This is a huge development and I imagine the dems will try to get someone through quickly. The GOP crying "that's not fair" on this is kind of sad. This is why you want to win the presidency and you have to play by the rules. If Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies at the end of a GOP presidential term,Mitch McConnell won't be crying to wait until after the elections.
I heard the other day that Ted Cruz would possibly be a justice nominee under a republican president. That would be interesting.
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
Bull. They shut down the gov and then won by a landslide in 2014. The dems will take the white house this year but I doubt a supreme Court obstruction will have any meaningful impact in that
This is a huge development and I imagine the dems will try to get someone through quickly. The GOP crying "that's not fair" on this is kind of sad. This is why you want to win the presidency and you have to play by the rules. If Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies at the end of a GOP presidential term,Mitch McConnell won't be crying to wait until after the elections.
I heard the other day that Ted Cruz would possibly be a justice nominee under a republican president. That would be interesting.
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
GOP plays hardball, blocks the nomination, ergo enduring 11 months of awful press, thereby losing the senate and the presidency.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
And the GOP leadership has already come out saying that Obama should not pick the next justice. Having a vacated seat for 11 months would be absolutely unprecedented and has no rational basis to it.
There is precedence, but you shouldn't let facts get in the way of the Constitution's clearly defined checks and balances mandate.
If you'd like to better understand the precedence you can reference Lyndon B. Johnson's 1968 appointment, which subsequently was filibustered.
My bad, I should amend my original comment to say: "Having a vacancy for 11 months while another president takes office would be unprecedented." The long vacancy of the Nixon administration occurred entirely within his first term. As did the long vacancy under John Tyler.
Anyone is free to chime in and explain what possible rationale there could be for Obama not being able to appoint the next justice. We're not even close to him announcing a nomination and the GOP is preemptively throwing a tantrum. There's not even a thin veil of reasoning here, this is pure political obstructionism that is quite symbolic of the nosedive that the Republican establishment has taken these last seven years.
It may be a very calculated attempt to force Obama to choose somebody who is at least somewhat moderate. It would probably be wise of him to do that anyway, because if the Senate Republicans attempt to block a very well qualified and politically moderate nominee, that would give the Democrats some valuable political ammo.
And the GOP leadership has already come out saying that Obama should not pick the next justice. Having a vacated seat for 11 months would be absolutely unprecedented and has no rational basis to it.
There is precedence, but you shouldn't let facts get in the way of the Constitution's clearly defined checks and balances mandate.
If you'd like to better understand the precedence you can reference Lyndon B. Johnson's 1968 appointment, which subsequently was filibustered.
My bad, I should amend my original comment to say: "Having a vacancy for 11 months while another president takes office would be unprecedented." The long vacancy of the Nixon administration occurred entirely within his first term. As did the long vacancy under John Tyler.
Anyone is free to chime in and explain what possible rationale there could be for Obama not being able to appoint the next justice. We're not even close to him announcing a nomination and the GOP is preemptively throwing a tantrum. There's not even a thin veil of reasoning here, this is pure political obstructionism that is quite symbolic of the nosedive that the Republican establishment has taken these last seven years.
It may be a very calculated attempt to force Obama to choose somebody who is at least somewhat moderate. It would probably be wise of him to do that anyway, because if the Senate Republicans attempt to block a very well qualified and politically moderate nominee, that would give the Democrats some valuable political ammo.
I think this is what happens. Obama ultimately nominates a moderate/ compromise justice and it goes through. I also expect Cruz to announce this week that he will block the nomination until the next presidential election. It'll turn into a circus.
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
GOP plays hardball, blocks the nomination, ergo enduring 11 months of awful press, thereby losing the senate and the presidency.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
GOP plays hardball, blocks the nomination, ergo enduring 11 months of awful press, thereby losing the senate and the presidency.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
In case you missed it, the GOP has had bad press for the last 25 years.
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
GOP plays hardball, blocks the nomination, ergo enduring 11 months of awful press, thereby losing the senate and the presidency.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
GOP plays hardball, blocks the nomination, ergo enduring 11 months of awful press, thereby losing the senate and the presidency.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
GOP plays hardball, blocks the nomination, ergo enduring 11 months of awful press, thereby losing the senate and the presidency.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
It'll bring out the conservatives by the bus load
Independents win elections.
HTH
2004 says hi
About 15% of GWB's 2004 vote is pushing daisies in 2016.
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
GOP plays hardball, blocks the nomination, ergo enduring 11 months of awful press, thereby losing the senate and the presidency.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
Let Obama put his gay male, Arab, or transgender in place.
Then when the new President is elected we can change direction ... Or not
Big turnout usually helps the Dems - minorities, women, helots, ducks. If the Senate holds up Obummer's nominee they hand the Dems an issue for the Senate races - in a year the Dems look to be picking up seats (not an editorial comment - just a favorable map). Give the wimmens and the blicks a reason to show up and it could go very poorly.
Maybe the most chincredible outcome would be for the GOP to stall, Hillary to get elected, and put Obummer on the bench.
Comments
I heard the other day that Ted Cruz would possibly be a justice nominee under a republican president. That would be interesting.
If the GOP really goes through with keeping Obama from being able to select a justice, they deserve @owen538
HTH
I wouldn't say that conservatives coming out in bus loads won the election. But I was surprised how even the moderates were.
Let Obama put his gay male, Arab, or transgender in place.
Then when the new President is elected we can change direction ... Or not
Big turnout usually helps the Dems - minorities, women, helots, ducks. If the Senate holds up Obummer's nominee they hand the Dems an issue for the Senate races - in a year the Dems look to be picking up seats (not an editorial comment - just a favorable map). Give the wimmens and the blicks a reason to show up and it could go very poorly.
Maybe the most chincredible outcome would be for the GOP to stall, Hillary to get elected, and put Obummer on the bench.