I like to say a guy who turns 200 million into 4 billion is too stupid to make money as easily as this article states.
He could have twice that, rather easily.
Maybe you should write him and let him know.
Because you read it on the Internet, it has to be true.
The Internet is never wrong, and life moves in a linear motion.
Or maybe ...
His plan is to retire after losing the Presidency and then put all of his money in an index fund and live happily ever after. Ever think of that tuff guy.
I like to say a guy who turns 200 million into 4 billion is too stupid to make money as easily as this article states.
He could have twice that, rather easily.
Maybe you should write him and let him know.
Because you read it on the Internet, it has to be true.
The Internet is never wrong, and life moves in a linear motion.
Or maybe ...
His plan is to retire after losing the Presidency and then put all of his money in an index fund and live happily ever after. Ever think of that tuff guy.
I like to say a guy who turns 200 million into 4 billion is too stupid to make money as easily as this article states.
He could have twice that, rather easily.
Maybe you should write him and let him know.
Because you read it on the Internet, it has to be true.
The Internet is never wrong, and life moves in a linear motion.
Or maybe ...
His plan is to retire after losing the Presidency and then put all of his money in an index fund and live happily ever after. Ever think of that tuff guy.
I don't deal in hypotheticals.
You're right.
So you should quit arguing Trump would be worth twice his value had he done a hypothetical.
I like to say a guy who turns 200 million into 4 billion is too stupid to make money as easily as this article states.
He could have twice that, rather easily.
Maybe you should write him and let him know.
Because you read it on the Internet, it has to be true.
The Internet is never wrong, and life moves in a linear motion.
Or maybe ...
His plan is to retire after losing the Presidency and then put all of his money in an index fund and live happily ever after. Ever think of that tuff guy.
I don't deal in hypotheticals.
You're right.
So you should quit arguing Trump would be worth twice his value had he done a hypothetical.
I like to say a guy who turns 200 million into 4 billion is too stupid to make money as easily as this article states.
He could have twice that, rather easily.
Maybe you should write him and let him know.
Because you read it on the Internet, it has to be true.
The Internet is never wrong, and life moves in a linear motion.
Or maybe ...
His plan is to retire after losing the Presidency and then put all of his money in an index fund and live happily ever after. Ever think of that tuff guy.
I don't deal in hypotheticals.
You're right.
So you should quit arguing Trump would be worth twice his value had he done a hypothetical.
That isn't a hypothetical.
It's a mathematical fact.
Sounds like you need to learn the difference.
It never was done, there for you are creating a hypothetical.
1) Rubio outperformed and turned some Trump supporters that my guess questioned his electability in a general election ... perhaps Rubio's reasonably strong night absent Trump at last week's debate provided an opening that Trump now has to deal with.
2) Cruz with a real strange night to me in that he did better in the more populous areas than expected but Trump beat him out of votes in the more rural/church region.
3) Reports of GOP turnout of over 180k shattering the high end of estimates of 150k that was being predicted. If that trend continues in future states and can carry over until November, that's a great sign for the GOP nominee.
4) The Democratic side has all been about whether Bernie is electable/viable or not ... apparently the people of Iowa says he is.
5) I can't help but wonder how much of Bernie's surge is a desire to find any candidate that isn't Hillary ... nobody talks about whether she's electable or not ... but I have serious questions that she is.
Comments
I'm still hoping Bloomberg enters the ring after a few others give up. He's my "let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good" candidate.
1) Rubio outperformed and turned some Trump supporters that my guess questioned his electability in a general election ... perhaps Rubio's reasonably strong night absent Trump at last week's debate provided an opening that Trump now has to deal with.
2) Cruz with a real strange night to me in that he did better in the more populous areas than expected but Trump beat him out of votes in the more rural/church region.
3) Reports of GOP turnout of over 180k shattering the high end of estimates of 150k that was being predicted. If that trend continues in future states and can carry over until November, that's a great sign for the GOP nominee.
4) The Democratic side has all been about whether Bernie is electable/viable or not ... apparently the people of Iowa says he is.
5) I can't help but wonder how much of Bernie's surge is a desire to find any candidate that isn't Hillary ... nobody talks about whether she's electable or not ... but I have serious questions that she is.