Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Niners just hired Chippy
Comments
-
I've been a Race minion since back when you were paying Kim for "insider info", and I've never denied it.TurdBuffer said:
Hey, it's Teddy the suck-up, right on cue! Sucking up to Race, yet again. Perfect! Can you piss alone, Teddy? Or does Race or J have to hold it for you?ThomasFremont said:
I've been saying this ever since this fucktard showed up.RaceBannon said:
Your a moranTurdBuffer said:
Chip fanboy logic says 10-3>10-3. "HUGE"RaceBannon said:The longer the Helfrich era goes the more people will give Chip credit for what he did. He was a HUGE upgrade over Bellotti who had Oregon humming along but nobody seriously though he was winning a national championship.
Just because all Oregon coaches beat us like a drum doesn't mean they are all the same.
#Intern
#OGHHB
You piss sitting down like the bitch you are. -
Well, if we want to get technical here, Pete wasn't a smash hit in the pros his first two runs at it. Some of you dumb fucks are too young to know that Pete wasn't born at USC. He actually coached at NE and NY (Jets), and was average, though he won the piss poor AFC East one year.TurdBuffer said:
So, your comment is even less relevant. Whatever you say, J.PurpleJ said:
I never disputed the part about Pete beating Chip in the pros. My post was disputing the part about college. Learn to read.TurdBuffer said:
Meanwhile:PurpleJ said:
You sound worried. Chip beat Pete the only time they faced in college.PostGameOrangeSlices said:PurpleJ said:PM to 12s:
Carroll was better than Kelly in college and is better than him in the pros.
Fuck the 12s, but the Hawks will be fine
"Dec. 7, 2014 -- PHILADELPHIA -- A dominant defensive performance against Chip Kelly's high-powered offense even had Earl Thomas showing off his dance moves.
Russell Wilson threw two touchdown passes, ran for another score and the Seattle Seahawks stifled Philadelphia in a 24-14 victory over the Eagles on Sunday."
But, of course, Kelly had nothing to do with that loss.
As to his time at USC, whatever. He was pulling in some of the best talent assembled down there in a long time. I'm the first to admit that's part of the gig and it's part of how you assess a college coach.
But then again, recruiting to SC has been something that even krisvashon can do, so Chip beating SC AT SC with Pete when Pete had it going on, and doing it with Oregon players, isn't exactly irrelevant.
Would I take Chip over Pete? No, and here is why: Pete LOVES people. Chip HATES people.
That's kind of a problem when you're in the people business.
The word in Philly has been pretty consistent. Chip knows what he's doing, but he clashed with too many players, and sent them off one by one. Eventually, you need players who aren't your best friends if you're going to win, particularly in the NFL.
Is Pete a better technical coach than Kelly? I think not.
Is he a better motivator and, at the college level, a better recruiter? I'm sure he is.
But just because the USC juggernauts were better than the Oregon juggernauts doesn't mean much in my book.
-
Sark beat Pete once too...creepycoug said:
Well, if we want to get technical here, Pete sucked donkey balls in the pros his first run at it. Some of you dumb fucks are too young to know that Pete wasn't born at USC. He actually coached at NE and NY (Jets), and was average at best.TurdBuffer said:
So, your comment is even less relevant. Whatever you say, J.PurpleJ said:
I never disputed the part about Pete beating Chip in the pros. My post was disputing the part about college. Learn to read.TurdBuffer said:
Meanwhile:PurpleJ said:
You sound worried. Chip beat Pete the only time they faced in college.PostGameOrangeSlices said:PurpleJ said:PM to 12s:
Carroll was better than Kelly in college and is better than him in the pros.
Fuck the 12s, but the Hawks will be fine
"Dec. 7, 2014 -- PHILADELPHIA -- A dominant defensive performance against Chip Kelly's high-powered offense even had Earl Thomas showing off his dance moves.
Russell Wilson threw two touchdown passes, ran for another score and the Seattle Seahawks stifled Philadelphia in a 24-14 victory over the Eagles on Sunday."
But, of course, Kelly had nothing to do with that loss.
As to his time at USC, whatever. He was pulling in some of the best talent assembled down there in a long time. I'm the first to admit that's part of the gig and it's part of how you assess a college coach.
But then again, recruiting to SC has been something that even krisvashon can do, so Chip beating SC AT SC with Pete when Pete had it going on, and doing it with Oregon players, isn't exactly irrelevant.
Would I take Chip over Pete? No, and here is why: Pete LOVES people. Chip HATES people.
That's kind of a problem when you're in the people business.
The word in Philly has been pretty consistent. Chip knows what he's doing, but he clashed with too many players, and sent them off one by one. Eventually, you need players who aren't your best friends if you're going to win, particularly in the NFL.
Is Pete a better technical coach than Kelly? I think not.
Is he a better motivator and, at the college level, a better recruiter? I'm sure he is.
But just because the USC juggernauts were better than the Oregon juggernauts doesn't mean much in my book. -
All true, @creepycoug, and that's why CK fanboys should hang onto their money and not bet it on CK right now. He's 27-21 in a weak division, moving to the strongest division in the NFL. All excuses aside, that's a tall fucking order for any coach.
