And the GOP leadership has already come out saying that Obama should not pick the next justice. Having a vacated seat for 11 months would be absolutely unprecedented and has no rational basis to it.
And the GOP leadership has already come out saying that Obama should not pick the next justice. Having a vacated seat for 11 months would be absolutely unprecedented and has no rational basis to it.
And the GOP leadership has already come out saying that Obama should not pick the next justice. Having a vacated seat for 11 months would be absolutely unprecedented and has no rational basis to it.
There is precedence, but you shouldn't let facts get in the way of the Constitution's clearly defined checks and balances mandate.
If you'd like to better understand the precedence you can reference Lyndon B. Johnson's 1968 appointment, which subsequently was filibustered.
And the GOP leadership has already come out saying that Obama should not pick the next justice. Having a vacated seat for 11 months would be absolutely unprecedented and has no rational basis to it.
There is precedence, but you shouldn't let facts get in the way of the Constitution's clearly defined checks and balances mandate.
If you'd like to better understand the precedence you can reference Lyndon B. Johnson's 1968 appointment, which subsequently was filibustered.
My bad, I should amend my original comment to say: "Having a vacancy for 11 months while another president takes office would be unprecedented." The long vacancy of the Nixon administration occurred entirely within his first term. As did the long vacancy under John Tyler.
Anyone is free to chime in and explain what possible rationale there could be for Obama not being able to appoint the next justice. We're not even close to him announcing a nomination and the GOP is preemptively throwing a tantrum. There's not even a thin veil of reasoning here, this is pure political obstructionism that is quite symbolic of the nosedive that the Republican establishment has taken these last seven years.
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
Hard to predict. The GOP obstructing the nomination all the way into the election could absolutely sink the Republicans chances for President. It's a lose-lose for the GOP.
Comments
But with Obama appointing one now, the dems will get the Supreme Court majority.
Time to undo some of the damage done by 5-4.
If you'd like to better understand the precedence you can reference Lyndon B. Johnson's 1968 appointment, which subsequently was filibustered.
Simple partisanship. Neither should pretend else wise.
Anyone is free to chime in and explain what possible rationale there could be for Obama not being able to appoint the next justice. We're not even close to him announcing a nomination and the GOP is preemptively throwing a tantrum. There's not even a thin veil of reasoning here, this is pure political obstructionism that is quite symbolic of the nosedive that the Republican establishment has taken these last seven years.
#Softball