Brown getting canned after 8-5, 9-4 seasons
You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .
Comments
-
You still here?
-
wow, just wow.
-
So you think Lindquist wins the jerb, or did you miss Cyley twerking in the 4th quarter against Boise?puppylove_sugarsteel said:And a runner up to MNC in '10, and the crystal in '05 (Dumbshits think Saban is coming ) Oh Sark how could we even talk of firing you. 9-4 is a massive disappointment anywhere but Seattle. Better go 10-2 at the worst this year though, I got you nailed down to win the North (then you can return to 7-6 with a sophomore QB that hasn't taken a snap.)
You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .
-
If Sark goes 7-6 in 2014 with that schedule and everyone but Price, Parker, and Shamburger back, he is quite possibly, the worst coach in college football. PuppySteel could coach that team to 9 wins.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And a runner up to MNC in '10, and the crystal in '05 (Dumbshits think Saban is coming ) Oh Sark how could we even talk of firing you. 9-4 is a massive disappointment anywhere but Seattle. Better go 10-2 at the worst this year though, I got you nailed down to win the North (then you can return to 7-6 with a sophomore QB that hasn't taken a snap.)
You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .
-
CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
-
RoadDawg55 said:
If Sark goes 7-6 in 2014 with that schedule and everyone but Price, Parker, and Shamburger back, he is quite possibly, the worst coach in college football. PuppySteel could QBpuppylove_sugarsteel said:And a runner up to MNC in '10, and the crystal in '05 (Dumbshits think Saban is coming ) Oh Sark how could we even talk of firing you. 9-4 is a massive disappointment anywhere but Seattle. Better go 10-2 at the worst this year though, I got you nailed down to win the North (then you can return to 7-6 with a sophomore QB that hasn't taken a snap.)
You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .coachthat team to 9 wins. -
8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.PurpleReign said:CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
-
I can't quit you.
-
THIS! I hate when Doogs bring up "You'd fire James then cause he didn't win more than 7 regular season games until year 5" blah blah blah.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.PurpleReign said:CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Big difference between going 7-4 against a schedule with no cream puffs like Idaho State than going 7-6 with an Idaho State/Portland State. -
True, there were no cream puffs on the schedule. But Oregon State, Oregon, Cal, and Stanford in those days were usually pretty bad and damn near cupcake level. Even the Arizona schools always sucked except a few good years in the 90's.
-
The Arizona schools have never been cup cake bad though.
-
People don't understand how hard it is to win games in the PAC 12 now that the Arizona schools are serious about football.TitusPullo said:True, there were no cream puffs on the schedule. But Oregon State, Oregon, Cal, and Stanford in those days were usually pretty bad and damn near cupcake level. Even the Arizona schools always sucked except a few good years in the 90's.
-
I just love playing devil's advocate.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.PurpleReign said:CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Are we sure? That extra game is now in conference. Do I need to post that stat about the NW schools during that era?
Also, this goes for all coaches. One of the most significant changes has been the reduction of scholarships to 85. That is why you have seen the rise of the mid major + the top level of sub division be able to compete with BCS schools.
Spin machine on in 3, 2, 1.... -
Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?
W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU
T = Arizona
Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision. -
-
The extra conference game is against Colorado or Utah. This just in: they fucking suck. Thanks for proving my point.IrishDawg22 said:
I just love playing devil's advocate.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.PurpleReign said:CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Are we sure? That extra game is now in conference. Do I need to post that stat about the NW schools during that era?
Also, this goes for all coaches. One of the most significant changes has been the reduction of scholarships to 85. That is why you have seen the rise of the mid major + the top level of sub division be able to compete with BCS schools.
Spin machine on in 3, 2, 1....
I'm glad the 85 scholarship limit has brought the field back to Alabama and USC though. That's always a strong take. -
That compares quite well to Sark's magical 2010 season of 6-6 (bowl game excluded for comparison purposes):IrishDawg22 said:Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?
W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU
T = Arizona
Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision.
Syracuse, USC (only 8-5 in 2010), OSU, Cal, UCLA, WSU. Note the last four teams were all fucking dreck in 2010.
I appreciate all the research you are doing to prove my point for me.
-
Hold the phone, you can say Utah & Colorado suck, but if someone mentions the Pac 10 was a joke outside of UW, USC and UCLA for most years they are a Doog. Classic.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The extra conference game is against Colorado or Utah. This just in: they fucking suck. Thanks for proving my point.IrishDawg22 said:
I just love playing devil's advocate.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.PurpleReign said:CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Are we sure? That extra game is now in conference. Do I need to post that stat about the NW schools during that era?
Also, this goes for all coaches. One of the most significant changes has been the reduction of scholarships to 85. That is why you have seen the rise of the mid major + the top level of sub division be able to compete with BCS schools.
Spin machine on in 3, 2, 1....
I'm glad the 85 scholarship limit has brought the field back to Alabama and USC though. That's always a strong take.
And if you can't see the 85 scholly rule change the landscape of college football, I can't help you. -
Irish dogs gotta doog. #hesnotdefendingsark #really
-
Pacific & Tulane compare to beating Pac 12 teams or Syracuse?? WTF??TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That compares quite well to Sark's magical 2010 season of 6-6 (bowl game excluded for comparison purposes):IrishDawg22 said:Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?
W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU
T = Arizona
Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision.
Syracuse, USC (only 8-5 in 2010), OSU, Cal, UCLA, WSU. Note the last four teams were all fucking dreck in 2010.
I appreciate all the research you are doing to prove my point for me.
Just a reminder, the majority of the Pac 10 was "fucking dreck" until the Oregon schools discovered football in the mid to late 90's.
And to the other dip shit who chimed in, this is a discussion about the college football landscape, not individual coaches.
Now SSBIAFF. -
Doogs will always doog. It's inbred
-
Esuck's Poly Sci board must be slow today.
-
And they doog some more
-
What are your thoughts on Hassan Rouhani?
-
Is he a doog too?
-
13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.PurpleReign said:CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.
But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.
-
Irishdawg has reached IMALOSER territory in this thread.IrishDawg22 said:Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?
W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU
T = Arizona
Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision. -
It really is sad how he hasn't improved at all as a poster.RaceBannon said:And they doog some more
-
What's the only difference between and Irish wedding and funeral?
One less drunk.
Hopefully IrishDoog will be the one less drunk soon. DIAFF. -
Way to stick to the topic.
It is a sad when Steele makes more sense than a couple of you sand in vagina bitches.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