-
And still, with all the help that's been offered to you, you still don't get it.TurdBuffer said:
Chip fanboy logic says 10-3>10-3. "HUGE"RaceBannon said:The longer the Helfrich era goes the more people will give Chip credit for what he did. He was a HUGE upgrade over Bellotti who had Oregon humming along but nobody seriously though he was winning a national championship.
Just because all Oregon coaches beat us like a drum doesn't mean they are all the same.
-
Yikes. Super freak pressing there junior.TurdBuffer said:
Hey, it's Teddy the suck-up, right on cue! Sucking up to Race, yet again. Perfect! Can you piss alone, Teddy? Or does Race or J have to hold it for you?ThomasFremont said:
I've been saying this ever since this fucktard showed up.RaceBannon said:
Your a moranTurdBuffer said:
Chip fanboy logic says 10-3>10-3. "HUGE"RaceBannon said:The longer the Helfrich era goes the more people will give Chip credit for what he did. He was a HUGE upgrade over Bellotti who had Oregon humming along but nobody seriously though he was winning a national championship.
Just because all Oregon coaches beat us like a drum doesn't mean they are all the same.
-
One note, I revised my characterization of Pete's first run in the NFL. Donkey balls was too strong. He did win the AFC East once, although it was a shitty division then, but he was mostly an also-ran kind of guy ... nothing like the success he's having now.ThomasFremont said:
Sark beat Pete once too...creepycoug said:
Well, if we want to get technical here, Pete sucked donkey balls in the pros his first run at it. Some of you dumb fucks are too young to know that Pete wasn't born at USC. He actually coached at NE and NY (Jets), and was average at best.TurdBuffer said:
So, your comment is even less relevant. Whatever you say, J.PurpleJ said:
I never disputed the part about Pete beating Chip in the pros. My post was disputing the part about college. Learn to read.TurdBuffer said:
Meanwhile:PurpleJ said:
You sound worried. Chip beat Pete the only time they faced in college.PostGameOrangeSlices said:PurpleJ said:PM to 12s:
Carroll was better than Kelly in college and is better than him in the pros.
Fuck the 12s, but the Hawks will be fine
"Dec. 7, 2014 -- PHILADELPHIA -- A dominant defensive performance against Chip Kelly's high-powered offense even had Earl Thomas showing off his dance moves.
Russell Wilson threw two touchdown passes, ran for another score and the Seattle Seahawks stifled Philadelphia in a 24-14 victory over the Eagles on Sunday."
But, of course, Kelly had nothing to do with that loss.
As to his time at USC, whatever. He was pulling in some of the best talent assembled down there in a long time. I'm the first to admit that's part of the gig and it's part of how you assess a college coach.
But then again, recruiting to SC has been something that even krisvashon can do, so Chip beating SC AT SC with Pete when Pete had it going on, and doing it with Oregon players, isn't exactly irrelevant.
Would I take Chip over Pete? No, and here is why: Pete LOVES people. Chip HATES people.
That's kind of a problem when you're in the people business.
The word in Philly has been pretty consistent. Chip knows what he's doing, but he clashed with too many players, and sent them off one by one. Eventually, you need players who aren't your best friends if you're going to win, particularly in the NFL.
Is Pete a better technical coach than Kelly? I think not.
Is he a better motivator and, at the college level, a better recruiter? I'm sure he is.
But just because the USC juggernauts were better than the Oregon juggernauts doesn't mean much in my book. -
I have no idea how he'll do. None of us do. The guy can coach, that's for sure. His issues are with personnel, and in the NFL there are varying arrangements in terms of who makes those calls. I suspect Chip won't be in charge of personnel going forward, which with a guy like that is probably the best move. Make him coach and not manage the roster.TurdBuffer said:All true, @creepycoug, and that's why CK fanboys should hang onto their money and not bet it on CK right now. He's 27-21 in a weak division, moving to the strongest division in the NFL. All excuses aside, that's a tall fucking order for any coach.
The other thing is, he might have learned from the first gig. You never know. Kelly is a smart dude ... I'm sure he's also a stubborn dude. It all depends on which one of those wins out in his head.
But one thing you are DEAD WRONG about, and that is that Oregon is just as well off with the current staff as they were with Kelly. No fucking way. -
I am by no means a Chip Kelly leg humper (Hi Koop), but it is funny to see doogs try to prop up Peterman (who hasn't done a damn thing in a major conference) at the expense of a guy who owned said major conference while he was here.
-
All on the basis of Kelly's first game as a HC on the road. Peterman and those BSU teams could NEVER have done in the Pac 12 what Kelly did on his run with Oregon.PurpleJ said:I am by no means a Chip Kelly leg humper (Hi Koop), but it is funny to see doogs try to prop up Peterman (who hasn't done a damn thing in a major conference) at the expense of a guy who owned said major conference while he was here.
Remember, too, that Kelly was winning at Oregon when Harbaugh was coaching at Furd with Luck under center and Pete was at SC.
