Deleted User]

IrishDawg22 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.

IrishDawg22

He_Needs_More_Time said:

IrishDawg22 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.

I actually like discussions with Boobs, He will actually engage you with stats, facts, etc. And his vagina doesn't get sand in it like others, who then resort to their final comeback, Doog!!!

dnc

IrishDawg22 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

IrishDawg22 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.

I actually like discussions with Boobs, He will actually engage you with stats, facts, etc. And his vagina doesn't get sand in it like others, who then resort to their final comeback, Doog!!!

+1

[Deleted User]

IrishDawg22 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

IrishDawg22 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.

I actually like discussions with Boobs, He will actually engage you with stats, facts, etc. And his vagina doesn't get sand in it like others, who then resort to their final comeback, Doog!!!

I was told I'm either Boobs or Harv though.

RaceBannon

I've always enjoyed boobs. Not so much the Irish

dnc

RaceBannon said:

I've always enjoyed boobs. Not so much the Irish

I'm for Irish boobs

AZDuck

I'm all for boobs. Kind of meh on Harv.

Global

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

PurpleReign said:

CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.

13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.

Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.

But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.

9.44 rounds up to 10 when you schedule a FCS game every year.

Kinda sorta. In the DJ years we always had the ABC scheduling, so there was always a game against a team that was a easy win, but I won't argue that an FCS team win is easier than the C game win in earlier years. But I don't think it actually changes the math of the win percentage. The UW should never lose to a C team whether it is Pacific (in the old days) or Eastern Washington.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

PurpleReign said:

CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.

13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.

Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.

But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.

9.44 rounds up to 10 when you schedule a FCS game every year.

Kinda sorta. In the DJ years we always had the ABC scheduling, so there was always a game against a team that was a easy win, but I won't argue that an FCS team win is easier than the C game win in earlier years. But I don't think it actually changes the math of the win percentage. The UW should never lose to a C team whether it is Pacific (in the old days) or Eastern Washington.

Pacific was a D. Big Sky teams are an F.

Global

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

PurpleReign said:

CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.

13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.

Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.

But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.

9.44 rounds up to 10 when you schedule a FCS game every year.

Kinda sorta. In the DJ years we always had the ABC scheduling, so there was always a game against a team that was a easy win, but I won't argue that an FCS team win is easier than the C game win in earlier years. But I don't think it actually changes the math of the win percentage. The UW should never lose to a C team whether it is Pacific (in the old days) or Eastern Washington.

Pacific was a D. Big Sky teams are an F.

I fully agree. My point is simply that both are guaranteed wins. So while I deplore scheduling F teams (but I still went to the game today), scheduling either one is the same result. So the same 9.44 win average is expected. I don't think we round up from 9.44 to 10 because our C games now are easier than our earlier guaranteed wins.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Global said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

PurpleReign said:

CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.

13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.

Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.

But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.

9.44 rounds up to 10 when you schedule a FCS game every year.

Kinda sorta. In the DJ years we always had the ABC scheduling, so there was always a game against a team that was a easy win, but I won't argue that an FCS team win is easier than the C game win in earlier years. But I don't think it actually changes the math of the win percentage. The UW should never lose to a C team whether it is Pacific (in the old days) or Eastern Washington.

Pacific was a D. Big Sky teams are an F.

I fully agree. My point is simply that both are guaranteed wins. So while I deplore scheduling F teams (but I still went to the game today), scheduling either one is the same result. So the same 9.44 win average is expected. I don't think we round up from 9.44 to 10 because our C games now are easier than our earlier guaranteed wins.

D's were guaranteed wins with a good coach. F's are guaranteed wins even with an average coach.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

AZDuck said:

I'm all for boobs. Kind of meh on Harv.

open wide..

jmc84

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

AZDuck said:

I'm all for boobs. Kind of meh on Harv.

open wide..

Be careful, she might try to steal your soul through your dong.

unfrozencaveman

She gets cuter as the night progresses - I remember her time in Seattle. 7-11, back in the day, serving up a classy Cheesy British w/ a smile and an affordable hj.